Random Thoughts

During dinner and the coffee session with a friend 2 nights (and also during the lunch with an ex-colleague yesterday), we touched on the topic of melamine, fake eggs, and even human trafficking.

On Melamine

A lot of us denounced China when some arse even dared mentioned that melamine has always been added to milk and it began in the United States.

Whoever brought this up is a moron because the matter is not whether this has been done elsewhere and how many other people are doing it. After all, it is my considered opinion that to justify one’s own stupidity / fault simply because it happens elsewhere is almost as good as saying consumption of shit is acceptable because a dog eats its own shit. (That incidentally, is also how I viewed the corruption allegations Chen Shui-bian made against anyone else. Is he trying to justify what he did as right if 100 workers out there stole money while on their jobs? Or because these people went unpunished thus he shouldn’t be punished as well? The Taiwanese courts should make an example of him by punishing him severely, so that it serves as a deterrence to future offenders.)

Anyway, mentioning that the addition of melamine was done elsewhere raise new questions. For e.g. Who taught these farmers to add melamine to their milk? And do these farmers even know what melamine is? I don’t even bother to ask if they were even told of the potential hazards of this ‘ingredient’. It appears that they might even have been told that it is good for the milk as some of us may have read that melamine is added again and again to a batch of milk until it is accepted by a buyer. We may also read about how this ‘extra ingredient’ is routinely added, not only so that the milk passes the protein checks, but to dilute the milk further so that even more dairy products can be made.

Clearly, even if the idea did come from overseas, some people must have had taught these farmers to add it, and also introduced, and perhaps even promote, it to the milk and diary products producers for use. Whoever these people are, they had the opportunity to go overseas to study how milk factories are run. They could even possibly be members of the Communist Party itself, and some of those which were chosen as a ‘pilot’ batch of ‘entrepreneurs’ under Deng Xiaoping’s economic reforms, which proposed allowing certain elements within China to become rich first.

Thus, when Sanlu [三鹿], one of the main culprits of melamine-tainted milk hastily declared bankruptcy, and when the provincial courts of Hubei throws out the court case against Sanlu, I can’t help but wonder if there are some forces behind wanting a quick closure to the matter to prevent a more lengthy and detailed investigation so as to protect some of these people.

On Fake Eggs

There have been reports of fake eggs sold in China, and even making their way into Hong Kong. Fortunately the reports are fake. But during the chat we looked at the matter in detail and it doesn’t need a genius to figure out that these reports are fake.

First of all, faking an egg is definitely a complicated process – you have to first make the shell, then put in the chemicals resembling the egg white and york into the fake shell before sealing it without anything to give it away on close examination.

If produced manually, it is going to be labour intensive and there is no reason whatsoever to even manufacture a fake one unless prices of real eggs are really high enough to justify their production. Even so, there isn’t much money to be made unless a large quantity is being produced.

But beyond that, the eggs of birds are themselves an interesting and odd object in nature. Consider this: most things melt or vaporise when heated, while some might simply ignite and burn. However, the egg white and york solidify when heated, and the translucent, liquid egg white even turns white after solidification. On top of which, the egg york itself turns yellow.

I must ask, offhand, do you know of anything that behave the same way when heated? Even if the news of fake eggs is true, some effort in ‘research and development’ would have been put into this to discover the chemical compound with similar properties, so that your egg won’t give you away when cooked. Most importantly, if such a chemical compound even exists, it must be cheap and readily available or else the cost of making fake eggs would be too high!

Of course one can just ignore the part about it behaving the same way as a real egg when cooked, if one only intend to pull a fast one. Either way, the complicated process behind making even one fake egg, is clearly not something any simple chicken farmer could have imagined on his own.

On Human Trafficking

I once wrote to the Straits Stooge Times Forum regarding the matter of controlling the ‘proliferation’ of streetwalkers in Geylang.

In the letter I pointed out that these girls definitely didn’t wake up one day and decided to come to Singapore to be a streetwalker. Obviously someone coerced or enticed them into coming. I further pointed out that the problem itself has 2 heads – one here in Singapore, and the other in the originating country. On this end, the people would assist in getting social visit pass extensions or student visas, provide lodging and also link them up with the pimps in Geylang. On the other end someone would be assisting them in making arrangements to depart their host nation.

The Stooge Times published my letter then (I can’t find it online – unfortunately) and there was even a reply from the Singapore Police Force, which assured me that there is no human trafficking problems in Singapore.

I suspect their definition of human trafficking was either different from mine or that they don’t think the number of females repeatedly caught soliciting in Geylang indicates a concerted and organised effort to bring them into Singapore. It is not just a handful of of them finding their way here, but easily a hundred of streetwalkers present in Geylang every night. You can check out the videos posted by this guy on Youtube to see just how bad the problem really is.

Whatever the case is, my basis in defining it as human trafficking is as follow:

The main motive of a woman (in some cases an underage girl) to accept an offer from a trafficker is better financial opportunities for herself or her family. In many cases traffickers initially offer ‘legitimate’ work or the promise of an opportunity to study. The main types of work offered are in the catering and hotel industry, in bars and clubs, modeling contracts, or au pair work. Traffickers sometimes use offers of marriage, threats, intimidation and kidnapping as means of obtaining victims. In the majority of cases, the women end up in prostitution. Also some (migrating) prostitutes become victims of human trafficking. Some women know they will be working as prostitutes, but they have an inaccurate view of the circumstances and the conditions of the work in their country of destination. [Source: Wikipedia]

Now, regardless of whether these girls are just playing up to our sympathy of their plight or not, it is pretty common to hear some of these girls talk about being offered legitimate employment here in the first place – for e.g. as dish washers and waitresses etc. Most of them discover upon arrival that they can’t find work here on social visit pass or on student visas. By then they are already in debt, having paid thousands of dollars to ‘intermediaries’ who ‘assisted’ them to travel out of their homeland – way above and in excess of what they had to pay for had they knew how to do so on their own. Many of these end up working in sleazy night clubs or as streetwalkers to repay their debt when they discovered it is impossible to obtain any kind of employment permits from the Ministry of Manpower.

The money they earn will not only go to pay their debt, but will also pay for their lodgings here. On top of which, according to friends who have frequented streetwalkers in Geylang, I was told that when the girls arrive at their usual ‘station’ in Geylang, the look-outs are paid a certain fee. These look-outs are supposed to protect them, provide time-keeping when they serve a customer and also to give them early warning of police raids. In fact, for their time-keeping services, these look-outs receive a ‘commission’ for every customer the girls served while they serve as ‘condom dispensers’, selling cheap condoms for a profit to the customers.

Also, if these girls are on social visit passes, they are charged for arrangements to get theirs extended – normally by arranging them to travel out of Singapore and then back. These ‘charges’ drive the girls further into debt so to keep them in the trade. It is a hole that only gets deeper as time goes on, and the girls will never be able to get themselves out.

I do not deny that some of these girls might be here on their own freewill and work as streetwalkers for their own materialistic pursuits. But if any of the above is happening, then it all fits the description of human trafficking and some serious efforts should be made to deal with this issue.

On top of which, I have friends in China – especially female – who claims they experienced difficulty in getting visas to come to Singapore again. It seems like this serves as some kind of measure to deal with the ‘Geylang problem’. Apart from that, two people I knew, who married Vietnamese ladies, were unable to obtain long stay visas for them originally even when they are legally married at the Registrar of Marriages.

In short, this problem is now affecting even people living outside Geylang, and legitimate tourists. I wondered when, will the police take some real action about this problem instead of sticking their head int the ground and continue to behave as it there is no problem at all.


Comics:

Market Outlook 2009


Recommended Reads:
Dee Kay Dot As Gee: My 4 mentors in Entrepreneurship
Endoh’s Dungeon: DBS – Dreadful Bank Services
Singaporean Skeptic: One Protest at Raffles Place is more Effective than a Hundred Protests at Hong Lim Park
The Online Citizen: A look back on things said in 2008

Daily Discourse – 1.5% GST = Free Public Transport?

Here is the video of ‘kindergarten teacher’ Raymond Lemon Lim lecturing the ‘kids’ of MacPherson about transportation fares and subsidies.

So, it’s 1.5% more in GST for free transportation. This comes from the horse’s mouth and I didn’t make it up.

Let me do a simple calculation here, kindergarten style, ok?

  • If annual income is $50,000, disposable income = $40,000 after CPF.
  • 1.5% of $40,000 = $600. (That’s if you spend every cent you earn.)
  • $600 a year = $50 a month.

I top up my Ez-Link ItchyLink card at least twice a month, and each time it’s at least $30. Each trip is $1.64 and since I work at least 22 days a month that means $72.16 in transportation for the month. So by paying 1.5% more in GST I actually save $22.16 if I earn $50,000 p.a.

Frankly, going by Raymond Lim’s figures, I think anyone who earns less than 50K and takes public transport should take up his offer. Remember, the lesser you earn, the lesser in GST you can possibly pay. (Don’t flame me for this… this is the same method used by the government gahmen to justify the amount of GST goodies given to you was sufficient to cover the GST hike!)

After all, when you earn only $20,000 p.a., then the disposable income you have is $16,000. And if you spend all that $16,000 you earned, 1.5% on that is only $240 a year ($20 a month!!). In short, the more mode of transport you need to use, 1.5% of GST for free transport is exactly the ‘plan’ for you!!

But where’s the catch? The catch is, they will now increase GST annually! Every man can figure that out even by using the head of their one-eyed bandit to think. And that’s not mentioning that the service standards will be any better than the almost non-existent ones now. In short, it might even get worse since they are going to say: “It’s free, don’t complain!”

And you mean you don’t know the Tali-PAP’s modus operandi by now?


Comics:


Recommended Reads:
[)1$(µ$$ 7#3 ||37: Ambiguity Cost Me $10
Information Read By Me: Do 44% find tripartite guidelines Not Realistic?
三十而慄: 馬多夫效應,華爾街其實比恐怖份子還可怕…
Singapore Window: Singapore seen emerging Asia’s weakest economy

Video: Drama at the Singapore Flyer

Frankly, I don’t know what to say about the Singapore Flyer Fiasco. It’s probably another first for Singapore, and two firsts at one go too. A first in having a large ferris wheel – the largest in the world – not to mention a supposed tourist attraction, having a major failure in less than one year. Then, another first in having people trapped in it for six solid hours before they get things moving again!

And since a picture says a thousand words, I’ll let this video express how I felt really about the entire incident.


Comics:


Recommended Reads:
Endoh’s Dungeon: Pakistan is innocent… or not?

Daily Discourse – CPF Cuts Ruled Out

Wah seh… they haven’t make decision to cut CPF and someone actually said it’s not needed!

CPF cut not needed for now
Other tools available with Singapore’s flexible wage system
By Zakir Hussain

FORMER labour chief Lim Boon Heng has ruled out cuts to Central Provident Fund contribution rates for now, saying that a range of measures already in place can be used to trim wage and business costs here.

Chief among them is the flexible wage system, which allows firms to keep salaries in line with economic conditions and avoid layoffs by adjusting the variable components and bonuses.

He told some 800 unionists on Friday that the wage system had been made more flexible precisely to help firms and workers in dire times like the present.

‘We have learnt from past recessions that the use of the CPF cut is a blunt instrument,’ said Mr Lim, who is Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office, referring to how employers’ contribution rates had been slashed in previous severe downturns.

His remarks, released to the media yesterday, came after the National Wages Council (NWC) said last Tuesday that in the light of the worsening global economic crisis, it would reconvene next month to revise guidelines it set earlier this year.

That announcement prompted speculation among some economists that measures such as a cut in contribution rates to the CPF, the national social security savings plan, might not be far behind.

‘I have a view on this,’ Mr Lim said when he quashed speculation about a rate cut at the 27th anniversary dinner of the Singapore Industrial & Services Employees’ Union (Siseu), the second-largest union here with 55,000 members.

A flexible wage system had been developed over the years, he noted. For rank-and-file workers, 20 percent of their annual pay was in flexible bonuses and 10 percent was in the monthly variable component (MVC) that can be cut in difficult times.

For executives and managers, the flexible component is even higher, he noted.

‘Therefore, there is already a lot that can be done to trim wage costs. Apart from using the flexible wage system, companies can also use a shorter work-week,’ he argued.

‘We developed this flexibility so that we do not need to use the CPF cut. We should therefore see how the flexible wage system works in this downturn. A CPF cut is not justified at this point in time.’

The total CPF contribution rate for employees aged 35 and below is 34.5 percent, with employers putting in 14.5 percent.

Thereafter, contribution rates on both sides vary according to age and income.

The last time the employers’ contribution rate was cut was in October 2003 after the Sars crisis. It was reduced from 16 percent to 13 percent. This was then restored to 14.5 percent in July last year.

Mr Lim acknowledged that companies need to trim costs to survive the downturn, but said Singapore was fortunate to have built up a flexible wage system.

‘Bonuses can be cut. The MVC can also be cut if needed. Other measures include a shorter work-week with corresponding reductions in wages,’ he said.

‘This is our advantage. There is no other country I know that has such a range of options open to employers, with unions that are willing to support such measures.’

His view on CPF cuts was acknowledged by Siseu general secretary Lim Kuang Beng, and Singapore National Employers Federation executive director Koh Juan Kiat.

Siseu’s Mr Lim, addressing the point that a CPF cut was a blunt instrument, said that when employers’ contributions were cut previously, workers had to fork out extra cash to pay their mortgages, while others saw a shortfall in their retirement savings.

‘Cutting CPF does not make sense. In fact everything will go haywire especially in a recession,’ he said.

Mr Koh said that the variable components now constitute ‘a significant portion’ of total salaries: ‘We have built these up over the years precisely for times like these.’

According to the NWC, 84 percent of private sector workers are under some form of flexible wage system.

Citigroup economist Kit Wei Zheng said policymakers were more aware that while past CPF cuts may have saved jobs, they can hurt consumption even more because homeowners who rely on CPF for their home loans would have to use more cash and thus have less to spend.

Sounds good?

Still, I just find it really funny that now ‘cutting CPF does not make sense’ because during the last recession, it was cut by 10 percentage points without much of a thought! And guess what? I think less than 3/4 of that has been restored during the good years!

Also, please don’t be too happy yet, because I am going to throw some cold water here. First of all, none of that is set in stone so it might still be cut.

Next, when they say they don’t need to cut CPF contributions, it could also mean they have no clue at all just how bad this recession is. It furthers reinforce my lack of confidence in this generation of leaders lead-duhs’ handling of the crisis.

However, giving them the benefit of doubt, it is unlikely that our mini$ter$ in their ivory towers are still not convinced that the economy is already in the dumps. The real case maybe that further cuts might bring about another serious problem – an impact to the ability for the CPF to payout to the people who are now eligible to draw out their money.

I will not go into the details of that since I am only speculating. After all, one can only speculate how much of our CPF money is being used by the GSIC [Government Gahmen of Singapore Investment Corporation] and Temasek for their investments. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that the gahmen is now having two holes (i.e. old folks drawing out the CPF and capital loss by Temasek) with only one cover (CPF contributions) to cover them.

So, cutting CPF contribution would be equal to making the cover smaller at this point of time. Would they be so dumb to do that?

Above which, like Lim has pointed out, cutting CPF would also mean some people will now mean topping up with cash to service their loans, which will thus reduce the disposable income and in effect, consumer spending. While he is right to say that the economy will go haywire because of that, yet again he doesn’t elaborate on that.

However, if they are really concerned about not causing a further collapse in consumer spending to worsen the economy, it is a surprise that they refused to even consider reducing GST back to 5% or even less to ease off some of that burden consumers are bearing. After all, if they needed consumer spending to keep the economy from sinking further, that would go some way to boost consumer spending, wouldn’t it?

Or perhaps, GST is the other cover that the gahmen needed for some other holes (i.e. losses and deficits) we don’t even know about?


Comics:


Recommended Reads
Mistress Mia.com: Chris Brogan Firestorm Begs a Big Question

Daily Discourse – Christmas

It was really never stated in the Scriptures the exact day of birth of Jesus Christ and thus Christmas Day does not have much significance to me. (Similarly, Good Friday itself also does not held any significance to me because the day of Jesus’ crucifixion should be remembered along with the Jewish Passover, as it was clearly stated in the Scriptures.)

However, someone did point out that it would still be within the month of December according to his understanding of the scriptures even though December 25th is not thought to be Jesus’ actual date of birth. The date itself may have been chosen to correspond with a Roman festival, or the winter solstice, which in ancient times was marked on December 25. [1].

A friend said this about Valentine’s Day, Mother’s Day and Father’s Day: If this is the only day you remember of your wife or girlfriend, mother and father respectively, then it is truly a sad day for them. Similarly, I would say this – It would truly be a sad day for Jesus if Christmas is the only day you remember Him.

So, when was the last time you spoke to God in prayer? And when you spoke to God, what was it about? You do not have to tell me, because this is a private conversation between you and God.

However, you must ask yourself, whether the only things you have spoken to God about lately is only your financial wants or your worries about employment. Well, while there is nothing wrong to ask of our loving Father of such, do you also speak to God about other matters? Or, in the conversation with Him, do you also stop and listen and allow His Holy Spirit to speak? Do you ever allow Him to tell you about yours sins or those things which are unacceptable to Him?

On reflection, one of my greatest failures is that I only to go on my knees and ‘petition’ God, to speak of my concerns, my worries, my desires. I have seldom nor rarely stop and wait for Him to speak, for Him to tell me about His opinion on what He wants me to do about some bitterness over some issues or people, or even His opinion about an early morning rant I have made.

I felt a little ashamed to have called Jesus a friend, not because I am ashamed of Him, but because I have always done the talking and almost never allowed or wait for Him to talk. I simply… talked too much and have stopped to reflect on whether I have really walked together with Jesus.

So even though Christmas day isn’t the only day we should remember our Lord and Savior, I took the opportunity to reflect once again the true meaning of His first coming. Let me share this song, which brother Isaiah has shared with me.


Comics:

1 58 59 60 61 62 186