The Stupid Shitty-Porean Award
– that smoker Chang (right) was fined $200 by NEA plainclothes public health inspectors for smoking outside the designated smoking area. When sked if he would be more mindful in the future about lighting up in public places, the odd-job labourer said ‘no’ quite bluntly. In fact, he described the new smoking restrictions as ‘stupid’. (They should just fine him $200 x 365 and allow him to smoke anywhere. If he can’t pay that amount, he should do time in jail.) |
The World This Week
– that even with the additional American troops likely to be deployed in Baghdad under Warmonger Bush’s new war strategy, it may take another ‘two or three years’ for American and Iraqi forces to gain the upper hand in the war, according to the new American operational commander in Iraq. Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno assumed day-to-day command of war operations last month in the first step of a makeover of the American military hierarchy in Iraq. In his first lengthy meeting with reporters, the 52-year-old general struck a cautious note about American prospects, saying much would depend on whether commanders could show enough progress to stem eroding support in the U.S. for the war. (2 or 3 years is almost right. The next President will most likely pull troops out of Iraq anyway.)
– that Warmonger Bush’s announcement that he will pour more troops into Iraq was the last throw of the dice in a misconceived enterprise that has dragged his country, Britain and the Middle East into a nightmare. The package includes 17,500 more combat troops for Baghdad and 4,000 more marines for Anbar province, the cockpit of the Sunni insurgency. Over US$1 billion will be spent in economic aid. In return, the Iraqis are to promise to crackdown on insurgents, regardless of sect or religion. (Just do the right thing and pull the troops out. Let the Iraqis settle their own sectarian differences by killing one another. The rest of the world should just stand back and watch nonchalantly.)
– that Hanoi Jane took the stage for her first anti-war demonstration in 34 years as thousands massed in Washington to demand that Congress cut off funds for the Iraq war. “I haven’t spoken at an anti-war rally for 34 years,” said Hanoi Jane, whose visit to Hanoi in 1972 outraged many pro-war Americans and damaged her reputation as an actress. “But silence is no longer an option,” she said to cheering protesters. (* Yawn * The American people’s silence is not an option. Yours is, Hanoi Jane. That is, if you have any shame at all!)
– that Hugo Chavez plans a new ‘luxury’ tax on everything from second homes to art collections, and the rich will undoubtedly feel the pinch. (That’s what the GST should be all about if it is really meant to help the lower income.)
– that an ‘Islamic’ cleric’s mockery of the convict ancestry of many white Australians met Friday with a mixture of amusement and anger from the gover-min.John Howard laughed off the jibe by the controversial Mufti of Australia, Sheikh Shit Taj Aldin al-Hilali, but some of his ministers suggested the cleric should leave the country. “The Anglo-Saxons arrived in Australia in shackles. We [Muslims] came as free people. We bought our own tickets. We are entitled to Australia more than they are,” he said. (Right. But not the present generation, you fxxking a**hole. Above which, the Aborigines probably have got more entitlement to Australia than you freaking fundamentalist swines.)
– that Mahmoud Mahbouk Ahmadinejad is in danger of losing the next election due to a greater than ever housing shortage crisis in Iran, especially among the poor and the young, according to a new study. Meir Javedanfar, Iran analyst at Meepas, an Israeli-based independent political and economic analysis company, says in a study published in the current issue of Iran-Pulse that it is now almost impossible for young Teheranis to purchase a home without financial assistance from their parents. (Why would he? It is already impossible for young Singaporeans to purchase a house without financial assistance – i.e. a loan – and do you see the Tali-PAP losing an election?)
– that the execution of Saddam Hussein was rushed to prevent the him from revealing facts that could compromise the U.S., former Russian Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov said. Saddam was executed in an ‘unexpected’ way so ‘he could not have the last word’ and reveal compromising information on the relationship between the U.S. and his former regime, the veteran diplomat said on television. If Saddam ‘had said everything’, ‘the U.S. President would have been greatly embarrassed’, said Mr Primakov. (Intriguing, but Saddam could still have written a diary and passed it to his lawyers to reveal everything. The ‘Unpublished Diaries of Saddam Hussein’ would definitely be a greater hit than that crap from O.J. Simpson.)
– that U.S. forces raided an Iranian consulate in northern Iraq, arresting five diplomats and staff and taking computers and files. The raid, and a buildup of U.S. warships in the Persian Gulf, indicate that the Bush administration is ignoring the advice of the Iraq Study Group (ISG) to reach out to the two neighbors to help quell the violence in Iraq. (Is Warmonger trying to bring on World War III? It is fortunate that there’s only 2 years left in his term.)
– that Pakistan’s tribal areas along the border with Afghanistan have become an accepted haven for al Qaeda lea-duhs such as Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, a senior U.S. intelligence official told CNN. That’s not a formal assessment, the official said, but a growing view by U.S. intelligence analysts in the months since the Pakistani gover-min reached an agreement with tribal authorities to not threaten the region’s autonomy as long as the tribes agreed not to harbor foreigners. (Don’t the U.S. know Musharraf would definitely prefer lesser death threats and attempts on his life?)
– that Warmonger Bush and Tony B-liar are war criminals with more Iraqi blood on their hands than Saddam Hussein, Mama-thir Mohamad said. Mama-thir, one of the developing world’s most strident and veteran critics of the West, launched a shrill attack on Bush and Blair, telling reporters at his Malaysian peace foundation that Bush should face the same ‘sham’ justice as Saddam. (And he should face the same ‘sham’ justice as Anwar Ibrahim.)
– that many foreign companies that have invested in Thailand may soon have to slash their stakes after the military gover-min imposed new restrictions on foreign ownership in the country. Singapore investment company Temasek Holdings will be among those affected by the changes, said Finance Minister Pridiyathorn Devakula. Under the proposed changes, major foreign investors in telecommunications and other sectors deemed vital to national security will have to sell off shareholdings that exceed 50%. (Fire sale! Fire sale! And here comes another Micropolis!)
– that one day after spooking investors with tighter rules on foreign ownership and saying that Singapore investment company Temasek Holdings would be among those affected, the Thai Finance Minister has softened his stand. Pridiyathorn Devakula said Thailand’s gover-min may give foreign investors more time to reduce stakes in local companies. Dow Jones quoted Mr Pridiyathorn as saying that he had made an error when he said telecoms was on List 2 and the impression that Temasek, which acquired Thai telecommunications giant Shin Corp, would now have to reduce its voting rights. Instead, he said that telecommunications companies have been classified under the so-called List 3 sectors. These companies will have to cut their foreign and nominee ownership to less than 50%. But they can still retain control of their assets by keeping their voting rights. (Read: Don’t say we never give you chance!)
– that OPEC, which has already lost billions of dollars due to the recent price decline, has been mulling production curbs to prop up oil prices. Oil may also become dearer overnight if tensions erupt in the troubled Middle East or extreme weather hits energy supplies. “It’s unclear at this point in time whether the recent decline in oil price is sustainable,” said United Overseas Bank treasury economist Thomas Lam. (And whatever made them think that the rise in oil prices were sustainable, huh?)
– that the U.S., Australia and Canada have voiced concerns to China over the first known satellite-killing test in space in more than 20 years, the White House said. “The U.S. believes China’s development and testing of such weapons is inconsistent with the spirit of cooperation that both countries aspire to in the civil space area,” National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe said. “We and other countries have expressed our concern regarding this action to the Chinese.” Using a ground-based medium-range ballistic missile, the test knocked out an aging Chinese weather satellite about 860 kilometers above the earth on Jan. 11 through ‘kinetic impact’, or by slamming into it, Johndroe said. (“The Bush space policy is designed to ‘ensure that space capabilities are available in time to further U.S. national security, homeland security, and foreign policy objectives.’ Moreover, a fundamental goal of the policy is to ‘enable unhindered U.S. operations in and through space to defend our interests there’. Well, so the Chinese had the same idea. What’s America’s problem with that?)
– that China has told a senior U.S. official that a recent test of a Chinese satellite killer missile did not signal a threat to other countries or a bid to militarise space. Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill raised U.S. objections to the test with senior Chinese officials during a visit to Beijing. The Chinese, who had not previously confirmed carrying out the test earlier this month, told Hill ‘this was not a threat against anybody and was not meant to spark a race to militarise space.’ China became the third country after the U.S. and the Soviet Union to shoot down anything in space, after it had destroyed one of its own satellites. (The weapon is there just in case the Americans insist on having the last say in the matter of the final and eventual unification of China.)
– that Shinzo Schizo Abe voiced concern about China’s satellite-destroying test, charging that Beijing had violated international law. “I believe it would not be in compliance with basic international rules such as the Outer Space Treaty,” Abe said in parliament of the Chinese test. The 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty, which bans weapons of mass destruction in space, says that all nations should avoid contamination of space and be held liable for any damage caused. (In that case everyone is in violation. Putting man-made objects into space is ‘contaminating’ space.)
– that when asked if an attack on a Japanese satellite would be an act of war, Abe said: “The international community should be concerned about any destruction of another country’s satellite in a way that does not comply with international laws.” (Actually, detonating a nuke in space would be even more effective than knocking out individual satellites. The only draw back would be you lose even your own satellites.)
– that IMF managing director Rodrigo Rato called for China to be ‘more flexible’ in setting its exchange rates, renewing a demand frequently made by Western nations. “A more flexible exchange rate regime is in the interest of China,” Rato told reporters on a visit to Tokyo. The U.S. and other major industrialised countries accuse China of keeping its yuan artificially low to make cheaper its manufacturing exports which have flooded foreign markets. (Wow. They do know what is in the interest of China better than the Chinese themselves, huh?)
– that Hu Jintao has vowed to ‘purify’ the Internet in a top-level meeting that discussed ways to master the country’s sprawling, unruly online population. The Politburo – its 24-member leading council – was studying China’s Internet, which claimed 137 million registered users at the end of 2006. Hu made it clear that the Communist Party was looking to ensure it keeps control of China’s Internet users, often more interested in salacious pictures, bloodthirsty games and political scandal than Marxist lessons. The party had to ‘strengthen administration and development of our country’s Internet culture’, Hu told the meeting. (There was first the Great China Firewall. It’s time for the Great China Internet Proxy.)
– that Yasukuni said it had revised references to China in a war museum on its premises. The Mainichi said that in a panel about war between Japan and China, a statement blaming ‘Chinese terrorism’ is now accompanied by a statement referring to Japan’s plot at the time to set up a puppet regime near Beijing. But the Mainichi quoted a supervisor at the museum as saying that it had not changed its view of history. (At least it’s a step forward, not backwards. Let us give the Japanese time.)
– that Chen Shui-bian appealed to a group of senior judges to stop the trial of his wife Wu Shu-chen on corruption charges on the grounds that it could jeopardise state secrets, his aide said. “The president should have executive privilege to refuse to offer the court information on defence, foreign affairs and state secrets,” said presidential deputy secretary-general Cho Jung-tai. (Accusation: The prosecutor showed that state funds have been taken and paid out into his wife’s pockets by means of false receipts, and / or that state funds were used to pay for her purchase of luxuries. Objective of trial: To determine that the evidence are in proper order and without dispute and thus to decide on the appropriate punishment. Facts: Chen even claimed that one of the items were a gift to his own wife using those funds. The only state secret that might be jeopardised would be how this unaudited and badly accounted for public funds is being abused.)
– that Chen Shui-bian has maintained the innocence of himself and his wife, who is on trial on corruption and forgery charges. “I want to point out very clearly that not a penny has gone into private pockets. We have used all of the state funds on secret diplomatic work and also on work related to national security,” Chen said. Wu Shu-chen has pleaded not guilty to charges that she illegally claimed NT14.8 million dollars in personal expenses from state affairs funds. (Where does that personal diamond ring fit into secret diplomatic and national security work?)
– that Chen Shui-bian has accused China of ‘provoking’ his gover-min by targeting the island with nearly 1,000 missiles, stepping up the rhetoric against Beijing. Chen insisted that China had put Taiwan on the defensive with its provocative acts, rejecting Beijing’s claims that he was to blame for cross-strait tensions. “It is China that is provoking Taiwan,” Chen said. “It passed the ‘anti-secession law’. It never formally renounced the use of force against Taiwan. It has also begun to complete three-stage preparation work to invade Taiwan in the future. (Chen has a knack of putting the carriage before the horse. No ‘Taiwan Independence’ rhetorics from you, no ‘Anti-Secession Law’ from China, alright?)
– that Chen said he was merely trying to maintain the peaceful status quo in the Taiwan Strait, and hit out at China what he called a massive increase in the number of missiles pointing at the island to 988. “Back in the year 2000, when I first became president, the missiles deployed along the southeastern coast of China were about 200 and now they are almost 1,000. They have increased almost by fivefold.” (If he had kept his big mouth shut, it would have remained at 200.)
– that Thaksin Tham-sim spoke to the Asahi Shimbum, a leading Japanese newspaper, and Kyodo News, which published the interviews. While the Thai military junta had reacted testily after the CNN interview and Tham-sim’s private meeting with S Jayakumar – even cancelling an invitation to Singapore Foreign Minister George Yeo, it has chosen to remain silent so far. Its response to Japan is being far more muted than its reaction to Singapore. (First Mama-thir, then Half-Babie. Now Thailand. Singapore has always been a favourite punching bag of these countries when they have a problem and they got no one to lash out at.)
– that junta lea-duh General Sonthi Boonyaratglin had a voiced his concerns that Singapore could be listening in to confidential calls after Temasek bought Shin Corp, which belonged to the Tham-sim family. (As if Singapore ‘eat finish so free’? [Hokkien: jia bah jin eng, meaning: having too much free time.])
– that a Malaysian official has blamed massive land reclamation by Singapore near the Malaysian mainland for the recent flooding in southern Johor state that left 17 people dead. The reclamation on Pulau Tekong, east of mainland Singapore and opposite the mouth of Malaysia’s Johor river, caused the flooding in December and January that also forced about 100,000 people to be evacuated, said Johor Chief Mini$ter Abdul Ghani Othman. The reclamation led to the narrowing of the mouth of the Johor river, slowing the discharge of excess rain water into the Johor Straits, Othman said. This led to the river bursting its banks in Kota Tinggi, the worst affected town where streets and many homes were submerged. Singapore and Malaysia have for decades shared uneasy relations over a host of irritants, and the fresh and unexpected charge is likely to fuel tensions. Abdul Ghani’s spokespeople could not be immediately reached to confirm the report. There was no immediate reaction from Singapore either. (Well, the next time I have constipation, I’ll blame Othman for the Satay or Nasi Bryani that he has eaten.)
– that the Johor administration has come under increasing pressure in the wake of the floods that killed 17 people and left Malaysia with a massive RM1.5 billion bill – the cost of helping the flood victims and repairing roads and schools. About 30,000 people are still taking shelter at relief centres. Until now the Johor gover-min had not pointed fingers at anybody over the floods. In fact, it had been banking on visitors from Singapore to help bring its economy back on its feet. (Well, it is still banking on Singapore to foot that RM1.5 billion bill – hoping that we will be cowered to pay after they made such irresponsible and unfounded comments.)
– that Singapore’s MND pointed out that a study carried out by Malaysia’s Department of Irrigation and Drainage in 2002 on the impact of the reclamation works showed there were no appreciable changes to the water levels within the Straits of Johor for flood flows. “As such, the study concluded that there is no increased flooding due to Singapore’s reclamation works,” said the MND. Other studies came to similar conclusions. Both gover-mins then accepted that it would not be necessary for the flood impact to be assessed any further. (What maybe flooding with water might be the brains of Abdul Ghani Othman – to the point that he can no longer think logically and talk sense.)
Singapore This Week
– that when Tali-PAP fought the last General Election, it knew that it would push for the Workfare Bonus. But the thought of funding it by raising the GST had not even been discussed at that point. Lao Goh revealed this towards the end of his nine-day trip to Abu Dhabi and Morocco when he was asked if the Tali-PAP tended to come up with unpopular policies – like raising GST – only after it won elections. (Guess what? I really believe Lao Goh… when I am dreaming.)
– that “If the pain is not worth it, we will lose more support at the election,” he said. So far, on every occasion in the past, the pain has been worth it, said Mr Goh. “That’s the beauty of working with Singaporeans. A lot of complaints, but at the end of the day they understand,” he added. (Or rather, the beauty is that they are many suckers for pain who always come back for another helping of shit after whining.)
– that Citigroup Global Markets’ [Singapore] director [Asia-Pacific Economic and Market Analysis] Chua Hak Bin argued that the GST is regressive, which places a bigger burden on the lower-income earners. Ng Eng Hen Eng disagreed, saying: “The interesting thing about our previous GST exercises is that we’ve managed to re-distribute such that GST didn’t become regressive. We actually gave back GST rebates to the bottom 20% equivalent to 11 years’ of GST spending. I think people forget.” (Forget? Is that the reality or just some other figures that you million dollar jokers ‘scientifically conjured’ out of thin air? If that is the case, no one forgot. We simply DISAGREE.)
– that Baby Lee has indicated that the hike in the GST will likely come in a one-off adjustment, and the gover-min is also seriously looking at increasing the employer’s contribution to the CPF. (Better do it now so there can be another hike in another 2 years to 10% and yet leave enough time for Singaporeans to forget before the next election.)
– that Baby Lee said, “Is it better to take your medicine sooner or stretch it out? Take medicine once or two times? I prefer to make my medicine early, why? This is something we need to do, once we have done it, we can move on; we have the resources to have the revenue from the GST that we use, for all the things we want, further investments, etc. If I stretch it out, my revenues come in slower, that means I cannot do all the things I need to now.” (This has got to be the most stupid comment since ‘Mee Siam Mai Hum’. Four reasons. 1. I am not sick, so why should I take medicine? 2. If I have 2 hammers, 1 10lbs, and the other 20lbs, I’ll definitely hit him once with the 20lb hammer instead of hitting him twice with the 10lb hammer, even if the 20lb hammer will kill him right away. 3. When doctor gives Baby Lee medicine for 5 days and ask him to take it 3 times a day, does Baby take it all at one go? Funny he hasn’t yet die from overdose. 4. And GST isn’t medicine. It’s pure and simple poison for those with lower income.)
– that to help fund ‘Workfare’, Baby Lee said the GST has to be raised. Singapore’s GST is set to go up from 5 to 7%. (That’s very funny. The next time Singaporeans should note that when you vote for the Tali-PAP, you are also voting to ‘contribute’ in the funding of whatever hare-brained craps the Tali-PAP is cooking because they have got no means to fund it without your contribution.)
– that Baby Lee also indicated to employers and unionists that future Workfare payouts could see a bigger portion going into the workers’ CPF account. (Right. Take money off our pockets into yours, and move it into another pocket said to contain ‘our money’ which we can’t touch even if we are in a state which we would be better off splattered all over an MRT track.)
– that five years ago, ‘For Sale’ signs lined the lonely stretch of bungalows along Berwick Drive. Even for a steal of a price, the suburban Serangoon Gardens area saw few takers. The economy, shaken by the terror attack in New York, hadn’t yet stepped out of the long shadow of the 1997 Asian financial crisis that crushed banks, businesses and home prices. Today, his street is lively and bustling. Foreigners are returning to the property scene in big way, making their presence felt with large numbers, a diversity of nationalities and a staying power that, at once, strengthens and calms the market. (In the end there will be no more middle-class Singaporeans. In the Tali-PAP utopia, there are 3 classes, the Tali-PAP and the high-class Singaporeans, the foreign talent middle-class, and the educated, well trained, lower-class Singaporean serfs that is the source of manpower for the economy which the Tali-PAP will take full credit for.)
– that the latest economic good news is a glowing report card on the Singapore labour force in 2006. The report, released by the Ministry of Manpower, boasts of the highest employment rate in 15 years, higher salaries and a more qualified workforce. According to the report, 76% of the resident population aged 25 to 64 was employed as of June last year, the highest proportion since the data was first compiled in 1991. The percentage of unemployed residents – those actively looking for jobs but unable to secure any – also dropped to a five-year low. As of last June, the figure was 4.5 per cent, down from 5.6% in 2002. (And there is no better time is there to bring the GST to an all time high of 7% in 13 years, right?)
– that Baby Lee said Temasek Holdings is accountable if its purchase of Thailand’s Shin Shit Corp fails. He spoke in an interview with Reuters on the sidelines of the ASEAN summit in Cebu. Last year, Temasek Holdings led a $3.8 billion acquisition of Shin Corp – a deal which is now said to have dropped in value. Mr Lee said it was a ‘commercial proposition’, and if it did not work out, it would be ‘Temasek’s fault and it has to answer for it’. Reiterating that it was not a gover-min matter, he also said it is premature to talk about losses on the Shin Corp deal. (It would definitely be Temasek’s fault. But would it be Ho Ho Ho’s fault?)
– that Singapore is gearing up to churn out more graduates – and postgraduates – as the country pumps ahead into its next stage of growth in the new economy. Currently, about 23% of the cohort born each year go on to attend university here. Add 17% who pursue their degree course overseas or through distance learning, and the university participation rate stands at about 40%. (Churn out so much why still need ‘foreign talent’?)
– that the Singapore Totalisator Board and the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS) are pumping $7 million into Singapore’s Olympic dream. The idea is to ensure that the athletes who have the potential to win a medal at Beijing 2008 or London 2012 should get the finest support possible. Neither time nor resources should stand in the way. (And what’s the damned point? What good will a gold medal won by an individual in 2008 do for Singapore in 2009?)
– that the lower middle-class households, those in the 30th to 50th percentile, barely saw their wages grow. So once the average inflation rate of 1% to 2% is factored in, it means that the incomes of almost half the population have either fallen or not grown since 2000. (More Good Years! For us, like real only!)
– that the gap is growing and the richest 10% of households – with an average monthly income of $16,480 – saw their wages increase at a healthy clip of 2.8% annually between 2000 and 2005. (Welcome to the Tali-PAP’s elitist, ‘meritocratic’ utopia. * pui *)
– that increases in the pay of civil servants serpents are based on merit, and depend on their performance and potential, Teo Chee Hean said. The pay was also tied to Singapore’s economic climate. He said, “The civil service pay package is adjusted in tandem with economic conditions, to the annual variable component or AVC. The AVC quantum is reduced during periods of slow economic growth and conversely the AVC quantum is increased during good economic growth to ensure civil serpents’ salaries remain competitive with the market.” (Is it? Who else is in with me feeling that civil serpents are getting better bonus payouts than we all in the private sector?)
– that only four in 10 active CPF members – those earning an income – who turned 55 in 2005 had the minimum sum of $90,000 in their CPF at the end of last year. The minimum sum is for retirement needs. For instance, a CPF member will receive monthly payments from his minimum sum when he turns 62, until the funds run out. But more than six in 10 would have accumulated the minimum sum, if not for the fact that members can withdraw half of their CPF balances when they turn 55, said Ng Eng Eng. Responding to Halimah Yacob, Ng said the minimum sum is ‘adequate for subsistence living’ for about 20 years after age 62. (‘Subsistence living’, or ‘barren existence’?)
– that the NKF is claiming about $12 million from Durai and his ‘special friend’ co-defendants that was allegedly wasted on salary increments, failed contracts and loss of donations. The NKF believes it may have lost $4 million in donations following a public outcry against Singapore’s biggest charity scandal, that happened mid-2005. (Ever considered some slimming down like getting rid of that corporate image in spite of being a charity? And that’s not just the NKF alone.)
– that Durai had spent more than $1 million over seven years on hotel stays alone. He also set up a slush fund that was used to get around restrictions on fundraising and donors’ money was wasted on botched IT deals agreed to between Durai and his friends. Durai has rewarded his favourites, like ex-director Matilda Chua, extravagantly with 12-month bonuses anmd evidence that Durai had tried to destroy on his computer was retrieved. (We want a show. We want more dirty linen. We want to be entertained! Why did you quit the case Durai?)
– that during the cross-examination, it was also revealed that former NKF Vice Chairman, Alwyn Lim didn’t have much regard for Yong. Lim is one of the third parties in the case. In an e-mail Lim wrote, he accused Yong of wanting ‘chairmanship so badly that he sold his soul’. The email added that Yong ‘has no substance and his only claim to fame is that he dresses like a dandy’. (There was someone I knew who said he didn’t even like Yong’s looks. Can’t remember the exact comments but it definitely wasn’t something flattering.)
– that the big job of reviewing Singapore’s public transport system – from the nuts and bolts to the service standards – has gone to the Australians. In its first move to rope in an external consultant, the LTA has appointed the Australian arm of U.S.-based consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton for the comprehensive study. Booz Allen Hamilton is expected to submit their findings to the LTA in the middle of this year for review and evaluation. (And the result is still the same. It is still a World ‘Worst Class’ Transport and they will remain clueless why car ownership and usage continue to increase and the people just simply keen on using public transports.)
– that Singapore’s public transport system has been identified as one of the most efficient and enjoyable in the world, on par with Vienna’s and Helsinki’s. (Only when you are a tourist and you don’t use it everyday for your entire life.)
– that this is according to a ‘Mobility in Cities Database’ report released by the International Union of Public Transport (IUTP), said the LTA in a media briefing on full-day bus lanes. (Whatever they say. The LTA, the gover-min, along with the management of the transport operators and their mouthpieces, only need to convince us by using it daily, for only a year.)
– that SingPower, which reviews the tariffs quarterly according to the past three months’ oil prices, recently cut the rate for January-to-March by 1.62 cents to 20.02 cents per kwh. This saves between $1.74 and $6.32 for families living in one-room to five-room flats, SingPower estimates. But unlike current oil prices, the tariff is nowhere near July-2005 levels of 16.06 cents per kwh. (As usual lah. Go up super fast. Come down, you just wait long long because they hope you either never notice the diffference, or got use to it.)
– that when asked why pump prices have not gone down in accordance with oil prices, ExxonMobil Asia-Pacific – the largest retail pump operator here – said crude oil was not the sole determinant for petrol prices. Factors include internationally-traded wholesale petrol prices, costs of storage, and currency exchange rates, said ExxonMobil spokeswoman Eva Ho. (Is that right? The SGD has strengthened. And we really want to know how is cost of storage is not fairly constant, when you technically build and own those things and pays roughly the same for maintaining them? And don’t tell me you don’t have reserves in the first place!)
– that companies may not immediately adjust what they charge because oil prices have been volatile, said energy consultant Victor Shum of Purvin & Gertz. Over the past week, crude prices see-sawed on news that Saudi Arabia – the biggest OPEC member – did not feel further supply cuts were necessary since the market was ‘looking healthy’. (Right. So when it temporarily spiked, why did the companies immediately adjust their prices?)
– that Chiam See Tong kept his word to remind the gover-min of its $80-million upgrading election carrot last year for Potong Pasir residents. He asked what the gover-min was going to do with the sum promised, ‘now that the Government is not releasing it to upgrade the constituency’. In reply, Grace Fu Fool said that as the majority of Potong Pasir voters did not support the plan, ‘the Tali-PAP candidate did not have the mandate to pursue his proposal with the gover-min’. (In that case why isn’t Potong Pasir exempted from the GST increase, since it probably also did not support the idea of ‘Workfare’?)
– that income ceilings are still needed for purchases of subsidised Housing Board flats, but HDB will be flexible if families are in difficulty, said Grace Fool. Income ceilings help ensure that the gover-min’s limited public housing subsidies are given to those who need them more, she added. She was responding to Mr Zaqy Mohamad , who asked if the ministry would review the income ceiling. Now, the household income ceiling for the purchase of a subsidised flat by first-time buyers is $8,000 per month. Extended families buying a subsidised HDB flat to live together enjoy a higher household income ceiling of $12,000 per month. Ms Fu said the limits are ‘generous’, as eight out of 10 Singaporean households have incomes within the ceilings. (Too bad if you are the 2-in-10 who wants to be prudent and not over stretch yourself.)
– that according to Mohd Maliki Osman, some of those media reported cases of Singaporeans who live in void decks, or on the beach – are sometimes ‘homeless by choice rather than due to circumstances beyond their control’. (Interesting. It begs the question, why did they prefer this ‘choice’ in view of Singapore’s – or rather, the Tali-PAP’s – much boasted about ‘economic success’?)
– that Singapore’s history of cooperation among the ‘labour unions’, the gover-min and employers – tripartism – is Singapore’s ‘secret’, and cannot be easily copied. Baby Lee lauded it as one of Singapore’s ‘most sustainable advantages’. (Tripartism is a myth. More like ‘bipartism’ when the gover-min and the unions are actually one since a mini$ter and a member of the ruling party is secretary-general of the congress of trade unions, and only gover-min approved ones at that!)
– that “Our model works only because unionists and workers can see the benefit of working with the gover-min and employers. There is trust and confidence,” said Baby Lee, quoting from an e-mail sent by Halimah Yacob, who is also NTUC’s assistant secretary-general. “Many other countries see us, envy us, want to learn the secret from us, but they can’t so easily copy it,” Baby said at the inaugural Singapore Tripartism Forum. (Trust and confidence? Or just that there is a hand over their mouths and the workers really just have a semblance of a voice, but in reality, no voice at all?)
– the Josephine Teo [MP for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC and executive secretary of the Singapore Industrial and Services Employees’ Union] said, “When meeting unionists from the region and beyond, they often tell us how they feel the model of tripartism is workable and they are quite envious of it. They admire the way we are able to do away with posturing and get down to problem-solving.” (Of course. They will to find ways of controlling the unions. And when unions = gover-min, then there’s not much possibilities for ‘posturing’.)
– that while the future looks tough for taxi drivers, they can earn more by adding value to their services, Baby Lee said. They could double as tourist guides or ferry medical tourists, he suggested. Cabbies have to get creative in making money, for one reason: The gover-min does not intend to limit the number of cabbies by making it tough to get taxi licences, like what some countries do. (Like becoming part-time OKT [Orh Kwee Taus aka pimps] and earn $10,000 a month which the Chinese free sheet ‘My Paper’ [我报] has reported? They just have to pray hard they don’t end up like the pub operators in Joo Chiat.)
– that the Crazy Horse Revue, widely hailed as the Great Entertainment Experiment that would take Singapore’s reputation as a world nightlife centre to the next level, is closing down. The revue, run by public-listed cinema operator Eng Wah Organization, will turn down the lights on the show for the last time on Jan 31, the company announced. It was a victim of poor attendances, leading to losses of more than $3 million, and very strict advertising rules that limited its publicity. Ms Goh Min Yen, Eng Wah’s managing director, said the show at the 400-seater theatre at Clarke Quay has, for the most part, been drawing less than half of the expected 65% attendance. (Had it been allowed to run as freely as the Joo Chiat ‘Vietnam’ pubs, it would have flourished and even prospered.)
– that the Indonesian blanket ban on sand exports, coupled with the impending rise in prices, is unlikely to set back the construction of the Marina Bay Sands Casino. The casino operator confirmed that its budget would not be affected, and said it expects the gove-min to help it secure alternative sources of sand. Construction work on the other casino – Genting International’s Resorts World at Sentosa – could begin as early as April if all goes according to plan. The gover-min gave its reassurance that the permanent ban on sand is unlikely to have any long-term impact on the construction industry. (You can tell who are your friends and who are not. These sore-eyed shitheads around us knows the high hopes we put in these casinos, and they are already doing their bit to make sure we don’t succeed so easily.)
Trivial, Jokes and Thoughts from Discussions
– that in a recently filed lawsuit, Cisco asked a judge to forbid Apple from using the name ‘iPhone’, a Cisco trademark since 2000. The case hinges in part on whether Apple’s phone – a sleek, $499 gizmo unveiled to much fanfare – could confuse shoppers looking to buy Cisco’s iPhones. Attorneys specializing in intellectual property said that Cisco will likely win, if the case goes to court. (If Apple can sue people making iMac lookalikes, Cisco should sue them until bankruptcy for trampling on one of its trademarks.)
– that regulators in Norway have deemed Apple’s iTunes Store illegal in their country because the songs won’t work on anything but an iPod, the Financial Times reported. The report said that Apple has to allow other companies access to iTunes songs by October 1 or further legal action will ensue, which could involve a shutdown of the site if taken all the way. European regulators have been taking a hard look at Apple’s music business recently, with news earlier this week that France and Germany are conducting simliar investigations. (Well done, Norway. All the way!)
– that Apple has so far been able to keep the iTunes Store up and running in Europe, after an attempt by the French to pass a law mandating interoperability failed. The company told the Financial Times that ‘Apple hopes that European gover-mins will encourage a competitive environment that lets innovation thrive, protects intellectual property and allows consumers to decide which products are successful’. (What gross hypocrisy. Why isn’t Apple allow consumers to decide which music store to buy from then? Would that not be allowing them to decide which is more successful?)
– that no one bats an eyelash if you say something critical about Microsoft and Windows. But write anything even faintly judgmental about the Macintosh and in comes a flood of hate mail from Mac users. The worst part is the tone of most, which generally tend toward religious zealotry. (Never stand between the zealot and his dog… oops… I mean ‘god’.)
-that the globally popular online role-playing game World of Warcraft unveiled a new virtual continent to fans. Blizzard Entertainment released ‘The Burning Crusade’ expansion a day earlier in Europe and North America, where a combined total of 3.5 million people subscribe to play the game on the Internet. (* YAWN * Ultima OnLine: Been there, done that, ever since ‘The Second Age’ and ‘Samurai Empire’ several years ago.)
– that McDonald’s Corp. has finally selected a new trans-fat-free oil for cooking its famous french fries after years of testing, the fast-food chain said. While it has developed a healthier new oil, the company is still not saying when it will be used in all 13,700 U.S. restaurants. It already trails competitors in committing to a zero-trans fat oil. (Maybe it’s time to do away with this unhealthy food entirely.)
– that David Beckham had announced that he would join U.S. Major League Soccer’s Los Angeles Galaxy this year, leaving Real Madrid in a deal reported to be worth US$250 million. (Let’s hope that frees up some newspaper space for this part of the world.)
– that the world’s movers and shakers have long debated the likely catastrophic effects of a global crisis triggered by a water shortage. It was even the premise of a television documentary The Water Wars. But international scholar Professor Asit Biswas told an audience of top gover-min officials, academics and water management experts gathered at the LKY School of Public Policy that such a scenario is highly unlikely. Biswas, who heads a think tank in Mexico, the Third World Centre for Water Management, argued that any impending water shortage would be the result of poor water management, not climate change. (Guess what? That can be read as “If you happen to live in a place where there’s abundant water and not affected by climate change while your water management policies don’t end you up with acute water shortages, it’s ‘good water management’.” And that can be misleading.)
– that his thesis struck fertile ground some 18 months ago when he discovered that Singapore had been practising for 40 years what he had been preaching round the world, often to deaf ears. PUB chief executive Khoo Teng Chye said the local water agency provided Prof Biswas with local facts and figures. “We were flattered when he came up with a report that highlighted Singapore’s successful water management,” he said. Prof Biswas’ report has since been read around the world. (He has not taken into account that there are always lea-duhs or politicians of countries which do not have the political will / will not / are unwilling to / are incapable of enacting prudent and good water management policies.)
– that a small area of the brain nestled inside the cerebral cortex might explain why smoking is such a hard habit to break. A new study of 69 smokers with brain injuries showed that those who had damage to the insula often quit smoking suddenly and effortlessly, suggesting that this particular area could be a target for future therapies to help smokers quit. (Find the ways to do it soon. Give me back the fresh air.)
– that 24-year-old Song Yick Biau was described as a ‘lonely’ and ‘socially inept’ man who sought refuge in the internet, where he could take on different personalities. Song had assumed the identities of MSN Messenger users – chatting with their friends and changing their passwords to lock them out of their accounts. He also threatened to post pictures of one victim online, unless she sent him photos of her breasts. (Never heard of porn, Song ‘Boh Nau’? [Boh Nau
– that Justice Liew Thiam Leng passed a deterrent sentence of 27 months in jail, stressing that Song’s act could undermine public confidence in e-communication. (36 months would be better.)
– that the teen who hijacked his neighbour’s Internet access is a loner whose life centred around Internet gaming, the judge presiding over the case said. What the 17-year-old needs is a structured environment for him to change, said District Judge Bala Reddy. With that, he sentenced Garyl Tan Jia Luo to 18 months’ probation, out of which half will be spent in a boys’ home in Bukit Batok. During the other half of the probation period, Tan will be barred from using the Internet and will have to stay indoors from 10pm to 6am. (He should thank the judge for giving him back his life outside the Internet.)