It is System Adminstrator Appreciation Day today. Let me re-dedicate this song from deadtroll.com to all the System Administrators out there doing a thankless and unappreciated job everyday.
Month: July 2008
Movies: Hancock & Wanted
![]() |
As I was on leave today, I went to watch “Hancock” at GV Marina. I would have watched it at GV Jurong Point, but the first show clash with my meet up with my friend (who is also my insurance agent), and the second one is at 10pm. As we already know from watching the trailers, Hancock (Will Smith) is this drunkard, bad ass hero that goes around Los Angeles dealing with the crime and the problems. Unfortunately, when getting the job done, Hancock’s methods usually caused the city a large amount of money in damage. As a result, the people of LA are very upset with his vigilantism even though Hancock participation has kept the crime rate in check. The story revolves around how PR Executive Ray Embrey (Jason Bateman), in gratitude of being saved from certain death by Hancock, take it upon himself to help Hancock remake his image. To do so, Ray set up for Hancock a series of steps to take in order regain the trust and appreciation of the very people he is saving and protecting, and as a result also led Hancock to re-discover something about his true self. How do I like the movie? Well, just like any movie where you get Morgan Freeman, most Will Smith movies can never be too bad. While I did enjoy the early part of the movie very much as it was quite funny looking, especially that part where the criminals Hancock put in jail confronted him when he went to prison. However, I felt it to be a little dry at the middle part when he became our usual prim and proper hero and I definitely didn’t quite like the ending. |
On a scale of 1 – 5, I’ll give 4 for entertainment, 3.5 for story and 3 for ending. And yes, there’s a short “after credits”… if it can be called that as it is shown before the names of the cast. And by the way, even though in the end Ray did achieve his objective into remaking Hancock, I doubt a real life Ray would have any luck in remaking the image of certain Community |
I watched “Wanted” two or three weeks ago, also at GV Marina with an old friend who didn’t have much time to meet up with friends ever since he has gotten married. The story revolves around Wesley Gibson (James McAvoy), the rare mega-loser you probably won’t find among your acquaintance or in your office. Wesley’s life begin to change when he met Fox (Angelina Jolie), who inducted him into a Fraternity of assassins with special powers run by Sloan (Morgan Freeman). Wesley was told of his real ‘identity’ and was subjected to a series of devilish training to succeed the position of and to avenge his father he never knew. As you have seen in the trailers, Wesley would ultimately learn the special skill – curve the bullet (sort of like Obi-Wan and Yoda training Luke Skywalker in the Force kinda stuff). He would then go on to meet his destiny – getting the mission to kill his father’s killer – Cross (Thomas Kretschmann), a former member of the Fraternity. What do I think of the movie? Well, grossly over-hyped and too much blasted computer graphics! The only redeeming quality of the show, as I jokingly told chaosdingo some time back, is the view of Angelina Jolie’s back and butt crack as she comes out the bath (though I think the freaking tattoo sucks but I am not Brad Pitt so what the heck.). Anyway, Morgan Freeman and Angelina Jolie more than make up in acting what is lacking in substance and it is not too often I see Morgan Freeman in the kind of role he plays in this movie. |
![]() |
On a scale of 1 – 5, I’ll give 3.5 for entertainment, 3.5 for storyline and 3 for ending. While there is an unexpected twist almost near the end of the movie, it wasn’t so much of a shock or a novelty. If you won’t consider it spoilers, I would like to say I considered it a tribute to Star Wars. On thinking back, if there is anything to learn from this movie, it would be not to be too trusting to what is apparent or circumstantial and unverifiable. You won’t know when you might end up getting stabbed in the back or being used to further another person’s agenda. Anyway, when one considers that tragic ending (watch it to find out!), it is certainly wiser for one to leave and to stand on one’s own principles, even if that means facing and fighting the very Fraternity he once believed in and is a part of. |
Ban of Brothers
I saw this funny banner on dk’s blog today, and found it to be quite funny. I’ll repost it to share some ‘joy’.
圆满结束… 真的吗?
[ping.sg] Will nocturne be banned?
I was out drinking last night at Brewerks when I received an sms telling me that nocturne has written several posts criticizing Daphne. It was even more amusing that when I accidentally clicked on the favorite (since removed) in my browser, I saw that these posts have gotten into Top 10:

Apparently, nocturne has re-posted his old post on Daphne, and posted an “apology” as well. In either case, nocturne spoke the things about Daphne that probably many people – with the exception of bloggers xueyu82 and a_x – wanted to say but didn’t have the moral courage to do so.
Now the question is, will nocturne enter ping.sg’s Hall of Dishonor – otherwise known as the ‘Ban of Brothers’ for daring to ‘swat the fly on the head of the tiger’ [老虎头上拍苍蝇]? Whatever the end result is, it no longer matters. If nocturne is banned, it simply reinforces what some of us already believed / known as a fact – that the management of ping.sg tolerates no criticisms. If nocturne is not banned, then well, what’s so different in nocturne’s case from that of dk? It begs the question why this is treated as yet another private dispute among bloggers even when certain comments appears to be even more divisive and harmful than dk’s post. I quote:
Let me remind you of the difference between DK and me – I don’t give a shit about your precious ‘community’.
Now, if anyone would allow me, the main justification for dk’s banishment from the Garden of “Pingden” was that he committed the ‘cardinal sin’ of saying he has given up on the community after he had simply pointed out that the thoughtless comments Daphne made can be viewed as divisive.
If the well being of the community is of paramount importance, then is ‘not giving a shit about the community’ not a even more ‘heinous crime’? Why the disparity in treatment for both cases? Why the double standards? It begs the question why dk was made an example of, simply for speaking up at the clearly obvious divisive actions – intentional or not – of Daphne?
Is nocturne going to be spared just because he only blogged and ping his posts and never comment on the forum? Or that he is not really known in real life to most users on ping.sg? Really, when dk was banned, I had actually found it ridiculous that dk gets a denial of service simply because he has ‘given up on the community’ . Frankly, when was ‘community participation’ and ‘concern for the community’ ever a requirement for using ping.sg’s services? Perhaps Uzyn should just ban the rest of the non-active members which just ping their posts for traffic and never participate at all in the community because they did with action what nocturne did with words – I don’t give a shit about your precious ‘community’. And that’s not mentioning all those members without a blog listed in or have their blogs removed from their registered accounts.
Anyway, I will be watching closely the fate of nocturne in this episode because just several days ago, nocturne made history by being the first to have 7 posts (at least when I made the screen capture below) in the Top 10.

And that truly amuses me is because 2 days before that happened, I had a discussion with another blogger about the ‘dk-effect’ (i.e. that posts from dk will always be ponged into the Top 10), and that Uzyn (whom we assumed to be this extraordinary evil genius) has made use of this opportunity to remove dk from ping.sg so some sanity will return to the Top 10.
Apparently, we didn’t consider that other bloggers will move to fill that position and the ‘dk-effect’ will always be permanent feature in ping.sg until the Top 10 is completely removed. We are simply too naive and we have definitely over-estimated in some parts when we had our discussion.