Challenges to the Evolution Theory

Since Charles Darwin published ‘On the Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection’ on 24 November 1859, the world has believed that this is the only plausible explanation for the origins of life and the bio-diversity of our planet.

In it, Darwin himself said this:

If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.

Once, I have shown such an example – The Eye – by a scientist showing why the theory should already have been discarded. And this is only just one of the examples.

Unfortunately, challenges to the evolution theory is often just written off. If you are a scientist, you end up as an outcast, ridiculed by your own community. If you happen to be religious (usually Christian) and not a scientist, you are disregarded for being unlearned and disqualified to debate the issue, much like a priesthood would have disregarded the heathen or the infidels for not knowing better. The layman is generally expected to accept the theory as truth and never to question it.

But why are we denied our right to question it? If it is truly science and the purpose of science is to explain things by means of examining the evidence or through experiments, then anyone should be allowed to examine the evidence and ask questions. Now, consider even something like the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). A rap – technically a simplify version to explain the purpose behind its construction and what it is trying to prove – was made. And was it that hard for you to understand that?

A lot of science we learn it class can be proven with experiments – e.g. the deflection of light when moving through a denser object, the relation of mass and volume etc. Yet a lot of the alleged proves and support to the evolution theory are rarely examined if true. For example, some bones of a small creature the size of a mouse deer was discovered, and promptly called the ancestor of a whale. Where are the facts that the layman can examine to verify its truthfulness?

So, let us examine the evidence further. The following series of Youtube videos shows another such objection and challenge to the evolution theory. (Please refrain from watching them if you object to the Intelligent Design theory.)

  1. Unlocking The Mystery Of Life #1
  2. Unlocking The Mystery Of Life #2
  3. Unlocking The Mystery Of Life #3
  4. Unlocking The Mystery Of Life #4
  5. Unlocking The Mystery Of Life #5
  6. Unlocking The Mystery Of Life #6
  7. Unlocking The Mystery Of Life #7

China’s First Spacewalk

I personally have no interest in the F1. Whatever benefits there might be, I am certainly not seeing any of it. In fact, I agree very much with Ovidia Yu’s opinion about it.

What I do see is the problems. I can no longer walk after work from Collyer Quay to meet my friend for dinner at Marina Square, and I couldn’t take the DHL Balloon because it was flying an ad for SingTel during the F1 event. In other words I may never experience that balloon as by the end of this month it will be gone from Singapore, forever. Damn you, F1! Please fxxk off and die!

I am happier watching China’s First Spacewalk. In spite of the current problems surrounding dairy products coming out of China, which I would spit on those responsible mainlanders for being profit driven to the point of being unscrupulous and immoral, I still felt a little proud as a person of Chinese descent to see China’s success in space. Here, I embed the video for those who maybe interested.

[TGIF] Friday Morning Craps

This was what I said to the chillycraps this morning in my attempt to ‘out-crap’ him. I told him that the Tali-PAP government gahmen should just hire me as the PR Minister for $300,000 a year (1/10 of what our PM is paid) and I’ll make Singaporeans far less unhappy with the ERP, the seemingly always rising power tariffs and the controversy surrounding the housing subsidies. Basically, I will be the best lackey and supporter this gahmen has ever known if they would pay me that kind of money. Here’s the details of my craps:

  1. ERP

    First of all, drop that nonsense about the ERP being a measure for easing congestions. The sooner the people are told that ERP is to car usage just like GST is to spending, the better. Easing congestion can be the secondary objective of the ERP, but if the people are really dying for the gahmen to deal with the road congestion problems, then the number of new cars will be limited and they shouldn’t complain when they can’t get a COE to buy one. And try an imagine your fellow Singaporean making a living by being a car salesman. The poor guy is gonna eat grass very soon!

    In short, the ERP is nothing more than an attrition tax just like your road tax. Not only that, ERP is a far more elegant system compared to the current road tax system whereby only owners of vehicles are paying for the maintenance and construction of roads. You use the roads more, you pay more ERP because you wear down the roads more. Can we find a fairer system than the ERP where all road users and not just car owners are taxed? Is it fair that only car owners are paying for it?

    If you have better ideas, tell me!

  2. Electricity Tariffs

    It is not true that your electricity tariffs only goes up but never come down in tandem with oil prices.

    Here are the facts: In June 30th 2006, crude prices was US$74.15 at its highest, and electricity tariffs per kWh is S$0.2115 on July 1st. On April 1st, 2008, crude prices was US$105.10 at its highest, and electric tariffs per kWh is S$0.2388. When you take these figures into consideration, the percentage difference of crude prices between June 2006 and April 2008 is 29.44%, but the percentage difference of electric tariffs is 11.43%, not even half of the fluctuation in oil prices!

    Thus, if you chart oil prices and electric tariffs over all these years, you might actually notice that overall, while both lines will show an upward trend, the 2 lines do not exactly have the same gradient. In simpler terms, oil prices rises more steeply than our electric tariffs. In short, when prices shoot up, you are almost enjoying some kind of subsidies, but when the prices come down, you are just paying more so you won’t have to pay more in the next price spike of crude oil!

    Come on, Singapore! Be reasonable!!

  3. Housing Subsidies

    Look at your HDB flat prices from a different perspective!

    Quit listening from Chiam See Tong and the opposition and free yourself from suffering! Stop griping over the fact that tje cost used for the construction of each unit is far lower than the price it was sold to you, and stop feeling indignant over the figures seemingly pulled out of thin air to justify the cost of the land!

    The fact is, when you consider any kind of pension fund in any part of the world, it is always the case that the younger generation will pay into the fund so the older ones can draw it out when they reach the magic age.

    Now, after you have paid out of your CPF to buy that house, while funds in the CPF is paid interest, do you not want that money you paid for your HDB flat to also rise in value? Can’t you all see what we are doing here? Is that so hard to imagine?

    Singaporeans, you have wounded your caring and loving gahmen deeply. You should be ashamed of yourself!

Ok.. enough craps for one day. Don’t kill me if my logic is flawed. It’s all done for laughs and if you enjoyed it, I am happy for you. But should you find this perfectly reasonable and logical, I am also happy for you.

Have a good weekend ahead!

Just ranting…

I had a conversation with a fellow blogger earlier today on Windows Live Messenger, and we talked about some bloggers being hard up for publicity events. In it I mentioned that such events may never obtain the kind of success locally as it had elsewhere.

For starters, I told him I felt that way because I ain’t really interested in such blogger’s events. I also have a very small social circle as far as bloggers are concerned so it is even more unlikely I will be invited. Most of my friends and acquaintances are known primarily through more conventional means – e.g. in gatherings and functions or from courses and friend / colleague introductions. I also have to admit my blog is hardly interesting nor does it have the reach and audience base to warrant any attention. Furthermore, I find certain people active in Internet PR or social media hypocritical, pompous, shallow and repulsive (and that feeling is mutual). It sometimes give one the feeling they are more interested in gathering personal power or pursuing a personal agenda instead of doing what they claimed to be doing.

Not being sour grapes here (since I was lucky to be invited to two of the events), it appears to me that all these publicity activities are not very successful nor useful anyway when one consider the effect of the event vs effort put into the event.

First of all, I see a lot of the same old faces attending these events and thus only they write about them. And surprisingly, the more well known local bloggers are normally never present in these events. One may argue that the objective is achieved more by the quantity and not necessarily by the quality of the bloggers invited. But some bloggers really wrote nothing meaningful or useful of the event. Many a time, when one look at their posts, their knowledge of the event / product is obviously questionable, not to mention also their main objective of attending the event. In the worst case scenario, the entire ‘report’ can sometimes be nothing more than an orgy of cam-whoring. And in one such example, the photos only caught my attention because of Wong Lilin, and by then my attention is no longer on the event itself.

As far as that particular event is concerned, the organiser can some what be blamed for giving the wrong impression to those invited. If I am not wrong, dk told me that Mediacorp and SPH thought a TV series is being launched and sent the reporters for entertainment instead of the ones for gadgets. In the end those reporters end up focusing on the celebrities who are present. But what sealed its fate is when whatever bloggers’ reports produced also failed to pass on the relevant information.

Now, that’s only one of the ways how a publicity event fails to meet its objectives. In some other cases it may simply be just attendees not even writing about the event after attending. You will come to know they are there but didn’t blog because you see them in the photos of other bloggers. And that shows another serious problem… what happens if they maybe the only people reading one another’s blogs actively and constantly, with not much real traffic beyond that?

Anyway, can we blame the bloggers for not blogging about the event when they also have a life of their own beyond? After all, it was never explicit that a blogger must write about the event after they have attended. But it is my considered opinion that failing to do so would defeat the objective of the event – i.e. to have bloggers participate in the publicity drive and to reach out to their readers.

So, the combination of freeloaders at events, the lack of quality reports from attendees, plus the possibility that everyone is only linking to everyone else who are present at the event, would be sufficient enough to kill such events locally.

Consider then.. how to build a reputation as some one who can effectively utilise this form of media, when sooner or later it becomes obvious to corporates and companies that the reach from this is not only negligible but their writings (just like my piece here) are really worth shit on their own to be of any good? Where only the bottom line matters, why should more money and effort be spent to take seriously such ‘outreach’ programs locally?

Movie: Wall.E

This is not so much a review of the movie, but rather a personal view after watching it. In my opinion, Wall.E is a love story with a secondary message to environmentalism and healthy living.

First of all, robot Wall.E’s single-mindedness, and selflessness in expressing his love for robot EVE by assisting her in completing her mission – even to the verge of death – is the ultimate expression of love. To love, is highest expression of the meaning of one’s existence. Just how many will give up what they are doing – even their lives and jobs – so the very person they loved can achieve their goals in life today?

It is no wonder some found Wall.E a little lacking in terms of hilarity, because for all intentions and purposes, being funny and hilarious isn’t the main objective or story of Wall.E itself.

Yet beyond the love story that’s going on between EVE and Wall.E, one must ask, are the humans on the spaceliner Axiom truly living? They can barely walk on their own two feet, and hardly interact with one another. This is most aptly displayed by the fact that two of the guys were talking to the holograms even when they are floating beside one another without even knowing it.

They are flooded with so much information, but a lot of important things pass them by without them knowing that it ever existed – e.g. the pool, the running tracks to prevent them from bone loss. They expect to be spoon-fed everything and yet lost the ability to fend for themselves. It is obvious their lives change with whatever the mass media says, and they can’t go on without the aid of robots. Is this not what we have already become mentally these days, just not physically? Just ask yourself this when you see the next person trying to be what their idols have become, the one talking animatedly over his mobile phone but yet oblivious of everyone else around them, the next moron blasting away his walkman phone on the MRT, or your colleague sitting in the next cubicle sending you an email to ask you for something.

Yet in spite of being driven from Earth for the mess they have created to turn our home planet into a toxic wasteland, they do not seem to have understood that for the entire 700 years living on the Axiom. They continue to live a life of consumerism and produced a huge amount of waste. Is this where we are heading? Are we seeding our own doom with our current lifestyle? Or do we heed this hidden message in Wall.E to start looking at how we could change our consumption habits, before it is too late for us to save ourselves, and even our planet?

When one truly understands the message of Wall.E, one should look back and re-evaluate their lives. Have we been truly living our lives? Who, have we loved and what have we done for them today? Kudos to Pixar for bringing to us yet another thought provoking animation and making animation no longer something that is just for kids, but relevant to us adults as well!

1 67 68 69 70 71 186