Photos – Marina Bay Sands

I still have a few more days of leave to go after coming back from Phuket and it’s no good cooping up at home. So I head down to town in the late afternoon of a rainy Tuesday to the Marina Bay, hoping to take some photos of the Marina Bay Sands and the Helix. If you ask why did I go to the Marina Bay Sands instead of Resort World Sentosa which has opened earlier, the answer is simple: Marina Bay Sands is easily accessible on foot or by public transport without any add-on cost.

My first impression of the place? WORK IN PROGRESS! There’s still a whole bunch of scaffolds, construction equipment (cranes) still in operation and many construction workers milling around putting the final touches to the place. Even the Helix itself is half completed.

The impression is similar for Resort World Sentosa when I looked across from Vivocity. Frankly, both of the Integrated Resorts [IR] are nothing more than construction sites in their final stages of touching up. Had it been just any other mall or commercial building, it would not have been allowed to open.

Thus, all the glitches and issues in them are of no surprise to me. While a human baby is expelled from the mother’s body before its head grows too big for its passage through the birth canal, the IR was forcefully opened so that the casinos can begin operation. Had there been more delays, there will be damage (financially and economically) to the entire project. Very much like a baby staying longer in the womb would have died stillborn.

Either way, there is really nothing spectacular about Marina Bay Sands until its own sky garden is opened. It’s just another high end mall like Ion Orchard with shops selling branded goods. The view of the skyline of the Central Business District [CBD] from it or the Helix is another matter entirely. If you want a good photo of the skyline of Singapore, this is one of the place to go to snap some pictures. Personally, I would return in the evening some time in the future to obtain some night shots of Singapore’s skyline.

So, here’s the pictures I took. They might not be impressive since I ain’t a photographer and I take them for my own pleasure. At least I am proud to say I didn’t rip them off from someone else’s site.


Recommended Read:
Sgboleh: Insurance and Investment

Revisited – Phuket, Thailand

This my second visit to Phuket. Before the trip, I have been repeatedly asked by many kind people why I am still going to Thailand in spite of the chaos. Even my parents are worried.

Either way, I confirmed with friend who went up the week before and he told me there was no trace of tension or unrest over in Phuket. On top of that, another friend was in Bangkok. If I am not wrong, he stayed just a few junctions away from where the red-shirt protesters were holed up and the fact that he could tweet about his situation there tells me that even in Bangkok, much of the Thai capital is safe. I was not very concerned with what goes on in Bangkok and to be frank, I was actually more concerned with an earlier quake down at Sumatra. After all, I had already taken leave, booked the tickets and hotel rooms. I am quite sure I would be perfectly pissed for the rest of the year if another tsunami wiped out the beaches in Phuket.

Why am I going Phuket again? It’s because I just wanted to get away from Singapore – where every road is always congested and everywhere is full of people. I just want to go to a place where I could get away from the crowd here to just laze around and relax, even if I am not doing much sightseeing or shopping.

Either way, this round I didn’t get out to Phi Phi Island again, even though I originally wanted to go. The reason was that I was running short of Thai currency and end up spending a lot of time near the vicinity of the resort (Phuket Island View) at Karon bordering Kata and two nights sipping beer and looking at ‘ladyboys performing’ over at Bangla Road in Patong.

If I compared it to the last resort (Woraburi) I stayed in, the room Phuket Island View is just passable. I didn’t quite like this because there wasn’t enough power points in my room to go around (I had to ‘steal’ from one of the bed lamps), the air-conditioning was weak on the first day until a technician came by to fix it, and the water pressure at the shower was pathetic. However for the price difference (almost 6000 baht if I remembered correctly) between Woraburi and Phuket Island View, it is difficult to complain. The consensus is that we’ll still go back to Phuket Island View as long as prices stayed at that range. After all, we don’t really spend that much time in the room.

So as usual, here are the photos from this trip.

~~~ * ~~~

Back to the situation in Bangkok, as I am writing this post the Thai army is clearing and in fact, has cleared the area where the ‘Red Shirts’ are holed up in. Around 1500 ~ 1530 hrs Singapore time, it was reported that the leaders have surrendered, and two of them have been arrested. The rest will surrender to the police soon after.

My personal opinion is that democracy cannot come to a land when there is no rule of law and a strong and vibrant middle class. The government gahmen must also have a vision for nation building – a ground plan on how the country should proceed for the next 10 ~ 15 years, whether it remains in power or not. A gahmen can claimed itself to be democratic, but it is not just about free elections and universal suffrage. When a country does not have these fundamentals, then its elected gahmen will be as fragile as Thailand’s.

Anyway, I sympathise with the ‘Red Shirts’ for several reasons. First of all, it wasn’t the ‘Red Shirts’ who started this entire mess. The so-called People Alliance for Democracy or ‘Yellow Shirts’ did much worse back in 2008. While the ‘Red Shirts’ have generally stationed in central Bangkok, the ‘Yellow Shirts’ created trouble not only in Bangkok but all over Thailand. Secondly, most of the ‘Red Shirts’ are generally just poor people from the poorer north and northeast regions of Thailand. The People’s Power Party (PPP) gahmen they supported after the last election in December 2007 was removed through a combination of street violence, political intrigue and what I called ‘judicial wizardry’. Not only were two Prime Ministers, Samak Sundaravej and Somchai Wongsawat ousted, the PPP was ultimately dissolved. It was the political equivalent of razinjg the stronghold to the ground after killing the leaders. Lastly, while the police had issued arrest warrants for Sondhi Limthongkul and 8 other ‘Yellow Shirt’ protest leaders on charges of insurrection, conspiracy, unlawful assembly and refusing orders to disperse, no action has been taken against them until today.

The military operation in central Bangkok may have ended the protest and the violence but it will not end the deep rooted resentment of the poor in Thailand against the more affluent or those considered to be the social elite. The people will pay close attention to the action taken against the ‘Red Shirt’ protest leaders now in custody and it is unlikely that the political situation in Thailand will normalize in the near future.

I will remember Bangkok May 19th, 2010 the way I remember Beijing June 4th, 1989.


Recommended Reads:
Cloudywind: Facebook has moved to the dark side for more power!
Sgboleh: Learn to control your credit cards

評論: 德士附加費

【新明日報 五月十日報導】 為了三元附加費,德士紛湧向 IR,商場德士短缺。

俺一向來都認為附加費這個爛制度一直都給了德士司機 “柿子選軟的捏” 的方便,而結果卻是搭客任其宰割。附加費一直的加而且種類越來越多,多到眼花繚亂但是問題解決了嗎?情況何時有改善過?現在德士司機更是變本加厲,讓人實在忍無可忍!是已經到了應該徹底廢除德士附加費 (機場和半夜過後附加費除外) 這個怪胎的時候了。

這世界上只有在新加坡德士這門買賣是告訴了他顧客在哪,他還理直氣壯的給你一籮筐的理由和藉口來拒絕。甚至政府規定了顧客要給付 “小費”,他還似乎有點老大不願意去做的呢。德士附加費儼然已經變成了德士司機的一種變相的 “福利制度”!在咱們這一直都要求國民勤勉和自力更生的偉大國家裡,德士司機竟然像某種特權階級似的得到如此的優待和保護!政策基本上一直都是反對任何形式的福利的新加坡,不但容忍德士附加費如此違反國家核心價值的弊端存在,似乎還是立法允許的!這到底是哪門的狗屁道理?最近好像有某電台的主播拿了他們和妓女來比較還令到他們暴跳如雷。但俺覺得妓女比他們可憐多了,至少俺可從來沒說聽過有什麼時間去芽蘢 “叫雞” 是要給什麼附加費的。

德士司機老申訴錢難賺,但是有多少人的錢是容易賺的?既然大多數人賺錢都不容易,那麼他們憑什麼要求咱們讓他們更方便的賺錢?難道他們不知道什麼時候哪裡有搭客?倘若開德士真的賺錢如此困難,為何咱們不時見到路旁的搭客無助和拼命的招手,但德士卻寧願空車的開在公路的中間車道卻又死都不肯開到路邊接載乘客?為何很多地方的德士站裡的人大排長龍而德士卻渺無影踪?為何乘客要到了忍無可忍的電召德士才好不容易的召來一輛?為何德士人均比例比香港還高的新加坡,一輛德士就那麼難等?為何,俺香港來的同事來了兩天就向俺申訴新加坡的德士服務是如何的糟糕?咱們的德士服務已經徹底的影響了… 不,應該說是毀壞了咱們國家身為一個國際都市的優良形象!

咱們廣東人有句話說:畫公仔唔使畫出腸。問題是在哪一看就明白。廢除附加費制度是勢在必行的!廢除了它就猶如 “摟草打兔子”,順便也把德士司機裡的那些害群之馬給逼出來。這樣那些濫用這可惡制度而且通常也是態度最惡劣的敗類從此就無所遁形再也不能不勞而獲了!

就讓德士的起車價上漲來徹底取代這雜亂無章的附加費制度吧!既然公路收費制都把德士和私人用車相提並論了,顧慮是不是有人會搭不起根本就是多餘的。搭德士的費用基本上就應該和擁車持平。況且,如果更多人用地鐵或者巴士那不是更環保嗎?

【注】俺是一個時常搭德士的人,以上的文章對俺是無利可圖的。建議德士起車價上漲來平衡被取消的附加費對所有的搭客未必是件有利的事。但是俺認為這一面倒而且單方面只照顧德士司機 (而間接是德士公司) 的利益的制度是必須馬上廢除的。要多快廢除?最好是朝令夕改!但請避免朝三暮四!

2 years after a traffic accident…

It’s been more than 2 years after this accident. Now that the verdict has been reached, I could freely talk about this.

First of all, I had wasted a fair bit of time on this, having to turn up at a lawyer’s office to sign an affidavit, and later to attend a court session. This is in spite of the photo evidence we have presented, and I was told the other driver insists that my friend was solely at fault, and he wants to claim against the insurance company covering my friend’s car insurance (NTUC Income in this case) 50% of his repair bill.

His bill was a hefty $10,000 and that means he was trying to claim $5,000. It was shocking to us because it cost my friend less than $2,000 of that to repair his own vehicle which spares are more difficult to obtain. That’s not mentioning, another friend who completely wrecked his Subaru WRX STi when travelling in Malaysia only had to pay $8,500 to restore it to tip top conditions if he so wishes. The front of the WRX was completely ruined, and a large branch fell from a tree to crush the top of the vehicle after the collision. Now compared that kind of damage to the Toyota Altris at fault! (See photos shown on my other blog post.)

The fact that it took long enough for such a minor matter to be resolved certainly reinforce my bad impression of NTUC Income, which reminded me of the acronym – No Trouble Until Claims. In fact, when we were having coffee after the court session, my friend informed me that the insurer didn’t give the photo evidence to the lawyer which represented us in this case until September last year. That is in spite of the fact that the photos were submitted the next day, and my friend was given the assurance that the case was very clear cut and not disputable. Contrary to what he was told, the entire case dragged on until a hearing became necessary. I do not know what discussions and agreements were made between the lawyers, but in the end it was agreed upon that it should be resolved at the Primary Dispute Resolution Centre (PDRC) in the Subordinate Courts.

Thus, we were ‘summoned’ before a judge a few days ago to whom both sides will present their case. It was to my disgust when I discovered that the other driver gave a completely different account – one that in my opinion defied the laws of physics and a load of blatant lies. It was quite interesting to see how the other lawyer tried to ‘grill’ us in defense of his client, even presenting an utterly ridiculous scenario. In this scenario, the accident was a result of ‘bad handling’ in which the fault solely lies with my friend. He suggested that our vehicle has hit the central divider first, and the deflection then caused us to hit his client’s vehicle. He also repeatedly rephrased his questions in his attempt to get my friend to admit that it was his fault.

Fortunately for us, it seems the judge found the photo evidence to be more credible, and she has asked the other driver on several occasions to explain the photo evidence and why it differs from his account. At one point when the other driver was talking out of point she told the interpreter to remind him to look at the photos and explain again how that tallies with his account of the event. To me that was quite a relief, as it was quite clear who the judge has found more credible. It was rather difficult for us to keep ourselves from wanting to interject, though we refrain from doing so as we do not wish to offend the judge.

After a gruesome 40 minutes or so, the judge asked for us to leave the room and the lawyers to stay behind. In the end she told the lawyers that the photo evidence was more credible in describing the event, and told the lawyers that the matter should be settled 80 – 20, in our favor. It was an acceptable outcome, even though we would prefer that the other driver gets nothing and be made to bear 100% of all his repair cost. After all, that fellow has not only failed to be responsible for his mistake, he has lied thorough his teeth to take advantage of the insurance claims.

Either way I hope this would be the final conclusion to the matter since I do not want to waste more time on this matter. However, as a result of this experience, I would like to point out several things.

Firstly, it is not good enough to have photos of the final resting position of the vehicles in the accident. It is also necessary to show clearly in the photos the lane markings, especially when the other driver is at fault. Thus, have a photo further away showing the road in front and behind the vehicle. Preferably, these photos should capture any u-turns, arrows indicating the direction of travel, traffic lights, speed camera, ERP gantry etc. All of these will help when there is a dispute on who has the right of way. It also gives an indication of the traffic condition at that point of time, i.e. clear or congested. Also, take photos of any brake marks on the road, since the speed of the vehicles is also taken into account. Beyond that, take photos of the damage of not only your vehicle, but also that of the other vehicle so you will not be caught by surprise when you are shown the damages and presented an entirely different account of the events.

Beyond that, allow no one from either vehicles to leave the scene. Friends or relatives or not, these people are witnesses. Take special note when ‘helpful people’ who are not involved showed up to give suggestions where to take both vehicles for repair. Ask whether these people are related to the other driver since these people are choosing to get involved. My personal opinion is that these might just be people from shady workshops nearby who are trying to pull a fast one.

It is most likely these people will not want their presence to be noted down down in the statement. In my opinion, if the other driver is adamant that nothing like this had happened that may work to his disadvantage since he appears to be covering up the details. If the passenger is assisting the driver to take photos, it would be best if the photos capture some of these people in negotiation with the driver.

Lastly, take note of who the other party has called, especially if you are asked to speak with someone on the phone and told to take the vehicles to their workshop for evaluation. Get hold of the number called if possible but if that information is not available, at the very least that should be mentioned in your statement. Both of us got some a little chewing out from the lawyer previously when he questioned us about our statements and found that we failed to put these details in.

Basically, the more details and visual evidence in support of your statement of the event, the less room there is for the other guy to worm himself out of his fault and waste the collective time of everyone – lawyers, the judge, the insurance company, and yourself. There is entirely no reason to waste so much time on a minor accident especially when the other person is at fault.

~~~ * ~~~

And talking about such accidents… it was to my dismay that on April 23 I was again involved as a witness in another one on Keppel Road around 10am in the morning. I was in a cab on the center lane of the 3-laned Keppel Road somewhere next to the KTM Station at Tanjong Pagar. The cab was straight and stationary in its lane, waiting for the traffic light to turn green when I heard a loud bang. I didn’t even realise the cab I was in was hit until the taxi driver turned his cab towards the KTM station. It was then I noticed that the left mirror twisted in an odd angle and the culprit: a white van (with hazard lights on) at the drop off area in the KTM station.

How that idiot van driver hit us with a glancing hit was beyond me. I was too shocked to react and it was over within a few minutes after the 2 drivers exchanged particulars. By the time I got off the cab and look at the damage at the destination at Anson Road, I realised that there was a big dent on the side of the cab and the left head light assembly and that side of the bumper was totally wrecked.

But here’s the good news, I will be taking the MRT for some time…


Recommended Reads:
SG Boleh: Is HDB flats really affordable?
ZDNet Blogs: [Humor] Microsoft changes the Windows license

Short Takes

I have written something about these comments before:

Lao Lee said voters must be “daft” if they found fault with the government’s gahmen’s housing policies, and cautioned Singaporeans not to cast a protest vote against the ruling party over this.

He also said if National Development Mini$ter Mah Bow Tan Mabok Tongue is unable to defend this policy, ‘he deserves to lose’ at the next general election, he quipped, to laughter from the participants, including a chuckling Mr Mah.

The Tali-PAP is a master in ‘dividing the people’. Previously it was about stayers and quitters, then heart-landers and cosmopolitans. Now the divide is between existing home owners and those aspiring to be home owners.

As a person who has already bought a HDB flat, and has about another 12 years to pay it off, I ain’t complaining too much about the price I paid for mine. After all, I can’t even get a new flat of the same size now even if I could afford the current prices. (Affordable housing is a misnomer when you need to work the entirety of the better part of your life – between 15 ~ 30 years – to pay it off.)

Lao Lee thinks we would be daft if we do not like housing prices to go up. The fact is, even though I may not like the idea of my own flat losing value, there is no use when I can’t realize the gains I have made on my property because I have to pay for even more for another one. That’s not mentioning the possibility of the future generation not being able to own their own homes. In other words, we would be truly daft if we do not want to see some changes to the current insane housing policy.

My personal opinion is this, if Lao Lee seriously want to see how well Mabok Tongue can defend the current housing policies, he can send Mabok to Hougang SMC and contest against Low Thia Khiang. On top of which, raise the ante and send Grace Fu to contest in Potong Pasir too, or have her contest where Kenneth Jeyaratnam will be contesting in the next election.

The result of these two contests will certainly be a good opinion poll on how the policy stands among Singaporeans. If the Tali-PAP is confident that its mini$ter$ can defend their policies well, it will stand the chance to recover the two opposition wards too.

Personally, I think the result would be a foregone conclusion… and I suggest one person reflect upon his remarks and perhaps on one April Fool’s day or a particular Parliament session put on a Daffy Duck costume.

~~~ * ~~~

From the TODAY Freesheet (April 10, 2010)

Despite having to compete against the People’s Action Party’s (PAP) Tali-PAP electoral machine, the Opposition has been unable to work closely with one another. This undermines the Opposition collectively.

Some time ago, someone taught me that the strength of something may also be its weakness. For e.g. Those which is hard will be brittle, and those that has high tensile strength will be soft.

So while the argument that unity is strength may sound reasonable, a unified front by all of Singapore’s opposition parties may be the equivalent of putting them all in the same boat. All it needs is one careless motherfxxker mofo, and the entire boat sinks with them.

Consider this, would it be reasonable for the Workers’ Party or the Singapore People’s Party to defend the position of another opposition party member if he makes a insensitive remarks to certain races or religious groups?

The editor of this article is either too idealistic, or simply politically naive.

~~~ * ~~~

Are hotel hourly rates necessary?
Letter from Soh Ah Yuen TODAY Freesheet (Apr 28, 2010)

I refer to “Will budget hotels review operations?” (April 22) concerning court proceedings against the owner of Shing Hotel at Kitchener Road for renting out hotel rooms by the hour to prostitutes.

Singapore is not Malaysia, which has long highways.

There, motorists sometimes break their journey to make use of hotels enroute, to perhaps have a shower and catch a few hours of sleep before driving on. This is done primarily with safety in mind.

Alarm bells should therefore ring for the relevant authorities when hotels here rent out their rooms by the hour. It does not require much detective work to uncover the illegal side of their operations.

The operators of such hotels should be made to account for why they would want to rent out their rooms in this way.

If this is enforced strictly, it will save the authorities precious time playing a cat-and-mouse game with the operators.

Soh Ah Yuen may believe it is a great idea to eradicate the problem by prohibiting hotels from renting their rooms by the hour, but let’s take a look at how effective the crackdowns have been.

In fact, the fight against smut has gone on for awhile. Let’s go further back and look at how it started with the sleazy pubs and bars and massage parlors at Joo Chiat. While Chan Soo Sen can proudly claim that he has been successful in eliminating the smut from Joo Chiat, it has merely moved on to one section of Geylang. When the problem of Joo Chiat SMC is now the problem of Aljunied GRC, is the problem really solved?

Next, the crackdown on street walkers has probably gone on for almost a year. There is no doubt that the Singapore Police Force has been efficient when one look at the number of arrests made in each operation. But the question is, in spite of the efficiency of the police, was the crackdown at all effective when we now have reports that street walkers spilling over into Jalan Besar (outside the Petain Road & Deskar Road area), People’s Park & China Town, Lavender and even as far as Kovan? These crackdowns are as good as excising a tumor only to find the cancer spreading to other parts of the body. In fact, this is like the Vietnam War where we have a large body count to show, but no significant progress is made in the war.

The crackdown has also driven the pimps to now take their business online to websites and forums. I am almost amazed by the resilience shown here, whoever running these prostitute rings seems to have adopted Mao Zedong’s concept of guerilla warfare and strike where they are least expected.

In view of how the ‘contagion’ evolved in response to law enforcement, does Soh Ah Yuen really think prohibiting hotel hourly rates will serve as an effective measure to put an end to this? Consider the scenario where people rent out rooms in private property, which means the problem now move into the heart of residential areas and not just near them. On top of which, what about people ‘doing a Jack Neo’ – buying cars and installing curtains in them so they can take a woman for a quick romp in car parks?

Are these scenarios more appealing to Soh Ah Yuen?

~~~ * ~~~

A biker buang his bike & die at ECP, made me jam for 45mins + $3 ERP! He’s probably going to hell because of that! – Aaron Ong Shaocheng

I used to rant a lot when I am caught in a jam. I will usually direct my vitriol on the other road users for not keeping to their lanes or failing to maintain a constant speed and slowing down for no reasons at the ERP gantries or speed camera.

However, I’ll keep my mouth shut when someone has lost his life in a traffic accident. There is no need to guess the deceased is a motorcyclist most of the time. The reason being that I have many friends who are motorcyclists, and no one deserved such a death.

Personally, I really wondered, whether the cost of education spent on this Aaron Ong Shaocheng (allegedly an A*Star scholar as well) is wasted. Then again, the idea of education that Confucius have more than 2000 years ago is very different from what we are doing now. Back then, the idea was to ‘educate’ people in manners and rituals, so that everyone will behave in a defined and harmonious way within the society. These days, education just cramp into our heads the hard skills of science – chemistry, mathematics, physics and what not. Abilities in these hard skills become the standard one’s intelligence and education while the soft skills of ‘learning how to be a proper human being and not a beast’ take a backseat.

Morality is a big word that no one dares to talk about and you get beaten with the stick labelled ‘self righteousness’ for simply talking about it. Even school teachers refrain from disciplining students because of parents’ complaints. But when children are not showed why they are disciplined but instead those who attempt to discipline are punished, what is there to expect from these children when they grow up? They have barely understand what is not socially acceptable, because their parents gave them the impression they have done no wrong.

Aaron Ong definitely won’t be the first nor the last of self-centered, compassion lacking beasts. But I’ll do one thing for sure when I find out what’s his car license number. That is, if I ever see his car in one of those minor accident, I will wind down the window and shout at him: “Serves you right! Thank God you and your stinking piece of iron scrap will be off road tomorrow. I am quite sure traffic will be smoother and it’ll save me some money on ERP because of that, you c**bai kia!”

1 34 35 36 37 38 186