An Uneventful Week (20th – 26th July)

The past week has been pretty uneventful except maybe for a corny attempt at joking by one blogger which has caused some unhappiness and distress to two other bloggers. Other than that, the furor over a particular blog aggregator has basically died down just like the Chinese Civil War – no truce, no peace, no nothing. Basically, there is really nothing more to talk about and no more flesh left on a dead horse to flog until yet another is killed to provide more entertainment, much like the Romans have their usual gladiator battles in the Colosseum to entertain themselves.

However, before the week was out a very small matter occurred which requires me to make certain things clear. It is generally agreed among my friends and associates that facts are distorted, then the matter should be set straight, unless the person is a moral coward, imagines he is the Almighty God, or the allegations are so true he can’t refute them.

So firstly, there has been rumors that I have a ‘plan’ to attack the blog aggregator by ‘getting people out of the community’ . This is one of the most ludicrous remark I have heard in a long time. The reason being it has been my stand that there is no community because a community means interaction between its constituents and participation. If there are 3000 people in a place but more than 96% of the constituents do not even actively interact or participate in its activities, then all these talk about a community is nothing but a figment of imagination of a delusional mind. That’s not mentioning – get the people out to where? Just who the hell will come out to… nowhere?

Next, I have on several occasions chat with certain acquaintances and friends about the strength and weakness of the blog aggregator in question, and even spoke about possible ‘vector of attacks’ to exploit certain weaknesses, but no concrete plans have ever come about from these chats. I have never insisted anyone act on them, nor do I harbour any delusions that anyone would act upon them. Above which, the participants in these chats are professionals and matured adults and it makes me wonder if it is because the person making the allegations is weak-minded on her own to even imagine that there are people out there who would be as easily swayed.

Anyway, this isn’t going to be yet another post about some blog aggregator’s so-called ‘community’ or any particular person (those have been done on 21st July and 19th July respectively, and I have already closed the chapter even when someone was still sore and talking about it on Plurk last Friday as if I am still at it). This is more about my personal experience of the true meaning of a particular individual’s vaunted ‘neutrality’ , which translates as – I am neutral as long as you accept what I suggest you should do about this matter. Or else…

And this person has made the above allegations without a single nuance of evidence, much like how dk99 was slandered once over coffee after dinner at a coffee shop near Kallang MRT. A testimony that birds of the same feather do indeed flock together.

Let me just say, I can respect a person giving suggestions to resolve the matter in question. I can even accept having a different decision – just ask paced what my stand is over her choice with regard to the furor. However, don’t expect me to accept any suggestions which have no merits at all. Much less after I have pointed that out again and again. In fact, don’t even suggest that anyone has ‘failed to accept criticism’ when you yourself failed to accept the criticisms to your own suggestions. In short, pardon me for feeling rather ironical when you make that accusation.

To end, let me say it is one thing to be ungracious, but another to be despicable. There is nothing wrong with who you want to consort with, but it is morally wrong to profess neutrality on one hand and then take sides in another setting. The ethnic Hokkien have a very specific term for your kind – 狗母蛇 (gau bu zua aka Bitch Snake), and it is definitely quite apt as far as you are concerned.

Now that I have gotten this off my chest, and just in case anyone thinks my blood pressure has shot through the roof, let me share with everybody a hilarious video that Endoh has spent quite a bit of time on.

圆满结束… 真的吗?

圆满结束… 真的吗?(A successful event… is it real?)

就让您的鼠标滑过照片,您自己看吧。旧的面孔似乎没多少… 我看就算是执政的行动党换新血都没那么快。(Just mouseover the photo and see for yourself. There are not many old faces and I personally thinks not even the ruling Tali-PAP has a turnover that fast.)



[ping.sg] Will nocturne be banned?

I was out drinking last night at Brewerks when I received an sms telling me that nocturne has written several posts criticizing Daphne. It was even more amusing that when I accidentally clicked on the favorite (since removed) in my browser, I saw that these posts have gotten into Top 10:

Apparently, nocturne has re-posted his old post on Daphne, and posted an “apology” as well. In either case, nocturne spoke the things about Daphne that probably many people – with the exception of bloggers xueyu82 and a_x – wanted to say but didn’t have the moral courage to do so.

Now the question is, will nocturne enter ping.sg’s Hall of Dishonor – otherwise known as the ‘Ban of Brothers’ for daring to ‘swat the fly on the head of the tiger’ [老虎头上拍苍蝇]? Whatever the end result is, it no longer matters. If nocturne is banned, it simply reinforces what some of us already believed / known as a fact – that the management of ping.sg tolerates no criticisms. If nocturne is not banned, then well, what’s so different in nocturne’s case from that of dk? It begs the question why this is treated as yet another private dispute among bloggers even when certain comments appears to be even more divisive and harmful than dk’s post. I quote:

Let me remind you of the difference between DK and me – I don’t give a shit about your precious ‘community’.

Now, if anyone would allow me, the main justification for dk’s banishment from the Garden of “Pingden” was that he committed the ‘cardinal sin’ of saying he has given up on the community after he had simply pointed out that the thoughtless comments Daphne made can be viewed as divisive.

If the well being of the community is of paramount importance, then is ‘not giving a shit about the community’ not a even more ‘heinous crime’? Why the disparity in treatment for both cases? Why the double standards? It begs the question why dk was made an example of, simply for speaking up at the clearly obvious divisive actions – intentional or not – of Daphne?

Is nocturne going to be spared just because he only blogged and ping his posts and never comment on the forum? Or that he is not really known in real life to most users on ping.sg? Really, when dk was banned, I had actually found it ridiculous that dk gets a denial of service simply because he has ‘given up on the community’ . Frankly, when was ‘community participation’ and ‘concern for the community’ ever a requirement for using ping.sg’s services? Perhaps Uzyn should just ban the rest of the non-active members which just ping their posts for traffic and never participate at all in the community because they did with action what nocturne did with words – I don’t give a shit about your precious ‘community’. And that’s not mentioning all those members without a blog listed in or have their blogs removed from their registered accounts.

Anyway, I will be watching closely the fate of nocturne in this episode because just several days ago, nocturne made history by being the first to have 7 posts (at least when I made the screen capture below) in the Top 10.

And that truly amuses me is because 2 days before that happened, I had a discussion with another blogger about the ‘dk-effect’ (i.e. that posts from dk will always be ponged into the Top 10), and that Uzyn (whom we assumed to be this extraordinary evil genius) has made use of this opportunity to remove dk from ping.sg so some sanity will return to the Top 10.

Apparently, we didn’t consider that other bloggers will move to fill that position and the ‘dk-effect’ will always be permanent feature in ping.sg until the Top 10 is completely removed. We are simply too naive and we have definitely over-estimated in some parts when we had our discussion.

[ping.sg] White Terror

White Terror generally refers to the suppression of dissidents and at times refers to acts of violence carried out by groups in power against their opponents. In which case, such actions have been carried out in ping.sg recently which includes attacks on ‘un-named serious bloggers’ , user banning, silencing of queries and discussions on the forum, and the rallying of support via Plurk and Twitter (and possibly even on instant messenger [im] and sms) against alleged opponents.

Several posts ago when I touched on ping.sg I have shown evidence on an attack (in fact, two attacks) being made on ‘un-named serious bloggers’ to silence those who object to the hijacking and manipulating the Top 10 to drive their own frivolous ‘community discussion’ . We have also experienced recently the banning of a user for voicing out against actions that can be viewed as divisive. As for whatever goes on in Plurk, Twitter, im and sms, that will be difficult to prove. After all, one will not have sms or im messages unless he is a designated recipient, and Twitter either doesn’t keep messages over a certain number of days, or above a certain number. Above which, private timelines on Plurk is not accessible to all though you would be able to glimpse what goes on there from the public Plurks of some of the ‘loyalists’ .

So, the only element that remained of the recent White Terror would be the silencing of discussion and queries on the forum, as you can see from the following screen capture that these thread were locked. In the case of the queries posted, the thread was locked without even so much of an official reply. (The screen capture was made instead of link to the forum itself as threads can be removed during regular purges.)

And these were the queries Endoh and I made in the topic titled Queries. Again, I am reproducing screen captures instead of linking directly to the forum.




What we get for our queries was a deafening silence, and then without even the courtesy of a polite ‘I thank you for your feedback’ reply, or even an answer in private emails, the thread on the forum was unceremoniously locked. If you asked me what message is in there, I would say that’s simply ping.sg’s management’s very own and special ‘just fxxk off and die’ reply. In fact, I seem to recall but was unable to find the muffled cry of another blogger who had mentioned something about an email reply which gist is ‘just shut up and enjoy your free service’ . In other words, no dissent is tolerated, there is no definitely guidelines as to what you can do or cannot do, and that leaves room for further abuse by elements on ping.sg to further their own personal agenda. Not to mention slanderous and libellious comments were left as they were as if they are being endorsed.

Quite a public relations disaster, if you asked me. But there’s nothing more that the users of ping.sg’s service can really do about it. After all, there is no alternative to ping.sg with the same amount of social interaction – and I don’t mean just the exchange of messages on an individual’s shoutbox like that on mybloglog or blogcatalog. I have considered emailing uzyn, but I doubt that will take me anywhere except to enter the records of his bad books.

But for those who have chosen to be out or are already out, just think on the bright side. Being outside the ping.sg community does not make you any lesser a blogger. The ping.sg community is but a part of the bloggers community, and not necessarily even representative of Singaporean blogger community at all. In it, it comes with people blogging out of Malaysia, or foreigners blogging in Singapore, not to mention that the founder and community manager are both Malaysians just working in Singapore.

In short, if the community manager of ping.sg wants to make their community in such a way that only actions or activities endorsed are considered a part of the community, she is free to do whatever she liked. It is of no loss nor impact to the real Singaporean bloggers community as a whole to be outside ping.sg itself because the ‘elites’ of ping.sg is but just a small part of it. In fact, some commercial entities which might be aware of such activities, may even view them negatively and shun the bloggers involved instead of using them.

To emphasise my point, I have noticed that prominent Singaporean blogger Mr. Miyagi also pings his blog on ping.sg but I have never seen his entries making into the ping.sg Top 10 or getting very much attention from the community there. On top of which, the others like Dawn Yang Yawn Dang, Mr. Brown and Xiaxue Xiasuay didn’t even have a presence there. But none of these bloggers are any less popular.

ping.sg’s true success relied somewhat on the willingness of bloggers to make it a community of their own. Many bloggers have over the past spent their time putting in effort to help newbies set up their accounts so their blogs are published, chat with newbies on the shoutbox to welcome them etc out of their goodwill and free time. Simply put, in response to daphnemaia’s list that those bloggers were the most popular and active in the community, the bloggers community at large should just let them now take up the roles which the bloggers not in the list of daphnemaia’s post have assumed without even a single nuance of gratitude or mention.

In fact, just let the decision makers in ping.sg shoulder all those other responsibilities which were formerly assumed by the un-named bloggers alone… and that appears to be what is going on the past week when one looks at the history on the shoutbox anyway.

So, to end my post, be true to yourself and your readers. And you will find sooner or later find a group of loyal readers to your blog. And if no one reads what you write, just don’t take it too hard unless you are trying to make a living out of it.

1 5 6 7 8 9 19