Cathay Cineplex

Went to the Cathay Cineplex to watch Poseidon and took some photos of the place with my Sony Ericsson W550i. I am definitely not happy with the way they have turned this once historical part of Singapore into just another shopping mall. If this is actually preservation, I must say it’s been a real pathetic attempt at rejuvenation. Incidentally, they are also rebuilding Newton Circus Hawker Centre and I shudder to think of what it will turn out to be.

A lot of shops are yet opened when we walked around, but the cineplex is definitely a lot better than Eng Wah’s at SunTec. The seats were spacious and well laid out.

Enjoy the photos. If they are blur or badly taken, the fault is mine solely and not that of the equipment.


Front

Lift Lobby

Box Office 5F

Da Vinci Code Display on 5F

View from 6F

View from 6F

Picture House History display

5F looking down

Da Vinci Code? What Da Vinci Code? His name is Leonardo and this is what someone think of it

The Last Templar


The Last Templar

Yet another book along the lines of Dan Brown’s ‘Da Vinci Code’, about a cover-up of the true person of Jeshua – aka Jesus – of Nazareth. It goes along the line that the early Church founders have mystified the historical Jesus of Nazareth, and that the current Bible is but a political construct of the Roman Empire. In other words, the Biblical Jesus Christ is nothing more than a fairy tale.

This story is build around the premise that the Knights Templars found evidence that threatens the very spiritual foundation of the Roman Catholic Church – and the Christian faith – and used it to blackmail the Pope at that time. The only comfort was that this book wasn’t yet another ad naseum piece about the Holy Grail and the bloodline of Jesus.

I will not touch on much of the story of the book, because it would be a spoiler for anyone who wants to read it. Above which, I am a really lousy book reviewer and I can’t really remember exactly why I picked up the book from MPH, except for its title.

While the idea that the Knights Templar blackmailing the Vatican is interesting (or revolting, since everyone knows the Templars to be a military order formed to defend pilgrims going to the Holy Land), the author of this story also made use of the characters in his book to raise some interesting points. To the logical and analytical mind, one cannot refute these points right away. For e.g.

  1. No one knew exactly who wrote the Gospels and much of the New Testament, as we know it: Archaelogists and scholars generally agree that it is common for people in that era to use the names of others to write stuff, and thus the argument that the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John might not necessarily be written by the disciples of Jesus with those names (in the case of Matthew and John), or Mark and Luke.
  2. Some of the earliest books were written many years after the resurrection of Jesus Christ: The first Gospel, the Gospel of Mark appears about 40 years after, and the Book of Revelations almost 70 years after. In other words, if these were really written by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, the writers themselves would have been quite old. Considering the human lifespan at that time, the detractors do have a point. Also, if written records have come later, it would mean that it was just a record of an oral tradition prior to that. Knowing how things gets distorted when passed mouth to mouth, the truthfulness will thus be in doubt.
  3. The the present day Bible is a political construct. It did not come into being until the Council of Nicaea in 325AD. (My personal opinion is that the powers that be at that time, the Roman Emperor Constantine and the church leaders, all have their own agenda in doing so. The leaders a desire to crush any self-contradicting views, doctrines and beliefs among the believers, and the Roman Emperor the intention to mold the Christian religion as some form of social control of a fragile Empire that has only been recently unified after a long civil war, and also to pacify the now numerous Christian community in the Empire.)
  4. Many conflicting books which are difficult for reconciliation were discarded: The Gospels of Peter, Philip, Thomas, Judas, Mary Magdeline and the Egyptians, along with the secret book of John and the Gospel of Truth are such examples. All of these were ruthlessly destroyed because it challenges the Church’s stand that it is the only way to God. It is somewhat a miracle that copies of these gnostic books survived, hidden away for thousands of years until very recently.

The question is, if you are a believer, will you now start questioning your faith? Certainly almost no one could doubt that this social system proposed by Jesus – a system of compassion, care and welfare for those who needed it – is one of the best systems around in taming the savage and selfish beast within the human being. But what of your faith in the divinity of Jesus?

The author of the book raised another interesting point when he pointed out using one of his characters in the book to argue that if you are ready to believe the ‘alternate views’ of Jesus Christ, such as Jesus having left behind a bloodline, or that he is absolutely human but not divine, then you clearly never truly believe the Gospels in the first place. Above which, just as much as people believe in Jesus’ miracles without having seen him done them, how could anyone believe in any documents having a contrary view of him?

‘The Last Templar’ might have been just another ‘Da Vinci Code’ type fiction, had it not gotten me to start thinking about such things and getting myself to put them down in writing.

Historical fact: Founded in 1118AD, The Knights Templars – the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon – was a Military Order during the Crusades, and it also founded the concept of banking in Europe. The Templars inspired similar orders like Hospitaliers around the same time, and they were the staunchest defenders of the Christian faith in the Holy Land during the middle ages until the Latin kingdoms eventual defeat in 1297AD.

On 13 Oct 1307AD, Philp the Fair, King of France arrested all the Templars in France. They were accused of heresy, apostasy, devil worship and all manners of sins – e.g. sodomy, spitting and urinating on the Cross, and were subjected to a ruthless inquisition. It was no surprise many Templars were found guilty, with many confessions extorted under extreme torture probably along the same order of those during the Spanish Inquisition. The reason the French King has done so was because he owed the Templars a vast debt and he coveted the Templars’ wealth and alleged vast hidden treasures they found under the second Jewish temple in Jerusalem.

However, the ‘lost treasures’ were never found and they have inspired countless stories and even a movie, ‘National Treasure’. In the movie, it was suggested that the Free Masons are somewhat related to the Templars. Many similar conspiracy theories have since arise over the ages regarding the Free Masons and the Knights Templars.

Look! Someone is screaming unfair!! Woo-hoo…

A friend of mine once mentioned that the Stooge Times Forum page is one section he never reads and wondered why I get all worked up when I read the rubbish coming from it. I really don’t know why but perhaps, I am a sucker for ’emotional pain’?

Here’s another ‘fine’ example of such another piece of rubbish that got me worked up.

Selective upgrading unfair, S&C fees too high

IN ‘GIVING a lift to the upgrading debate’ (ST, May 4) writer Ong Soh Chin harbours the same misconception as most HDB residents when she mentioned that ‘Mr Low Thia Khiang of the Workers’ Party has pointed out that his Hougang residents have managed to enjoy free lift upgrading even with the limited funds of its town council’. A town council’s revenue comes from the service and conservancy charges levied on each HDB household, part of which is provided by the government as subsidy.

The lift upgrading in Hougang was funded by the money the town council saved, as routine expenditure is significantly less than the revenue it collects, even after providing for sinking-fund retention. The money in the town council, in whatever form, be it sinking fund or excess management fund, belongs to the HDB households within that town council.

What is unfair and inequitable, even within each town council, is that the surplus money which is used to fund the so-called free lift upgrading for a few blocks at a time is contributed by all the households under the town council.

Those whose HDB block is not selected for lift upgrading should ask the town council why another block was chosen instead of theirs. The justification that a town council cannot simultaneously carry out lift upgrading for every block is no consolation to those whose block is upgraded at a future date, as, by which time, they or the parents may have died or moved.

A more equitable method is for the households of each HDB block to pay for the lift upgrading themselves, with the town council allowing them to use their portion of the surplus money in the sinking or management fund from their prior S&C contributions.

The talk about surplus funds raises the question: Are the S&C charges too high?

It is time the government reviews the collection of S&C charges and their use for selective upgrading, to see how past unfairness and inequity could be remedied.

Bin Hee Heng

I quote: “What is unfair and inequitable, even within each town council, is that the surplus money which is used to fund the so-called free lift upgrading for a few blocks at a time is contributed by all the households under the town council.”

Very funny, because I don’t see Bin looking at it from a grander level, and see his alleged ‘unfairness’ occuring on a national level when the Tali-PAP takes money to fund upgrading for a few districts at all time – not to mention expecting residents to co-pay a small amount – with surplus money contributed by all Singaporeans – one way or another – to the nation.

And going by his logic, then how is it also fair, that Polytechnic students do not get their fare concession, when the transport companies (or was it LTA), consistently argue that the concessions are paid by all other full fare paying passengers? Are full fare paying passengers thus overpaying, because only certain students of a particular age group are given fare concession?

Before the gover-min should even ‘review the collection of S&C charges and their use for selective upgrading, to see how past unfairness and inequity could be remedied’, it should jolly well first review how it spends the state’s revenue to further the ruling party’s very own political agenda!

No wonder Taiwanese legislative councillor Lee Ao thinks that Singaporeans are stupid, and of a bad breed! Does anyone see a reason he would have considered otherwise when reading some of these exceeding dumb letters?!

记2006年5月6日大选

这一夜,我感动得哭了。

这一夜,后港与波东巴西居民以无上情操震动了狮城, 也让目下许多时事与政论分晰员跌破了眼镜。

威武不能屈?
富贵不能淫?
贫贱不能移?

这些我曾经追崇而又不确定存在的人, 这一夜出现了。 不是一个不是十个, 而是以万计的涌现了。

就在数天前, 有人以一亿八千万新元嚣张放肆,目无忌惮地公开污褥了这数以万计的选民。

同样数天前, 又有人以公开对手帐目来屈褥一名年过古稀但仍因为了国家, 选民和理念而咬紧牙关迈入可能是他终于倒下的战场的老战将。

就是这一夜,选民们狠狠地回敬了这些一心想用钱解决困难的‘精英’两个结结实实的漏风巴掌,把他们打得三荤五素,更把他们的掌舵人打得一夜白头。

也在这一夜,波东巴西民众更颁了枚成就勋章给詹先生,一枚不经总理口,不经总统手,而是以万张选票与八千万元铸成的勋章。

可憾的是, 总理说他是失望的!!

家有争子不败,国有争臣不亡。

有对金钱说不的选民,有不畏艰难的敌对从政者,对行动党而言,战果也许是苦了点。但以总理的立场,却应该给于嘉奖,因为这是国家之福,亦是领导的好运气。背负了人民八十多万张选票, 三份二支持,总理应更从容的展现出国大于党的大政治家风范。毕竟终要有一流选民与对手,才能真正成就一流的政俯。

– 一名 ‘世界级’ 选民 (‘World Class’ Voter) 的心中话


I do not dare to take credit for this piece and I thank the person who gave me the opportunity to post this piece on my blog. I did not write this, but I have read it several times, until I was moved to tears.

I dedicate this to:
first and foremost, the brave and loyal people of Potong Pasir and Hougang;
Mr Low Thia Kiang, MP of Hougang SMC; and
Last but not least, Mr Chiam See Tong, MP of Potong Pasir SMC

TGIF – The World Since Apr 14

This is a really short and much belated version of the TGIF for the last 2 weeks. I have been lazy to write and also to follow some of the news on the local papers. As you know, I do not have a very high esteem of the local media. So if you are disappointed I didn’t really comment much on the current events, especially the local elections, I am sorry.

The World This Week


– that Warmonger Bush’s public approval rating has fallen to 32%, a new low for his presidency, a CNN poll showed. The survey also showed that 60% of Americans disapprove of the way Bush is handling his job. (Warmonger can take comfort that Chen Shui-bian’s public approval rating is even lower.)

– that several Supreme Court justices grilled state and U.S. gover-min lawyers about whether lethal injections as currently administered for executions caused excruciating pain. (Then administer them sleeping pills before administering the lethal injection.)

– that Australia’s most wanted terror suspect, Saleh Jamal, has pledged loyalty to Osama bin Laden and threatened to ‘chop up’ John Howard as Lebanese authorities prepare to deport him as early as May 8. Jamal’s firebrand comments come before his imminent rearrest by Australian police, who will use one of six arrest warrants prepared during his two years in a Beirut prison for firearms trafficking and entering Lebanon on a false passport. (They should just deport him to the moon… without space suits.)

– that oil companies have told motorists to blame Americans, Nigerians and Iranians for record petrol prices in most parts of Australia. Pump prices raced to an all-time high of A$1.45 a litre, with more price rises possible in coming days. (Phew… for once, no one was blaming China.)

– that Mahmoud Abbas, the ‘Palestinian’ president, raised the possibility of dismissing the Hamas-led gover-min if he decides that its policies harm the ‘Palestinians’. “The constitution gives me clear and definite authority to remove a gover-min from power, but I don’t want to use this authority,” he said. “Everyone should know that by law this power is in my hands.” (Maybe it would be Hamas that removes him from power.)

– that American troops will probably be gone from Iraq by mid-2008 as the Iraqi forces they are training take over from them, Iraq’s National Security Adviser Mowaffak al-Rubaie said. He said he expected the roughly 133,000 U.S. troops to be cut to less than 100,000 by year’s end and an ‘overwhelming majority’ of them to have left by the end of 2007 under a U.S.-Iraqi plan for progressively handing over security. “We have a roadmap, a condition-based agreement where, by the end of this year, the number of coalition forces will probably be less than 100,000,” he told Reuters in an interview. (Very optimistic. The only certainty about Iraq right now is not whether the situation will get better or worse, but that there will still be an Iraq tomorrow.)

– that Iran has vowed to strike at U.S. interests worldwide if it is attacked by the U.S., which is keeping military options open in case diplomacy fails to curb Tehran’s nuclear program. Supreme Lea-duh Ayatollah Ali Khamenei made the threat before the UN nuclear watchdog reports on whether Iran is meeting Security Council demands to halt uranium enrichment. (It would take the resolve of the Allies in World War II to go in and clean out this nest of vipers.)

Singapore This Week


– that ‘several PAP veterans face first contest at the ballot box’. (What an oxymoron! What veteran are you talking about when this is their first real contest?)

– that referring to the likes of former National Development Mini$ter Tay Cheang Wan, and MP Phey Yew Kok, Chiam See Tong said: “These people are carefully selected by the PAP and yet they turn out to be crooks and lost public money. How can they criticise the Opposition when they cannot select good candidates?” (Chiam doesn’t know ‘criticising’ is a Tali-PAP priviledge meh? ‘Bway song’ – not happy – sue them lah!)

– that the opposition has come under attack for not having original ideas on how it plans to be an alternative voice in Singapore. MP Amy Khor, who has been returned unopposed in Hong Kah GRC on Nomination Day, questioned the substance of their plans at a Tali-PAP rally in Chua Chu Kang. Ms Khor said, “The opposition’s only battle cry so far is that there must be an alternative voice, and check and balance. But let me ask you, what good is an alternative voice if it is recycled ideas and mere talk? The opposition’s voice is a recycled battle cry at every election.” (Well, you so smart so good then you why you join Tali-PAP? Come and run an opposition and show them how to do it lah!)

– that Lao Lee has outlined what he feels are the key qualities of a first world opposition. He says the opposition candidates must have character, commitment, ability and a good track record – just like the candidates in the Tali-PAP. (Eh? So after so many years, now it isn’t just about paper-qualifications anymore? And my friend, a first class voter, Pig-Pig says, “Aiyah, WP cannot be First World Opposition lah. They all LOW-class Opposition. * Pun intended *)

– that SDP chairman Ling How Doong, who is contesting Bukit Panjang, was conspicuously absent when the party introduced its six candidates for Sembawang GRC at a press conference. Earlier, he had separately raised the possibility of getting Typo Chee Soon Juan removed from the party’s central executive committee. Accompanied by SDP assistant secretary-general Wong Hong Toy at the Fajar Secondary School Nomination Centre, Mr Ling told the media that he and Mr Wong are considering an ouster of typo Chee. (It maybe too little too late. The day you jokers ousted Chiam, the day you have sealed the fate of your party.)

– that at a midday rally, Baby Lee said, “Right now we have Low Thia Khiang, Chiam See Tong, Steve Chia. We can deal with them. Suppose you had 10, 15, 20 opposition members in Parliament. Instead of spending my time thinking what is the right policy for Singapore, I’m going to spend all my time thinking what’s the right way to fix them, to buy my supporters votes, how can I solve this week’s problem and forget about next year’s challenges?” (With the kind of pay you get, the voters ought to make your life interesting with more opposition, Baby! And if your father once handled 13, you can surely handle 26! And by the way, I am always ready to sell my vote. Tali-PAP give five million I will vote for them… by leaving Singapore so I can’t vote for the opposition.)

According to the Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law, ©1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc., the word fix also carries the following meaning:

To influence the outcome or actions of by improper or unlawful means: fix a prizefight; fix a jury.

Informal. To take revenge upon; get even with.

(The TalePAP ought to sue the Merriam-Webster for giving this wonderful word such libellious definitions.)

– that a day later, his Press Secretary had to issue a ‘clarification’: “At the lunchtime rally in UOB Plaza, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong addressed the issue of opposition MPs in Parliament. He said that if the opposition were to hold 10 to 20 seats in Parliament, he would have to spend much more time thinking what was the right way to ‘fix’ them. What PM meant by his remark was that if there were many more opposition MPs in Parliament, the government and opposition would spend all their time and energies countering each other, and Singapore would be worse off for it. He used direct language to get this important point across to a mass rally crowd. If the exact words he used offended, he is sorry. (Just accept that, ok? Say more you kenna libel suit not my business.)

– that the ‘liar’ word was used by both Lao Lee and Wong Wua Kan Seng. “I say Mr Gomez is a liar and he’s dishonest and if he thinks it’s libel, he can sue Mr Wong Kan Seng, he can sue me,” thundered Lee. (** Danger! Warning! ** “I have now called you a liar. And if you deny, I am a liar and you have defamed me. So I sue you.”)

– that Baby Lee said this, when he was referring to the large turnouts at some opposition rallies, especially those of the WP, over the past eight days. “The opposition flies a kite, see if it catches the wind. Doesn’t? Well, let it go, fly another one. Doesn’t? Fly another one. Finally, if it doesn’t fly or there is no wind, then they give up flying kites and play another game – marbles or something like that. So it’s exciting to listen to, because you never know what new kite would pop up.” (I’ll prefer to go fly a kite and ‘pah gorli’ – play marbles – then listen to nothing but self praises, ‘warnings’ about bad opposition candidates, criticisms against the opponents and all that nonsense about flat ‘upgrades’. But of course, the kites fly high in Potong Pasir and Hougang. It almost took flight in Aljunied and it won’t be a surprise Aljunied becomes a historical term along with Cheng San and Eunos in the next election.)

– that Lao Goh warned voters that there would be consequences if they voted for the opposition and knocked out key members of the Tali-PAP team. He pointed out that if a Tali-PAP GRC team lost at the polls, it would mean the loss of at least one minister and two or three other office-holders. He was speaking at a press conference in Potong Pasir, which he visited last night to show his support for PAP candidate Sitoh Yih Pin on the last day of campaigning. (You have got so many capable people. One lost, just promote another, right? It’s not like the Tali-PAP has actually got a talent dearth, when it continually PERSUADE ‘talented people’ to join them in politics! Get this right, ok, these people has to be PERSUADED to come into politics. Does that mean they never thought about it in the beginning? Contrast that with some of the opposition, Goh Meng Seng, for example, who has all along attempted to engage people in dialouge before joining the WP, and needed no persuasion.)

– that Lao Goh said he is confident that the Tali-PAP will win in Potong Pasir. (Oh well, even if Chiam lost, he didn’t lose to a ‘better’ candidate. He lost to money. And what does that tells us? If you can screw someone for money money, go ahead and do it. Fortunately, the voters in Hougang and Potong Pasir are made of sterner stuff.)

– that Tali-PAP’s Irene Ng maintained she had made a general point that mini$ter$ will listen to Tali-PAP MPs more when they criticise gover-min policies, over their opposition colleagues. (Tali-PAP MP criticisms are meaningless when they vote for policies they criticised all the same. They would have to make sure they don’t use words like ‘betrayal’ too.)

– that the Tali-PAP lea-duhs have called on the WP lea-duhs to withdraw Gomez as a candidate. Not succeeding in this, the Tali-PAP has begun to accuse the Low Thia Khiang, the WP’s chief, of keeping people of suspect integrity in his camp. (Let me translate that into maid lingo for you, “You not good boy! Play with bad boy no listen to what pappy says!”)

– that Yeo Cheow Tong Lam Cheow Kong attacked SDA candidate Steve Chia for demanding a guarantee that bus and train fares will not go up after the GE. Keeping transport cost down is difficult when other prices are going up, such as wages, materials and oil. (Really? How is it that they still have record profits?)

– that to demonstrate that fares remain affordable, Lam pointed out in 1987, a bus commuter travelling an average of 8km would spend about 90 cents for bus fare. For the same journey today, he would spend $1.05, which means bus fares had climbed only about 15 cents in about 20 years. This works out to a 17% rise against an almost 180% jump in workers’ salaries in the same period, Lam said. (Look, no one is saying it isn’t affordable. But that does not answer the question: WHY? when the transport companies are still having record profits! It’s so typical of Tali-PAP mini$ter$. They either have terrible comprehension skill, or they really don’t listen to you. Or perhaps, to be a million dollar mini$ter, you must have a penchant for misunderstanding the question and answering out of the point by regurgitating standard answers.)

– that on a walkabout in Woodlands, Mr Khaw met a disgruntled 70 year-old resident who had much to gripe about and a 20-minute exchange followed. The man, who goes to polyclinic doctors, could not see why the policy does not extend to bills below $30. Khaw explained that the gover-min is heavily subsidising fees in polyclinics, particularly for the elderly. “That’s why it’s $30. If there’s no subsidy, then most likely it’s $60, $80, $100. Not all Singaporeans go to polyclinics, about 20% do. For the 80% of people who do not go to polyclinics, who go to GPs, private hospitals, they will benefit from this new scheme that I’m proposing.” (Listen carefully, Khaw. The 70-year-old resident said, “Let me have the opportunity to make use more of my Medisave.” In other words the man didn’t care if it was $60, $80, or $100. He just want to be able to use his Medisave to pay it!)

– that when asked to give a breakdown of the cost of building a HDB flat, Mabok Tongue replied, “You want to build some for me?” (Well, you don’t answer a question with another question, Mabok. Just give us the breakdown!)

– that if the Tali-PAP is really serious about retaking Potong Pasir, they should send Mabok Tongue to retake Potong Pasir. (Who else better to explain this blasted upgrading policy to the people of Potong Pasir and convinced them that the Tali-PAP is really serious?)

Trivial, Jokes and Thoughts from Discussions


– that Lao Goh said Chiam See Tong is too old and should retire. (According to some friends, Chiam allegedly reply, “After you, Goh!”. – pun intended.)

– that Scott McNealy, the often acerbic co-founder of Sun Microsystems Inc. and one of Microsoft Corp.’s harshest critics, stepped down as CEO after 22 years as the pioneering maker of computer servers reported its latest quarterly loss. Sun’s shares surged more than 8% after the announcement of McNealy’s departure and the latest in a series of losses. In extended-session trading, Sun’s shares gained 41 cents, or 8.2%. (That really shows just how ‘popular’ this CEO is with investors.)

– that software prices could fall as companies develop subscription sales and distribute increasingly complex programs that run in Web browsers, Micro$oft CEO Steve Ballmer said. (Sounds like a blackmail. – i.e. no subscription sale, no cheaper software.)

– that shares of Micro$oft Corp. tumbled 11%, after the world’s largest software maker reported third-quarter profit that missed Wall Street expectations and lowered its earnings guidance. The tempered forecast which comes as Micro$oft boosts research and development spending left some analysts grappling with whether that decision will translate to higher profit. (Right. As if they are really concerned with how any company is doing when they wrote about Google’s is pure hot air?)

– that while America may still think of itself as the land of opportunity, the chances of living a rags-to-riches life are a lot lower than elsewhere in the world, according to a new study published. The likelihood that a child born into a poor family will make it into the top 5% is just 1%, according to ‘Understanding Mobility in America’, a study by economist Tom Hertz from American University. By contrast, a child born rich had a 22% chance of being rich as an adult, he said. (The rich gets richer and the poor gets poorer. Nothing will change this.)

– that bra producers have been forced to offer bigger cup-sizes in China because improved nutrition is busting all previous chest measurement records. Hong Kong-based lingerie firm Embry Group no longer produces A-cups for larger chest circumferences and has increased production of C, D and E-cup bras to meet pressing demand. The Beijing Institute of Clothing Technology said the average chest circumference of Chinese women has risen by nearly 1cm since the early 1990s. (Now that’s really ‘good news’ for the men.)

1 163 164 165 166 167 186