Kids Getting Hurt…

30 stitches for girl who ran into wall at food court

I REFER to the article, ‘Girl gets fracture, gash from water-slide ride’ (ST, Nov 23), and the recent reports on young children getting injured by escalators.

I thank The Straits Times for informing the public about all these incidents so that parents can be forewarned about the potential danger at these places and avoid them.

I cannot help but notice that there is a sudden surge in accidents involving young children.

Perhaps establishments are getting more lax and do not consider safety issues involving children. Hence they fail to notice potential danger zones and structures that could cause serious injuries to children, even though they do not pose any danger to grown-ups as adults with their mature spatial awareness and motor skills can avoid these hazards easily.

My daughter also met with a nasty accident recently.

My family, together with three other families with children were at the Biopolis Food Court for dinner. When we were about to leave, my daughter, while running towards us, ran into the edge of a wooden wall and the sharp 90-degree corner cut open her forehead, exposing the bone beneath.

She bled profusely from the vertical 5cm-long gash so we rushed her to the National University Hospital’s A&E department where she was admitted and underwent surgery.

She received more than 30 stitches. Thankfully, she did not suffer any fracture of the skull as we had initially feared – the attending doctor had said this was possible as the cut was very deep.

While the wooden wall may add aesthetic value, was it structurally necessary? Even if it is, do the corner edges have to be so sharp?

JTC, the owner of the premises, and Foodbank Pte Ltd, the operator, have certainly failed to ensure that the design of the premises is safe for families with children.

I share this in the hope that all parents could be forewarned about the danger spot at Biopolis Food Court should they dine there someday.

Alinna Chan Lai Kuen (Ms)

I also cannot help but noticed that there is a sudden surge in accidents involving young children and I have had quite a bit of a hard time figuring out why because I am not a parent. However, I do believe that the real problem doesn’t lie with the kids or the location, but with the parents themselves.

I remembered clearly my friend Peter wrote this on MSN chat when we talked about the incident in which a kid lost a toe at the escalator, “My son will never go near the escalator.” And the reason is obvious. Peter disciplines his son whenever he does something dangerous or outrageous, for e.g. running around in a food court, playing near the escalator, putting stuff other than food and tidbits into the mouth, or when the boy is rude to elders like the granny.

Contrast that to just another parent – whom I do not know – at the Food Junction food court at Raffles City the other day when I met my friend Jimmy for dinner. While his wife is away to get some food, his two kids were running around a walkway where people carrying their food – some of it hot soup – will be walking about. All this father did was repeatedly telling the kids to sit down and yet took absolutely no physical action. And needless to say, the two little brats couldn’t care less nor heed any of his verbal warnings while Jimmy and I looked on helplessly.

I won’t be surprised if some careless soul runs into his kids and spill hot soup onto his kids, the parent would be quick to find fault with that luckless person, and accuse him of being reckless and careless, while forgetting that it is his own responsibilities to keep his own children safe! And all the more such incidents reinforced my opinion that a lot of Singaporean couples are completely incapable of parenting, and at the same time I am glad birth rate is low to spare the planet of more little brats!

On sharing this with another friend Justin on MSN, we both agreed that our parents would have stood up, caught hold of us and forcefully lead us back to our seats when we were kids. If we even dare to throw tantrums, a spanking would definitely be in order right away, or when we get home.

So when I read this letter, I wondered why her child was running towards her. Just how on earth did she let her go so far from her side? I am not surprised if I hear comments like: “You won’t understand until you become a parent.”

And yes, I won’t understand until I become a parent, but I definitely did understand NOW why my parents always warned me – when I was a kid – not to run around because of the danger of hurting myself even when there isn’t even the remotest possibility of me coming to any bodily harm. I also understand NOW why my parents would give me a spanking when I failed to heed their warning.

Guess what? Blessed with responsible parents, I got through my childhood without much injuries and in pretty good health. None of my friends who are properly disciplined as a child end up as an undesirable element – read: criminal – of this society. And when I look at Peter’s boy, I am quite sure he would be a lot more well behaved than a lot of those screeching, whining little brats that I run into more often than not.

And before all you wimpy liberal parents start condemning me, please, I don’t advocate treating your children with excessive violence. But I do believe a little discipline is at times necessary to protect these kids from harm, if not to maintain some kind of social order and keep other adults from being annoyed or disturbed by little screeching monsters. Save your much ‘enlightened’ ideas of ‘reform and reasoning’ for older kids. It’s high time you stop believing that your kid would be some kind of genius who would mature and behave like a responsible adult at 3 years old!!

Yet Another Unpublished Letter…

I know most of the time my letters end up in the rubbish bin… but I am a sucker for pain and sometimes some of the idiotic letters on the Stooge Times Forum / Today’s Voices or the featured articles on these papers just really make me mad with the idiots who wrote them.

Here’s yet another one that didn’t make it.


I refer to the article ‘Jam-packed trains here? It’s worse in other major cities’, (Straits Times Forum Online Story, Nov 27).

I felt exasperated whenever comparisons with other cities are made with regard to certain feedback, be it about our public transport system, cost of living, sizes and cost of apartments or even the raise in GST!

Is there a double standard whereby ‘complaints’ are to be silenced by comparing with something worse; but when justifying, for e.g. a director’s pay, it is to be compared with someone who earns more?

In other words, such comparisons are meaningless. They do not solve any problems at all. In fact, such comparisons probably drive more people to take to cars as a prime choice of transport in spite of the amount of money spent on our ‘World Class Transport’.

So far, I have seen comparisons with London, Tokyo, New York, Paris and Rome. May I ask, just how objective are comparisons based on interviews or personal experience? Just what good is such comparisons when Tokyo, New York and London are almost 2 times, or more than 2 times as populated as Singapore?

Furthermore, have we also looked at the frequency of trains during peak hours in these cities and the age of these cities’ subway systems? What about the fares in those other countries? And how about train load during off peak hours? Is it just me that I felt very often, trains looked as if they are at peak hours loads, even at 9:30pm at night? How does that compare to other cities at a similar time?

Please, quit comparing with other cities based on personal experience or opinion. It’s hardly a apple to apple comparison.

Singapore’s Only True Natural Resource

A frog in a pot of water whereby the temperature slowly increases was once used to describe the situation Singaporeans are in. The reason being that if you increase the temperature slowly, the frog would not notice the temperature difference and jump out of the water.

It’s a good description but hardly apt. Because ultimately it kills the frog, and well, the Singapore gover-min would not have that, would they? They certainly do not want the frog to die, or jump out of the water [quit]. It would be a waste of the only natural resource this nation has.

Thus, the Singapore gover-min has perfected the art of making a spectacular amount of money out of the people, by spreading out the cost among everyone until the ‘losers’ have no incentive at all to fight back, but simply accept their losses and move on.

Take for example, the incessant fare increases by still profitable transport operators in spite of an obvious lack of improvement in service. It is clear that the transport operators reap huge profits from the hikes, even when it costs the commuters a mere 1 cent per trip.

Will the ‘losers’ – i.e. the commuters – in this case, want to spend more time and possibly money to try and fight the hikes? The answer is obvious.

Next, we look at the postage increases by SingPost. Local postage has gone up from 22 cents to 25 cents. And this will cost a 3 cents increase per letter posted locally.

Will the ‘losers’ – i.e. the people who use the postal service – want to spend more time and / or money to try and fight the hikes? The answer is again, obvious.

Finally, we look at mini$terial pay. Our mini$ter$ are the highest paid in the world and what does it cost each taxpayer? A mere 3 plates of ‘char kway teow’ a day, as it is claimed.

Will the ‘losers’ – i.e. the common citizens – want to risk their necks, and face possible loss of freedom, or run afoul of the law, to stage public protests and fight it? Again, the answer is pretty obvious.

Simply put, the Singapore gover-min perfected the art to make money out of its citizens by presenting them with nothing but a Hobson’s choice. It’s an apparently free choice that is no choice at all. You simply accept it because the other choice is so much more unacceptable. It is a choice between two undesirable options. The obvious choice is the one which wouldn’t kill you, unlike raising the temperature of the pot of water in which the frog is in.

So, a more suitable description for the plight of Singaporeans, is more of that of a rubber tree. Incessant, bit-by-bit increases is more akin to making a shallow groove in the rubber tree to tap its latex. You can continue to come back and make more shallow grooves to tap the rubber tree again and again without killing the tree. Just make sure you don’t tap too deep or it’ll kill the tree.

The best part of all is that a rubber tree doesn’t demand much. All it needs is fertilisers and water. That probably also explains why Singaporeans can take a lot of shit from the gover-min and yet get on with their lives. And if there is no water, the tree can’t blame the plantation workers, because rain is controlled by God, just as we can’t blame the Tali-PAP gover-min for bad economic conditions, because that’s the problem of external factors.

Not only are Singaporeans like rubber trees, they must also be like rubber. They must be flexible and soft so as to take a lot of stress and pressure. A Singaporean worker must be flexible enough to ‘upgrade his skills to stay employable’ and soft enough to take whatever our so-called trade unions and employers dishes out at them.

Thus, I, Darth Grievous, proudly proclaim all of us Rubber Trees, Singapore’s Only True Natural Resource.

Have a nice day, dude.

Last Time…

  • we cry Merdeka say don’t want ang-moh master, now we say ang-moh will make our economy better;
  • we go to school wear Panda shoe, now some students go to school got Prada too;
  • parent no money can be illegal hawker, now parent no money cannot even be hooker
    (The jobs already taken by Thai, Viet, Cambodia and China people);
  • the young girl in Kong Siak Street’s is ‘ang pai’ hooker, now all these aunty can only serve lao uncle;
  • no one say our ancestors are their home country’s quitter now you ‘bway song’ gahmen you kenna label a ‘traitor’ or ‘quitter’;
  • last time sweep the floor all the ‘never study’ people now sweep the floor all Benga-lah ‘talented’ foreigner;
  • we catch longkang fish and spider, now kids play Xbox360, PS3 and computer;
  • we ‘pah gor-lee’ [play marbles], now kids go arcade & lan game centre;
  • people got BATA BM2000 some of the classmates become sore-eye monster, now kids still wear the Nike from one season ago they better don’t go to school this semester;
  • we go test cannot even use simple calculator, now kids no PDA ‘chow chow’ also use scientific calculator;
  • a guy or girl sio hun kee’ [smoking] people say we ‘pai-kia’ [gangster] or hooker, now don’t play play can be a doctor;
  • lifts stop only on certain level only will stop on every level;
  • people ‘kwai kwai’ [goody goody] no throw litter, now got some people do CWO and pay $1000 fine also ‘sup sup water’ [small matter];
  • we army time eat cook house the food look like Frankenstein monster, now NS boy eat SFI and served by aunty like an ocifer;
  • ocifer ask us do star jump we ask ‘How high?’ now soldier tell ocifer ‘You sleep earlier stack your pillow high high.’;
  • ocifer scold us ‘knnbccb’ we ‘Yes, sir’ ‘Yes, sir’ 3 bag full, now ocifer would be a fool to even talk about soldier’s mother;
  • encik / incher like big shot in army now all nice nice like your uncle because scared contract over outside ‘got no lobang’ for good job end up become taxi driver;
  • encik / incher say ‘F*ck your mother’ we better not utter, now soldier say ‘wait for the MP or my father’s lawyer letter’;
  • PTI [Physical Training Instructor] like God got alot of power now all become FS [Fitness Specialist] aka ‘F*ck Spider’;
  • PTI say ‘Run there touch the tree come back’ we cheong like mad, now FS say the same soldier will say ‘You are a seow on muthaf*cker’;
  • last time kenna tekan is wash toilet with toothbrush or guard duty turn out every hour, now kenna tekan in army is clerk kenna arrow to type a letter;
  • MO give you Attend-C maybe also no use now MO no give MC for little little ailment can also kenne charge for abuse;
  • we book out long weekend long long one time chiong ‘Fire Disco’ now every weekend you see army boys at Dbl O;
  • working people say life difficult we accept it because people eat salt more than we eat rice now kids say ‘Get out of my elite uncaring face!’;
  • we got portable radio happy like f*ck now some kids no iPod newest model the parents will kenna f*ck;
  • we get beating from teacher in school we go home kenna round two, now teacher scold student must watch out and better not leave school too;
  • only see father hit son until son concuss now baby son take Ultraman toy hit the father the man also dare not shout;
  • only student got crush on teacher now got teacher send student ‘我爱你’ SMS;
  • we hardly hear of people ‘shot-gun & misfire’, now Nanyang Poly girl porn video circulate on Internet like wild fire;
  • Vietnamese and China people all simple simple now got old man CPF all con by some of their people;
  • we wanna eat 70cents ice cream also think dunno how many days now kids eat at MacDonalds’ everyday; and
  • we ask our daddy ‘Do you love me?’ our daddy think we crazy, now daddy no say ‘I love you’ kids become crazy.

I know this does not rhyme, but next time gover-min ask you make more baby you tell them the above and ask them in Cantonese:

‘问你点敢乱生仔?’

Parking Idiots

Found these parking idiots in a carpark along Aliwal Street on 22 Nov 2006 when I met my friend after work for coffee somewhere near the Sultan Mosque. Wanted to submit them to the Parking Idiots blog but was too lazy to.

When I showed these photos to another friend later, he said these clowns must be rushing off to the Dong Guan (东莞) KTV there to have fun with the China girls and that’s the reason why they can’t be bothered to park properly. After all, when your brain functions have been transferred to your testicles, there just isn’t enough space down there to fit everything the size of your brains.

[Above] These two idiots, SFV1183L and SFB3757Z, are parking in a lorry lot. One of those earth movers should come and park right on top of them.

[Above] SGG1054T deprived 4 motorcyles of their lots. I wondered how many motorcyclists are cursing this guy up to the 18 previous generations.

[Above] This selfish idiot is parking in the carpark alright, but he not in a lot. Not to mention he’s obstructing that narrow bent. He probably suppose he isn’t blocking anyone, but SFA9799T ought to get tail-ended by someone someday to wake up him from being such a inconsiderate prick.

1 149 150 151 152 153 186