Photos – iLights at Marina Bay

Took these photos a few weeks back with my mei xinyun, chillycraps, and her shifu (a super nice guy who is humble and takes criticisms heartily) after work on the weekend. It is obvious that my night photography skills are terrible… a testimony of my terrible photography techniques – demonstrating the obvious that I failed to hold my camera steady while I shoot.

By the way it would have turned out a lot worse if my mei didn’t help me reset the camera to default settings. Otherwise I don’t think I’ll have anything to put up. Thanks for the company, all of you. Or else that weekend would have been another boring one since I cut down on drinking due to ‘hard times’.

Photos – Southern Ridges #2

It was over lunch some months ago a colleague and I decided to take leave one afternoon on a Friday to go take some photos. And off we went with our compacts to the Henderson Wave and Faber Point on Friday 29.10.2010.

These are some of the photos we have taken.

Commentary – Forest Fires and Smoky Skies

Rogue State.

It generally refers to: a state that does not respect other states in its international actions; and a state or nation acting outside of the accepted national or international norms and policies. It is not difficult to perceive Indonesia as such a state. A state that perpetrates a form of ‘eco-terrorism’ for the past 16 years (since 1994 when the region was first engulfed in smoke).

I will not mince words and call it the haze. This is not haze. It is smoke, pure and simple. It is smoke resulting from the deliberately burning of forests. It is smoke that resulted from the deliberate neglect and blatant indifference of the governmenet gahmen in Jakarta. A gahmen that has clearly lost its right to rule its provinces since it has done nothing much for them in return while sucking them dry of resources. For all intentions and purposes, Indonesia is a failed state.


View from my office – 22.10.2010

I do not make these allegations likely. It wasn’t too long ago Aceh was fighting for separation. It would have gone on if not for the tsunami in 2006. The reason is obvious. The Indonesia gahmen has been exploiting Aceh of its resources, while given them very little in return. One can also read about flash floods as a result of deforestation in Irian Jaya (killing at least 150 people), and the mud flow that went on seemingly perpetually in Sidoarjo. It makes one ask – Is the gahmen in Jakarta a gahmen for Indonesia, or just a Javanese gahmen extending its hegemony over the rest of the provinces?

Remember what the region (and in fact the rest of the world) did for them when the tsunami happened? Many of us donated money and the SAF and many charity organisations sent medical personnel. We did whatever we can to help them. Even the United States sent an aircraft carrier to the Indian ocean, staying just outside Indonesian waters (out of respect to the so-called sovereignty of this rogue state) while they airlift aid into Aceh. But what did Indonesia do when we choked in the smoke? Abso-fxxking-lutely N O T H I N G!!!

Except for talking cock (Singlish for saying a load of rubbish). Indonesia’s Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa has said that fighting the haze could not be done by Indonesia alone and stressed that it was a transnational problem, requiring the cooperation from countries in the region.

Read between the lines and this is nothing but blackmail. This is what it really mean:” I ain’t going to do nuts about it until well, you help us – i.e. give us money. And just what can you do about it while you choke in our smoke anyway? Muahahahah!”

It certainly reminds me of what the DDR (East Germany) did when it was failing. It was selling dissidents or those who were arrested for attempting to flee to the FDR (West Germany) for 50,000 Deutsch Marks each. It is really nothing more but political blackmail.

As if that isn’t enough, it has been said that certain Indonesian officials are actually defiant when confronted. They were said to have remarked that (in my words) – ‘Singapore shown no gratitude for the fresh air from Indonesian forests but complains loudly over just a few smoky days’; ‘Singaporean companies are also responsible for hiring locals to clear forest by burning’; and ‘There is no evidence that the smoke is caused by us. We have not seen any increase in hot spots.’ Unfortunately I have not been able to find the articles containing these statements to identify the specific Indonesian officials who made these comments, though I am sure many has read it on our evening Chinese tabloids, and I recalled references to these remarks by friends on social media platforms like Plurk. I wished someone runover them with ‘Optimus Prime’ when visibility is low and tell them: “There is no evidence I actually run over you”.

Eitherway. I have given up on our gahmen. Our gahmen did nothing but protest, and actually even offer to help. What H E L P?! I am not about to pay from our collective pockets unless the cost is charged to that good-for-nothing gahmen in Jakarta. Indonesia can try and posture and say it has done much to combat the problem, but it has yet to ratify the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution adopted since 2002! Says a lot about the honorless curs in Jakarta, doesn’t it? In fact, the very fact that it hasn’t even ratify this, gives us no basis to even sue them in an International court for damages.

It also points to the fact that ASEAN is nothing more than a talk shop. More talk even than NATO, even though we often equate NATO with No Action Talk Only. ASEAN has even turn into nothing more than a forum for Americans to execute its strategies in containing China in the South China Sea. Frankly, if there are many things that are the internal matters of each individual country and ASEAN shouldn’t interfere – such as what the junta in Myanmar did to its people – then territorial disputes between members of ASEAN with China are their own private matters too. Just why the sh*t is ASEAN dancing to the tune of the Americans and coerce China to terms, when it didn’t even have the moral courage and ability to make member gahmens abide by agreements they made?

Random Discourse – Singlish & Proper English

It has been an awfully long while since I last blogged.

Basically this is what happened: lousy people at work (some in certain support teams, some in overseas locations and a particular person in a high management position) created so much unnecessary work that I have no time to really catch up on current events, much less think about them. So inevitably, I get writer’s block.

The writer’s block hasn’t really gone away but I have at least found a little on one of the current events to write about: Singlish & Proper English

First of all, I have always felt that the Speak Good English campaign is an over reaction to the complaints of a few tourists who couldn’t understand a sales staff who simply didn’t have the common sense to use proper English. I felt that the English language nazis would be primarily the ‘bourgeois bloatpigs’ (or DCMC aka decadent Chinese middle class as a friend called them) – the self-proclaimed artsy fartsy ‘elites’ – that is pushing for it because they can’t gel with the general populace. Especially the group of English-speaking Chinese who can’t identify with being Chinese and can’t speak Mandarin for nuts. They looked down on Singlish, and thus pushed for speaking proper English because that would make them feel better or more superior than the rest of us.

On the other hand, my friend of many years mentioned that it might not be entirely true. Parents who can’t speak proper English (Singlish users themselves) may be those who are more staunch in pushing for their children to be taught in proper English. As we often see our own flaws clearly, we then to over react when we become parents. As parents, most would hope (and expect) that the mistake they have made in life should be prevented for their own children. He has a good point because it reminds me of a scene in the movie ‘Singapore Dreaming’ where the character played by Yeo Yen Yen said, “I would not want mother to babysit my kids. I would hire a maid so he can learn English. Not Hokkien.”

Whatever the reasons are for pushing for the use of proper English, I have no objection. It wouldn’t do well for our national image if we can’t even answer queries in proper English sentences. However, I simply felt Singlish shouldn’t be use as a convenient whipping boy to drive the point even though Singlish provide many examples of bad English. Even so, it is still far better than the ‘shorthand’ use by the teens in forums, instant messaging or SMS. Very often these ‘shorthand’ is completely unintelligible to the uninitiated.

The reason I say that Singlish isn’t the worst example of bad English is that in a broader sense, Singlish permeates through even our spoken Mandarin and Chinese dialects. It is a Singaporean language where we took words and ideas from another race and use them. For e.g., we use terms like ‘tio sahman’, ‘bway tahan’ and ‘bo bahkay’ in Hokkien, ‘kum mi sin’ in Cantonese and ‘geh dor loey’ / ‘gu lui’ in Cantonese and Hokkien respectively and we can tell from the origins of these words that they were taken from English and Malay respectively.

So, if the language nazis really wants to root out Singlish, then they shouldn’t stop with English. River Valley Road should be renamed 河谷路 in Chinese, instead of calling it 里巴巴利路. That’s not mentioning that some roads like Temple Street (登婆街) should also be renamed. Singlish lingo has so permeated into our spoken Mandarin, that a Chinese speaker from a different part of the world has difficulty understanding us. In fact, even when I was in Taiwan and Hong Kong, the locals there at times have trouble understanding what I am saying in Hokkien or Cantonese. Should the ‘Hoey Kuans’ (Chinese dialect associations) should also conduct lessons and purge all traces of foreign influences in the dialects? While all of these can be done, the question is – is it necessary and is it even beneficial to us as Singaporeans?

Let’s not forget that the English language itself is a mix-match of languages. Over thousands of years, the languages of the original inhabitants of the British Isles, and foreign arrivals like the Germanic Anglo-Saxons, plus the various Norse tribes contributed to the English we know today. Look through the English dictionary and many will find traces of root words coming from French, German and Latin. If I recalled correctly, at the Dead Sea Scrolls exhibition I was once told that modern English is basically the construct of William Tyndale when he translated the Bible into English. As such, I have always found the idea that Singlish being bad English is rather myopic. As people from different cultures mingle, they will inevitably be cultural exchanges where ideas, culture and words (along with some bodily fluids and genetic material) are absorb by one another. If Singapore is a cultural desert then Singlish is one of the cactus that grows in it. It is one of the things that we as a people have created together spontaneously without consciously realising it.

Anyway, it has always been my considered opinion we really need to be aware of the context and condition before we choose to speak in Singlish. When it is clear the person is new to Singapore (such a tourist), then we should make the effort to speak in standard English. When we are calling or writing to a foreigner in an overseas branch of the company, we should also make the effort to speak in proper English since someone in the foreign office may themselves be also struggling to speak proper English and it is made worse if our own English capabilities are also deplorable.

As for foreigners who wants to settle down here, those who actually dared complain about Singlish should not even consider settling down in Singapore! After all, if I go to Switzerland I am expected to learn one of the three main languages there – either German, Italian or French. Foreigners who wants to settle down here should thus learn our lingo and speak it like one of us – a true sign of their integration into our society! Frankly, I have enough of mainlanders or foreigners from the sub-continent settling here but made no effort at all to integrate. They keep to themselves and speak their own languages. It is most irritating when I stepped into the lift or the MRT, I felt like an alien in my own country!

Now for the uninitiated who wondered what are some of the ‘Singlish’ terms I mentioned earlier:

  • ‘sahman’ (or ‘sum-man’, depending on how you pronounce it): a mutation of the English word ‘summon’. ‘Tio sahman’ simply refers to being issued a fine – most often a traffic fine or a parking ticekt.
  • ‘tahan’: a Malay word and we have generally use it to mean block, hold and support – for e.g. you tahan here first while go for a break.
  • ‘boh bahkay’: a mutation of the Malay words ‘tak pakai’, which generally means ‘not recognised’ or ‘not accepted’ – for e.g. This $50 note is a counterfeit. Boh bahkay one.
  • ‘Loey’ or ‘lui’ (in Cantonese and Hokkien respectively): a mutation of the Malay word ‘duit’, which means money.
  • ‘kam mi sin’: a local Cantonese mutation of the English word ‘commission’.

Recommended Reads:
Userfail: Keyboard
Userfail: Mouse

Current Affairs – Low Thia Khiang vs. Eric Low

It amuses me to no end when the TaliPAP shoots itself in the foot – such as the recent exchange between Hougang Member of Parliament Mr Low Thia Khiang (Workers’ Party) and Eric Low of the TaliPAP.

We now know the uphill task the opposition parties faced to reach the electorate. We now also know that certain positions of the elected MP are supplanted by the loser Tali-PAP candidate (or his successor), and some of the elected MP’s functions and roles in his ward are usurped by the same loser Tali-PAP candidate even when he has not been elected. It makes a mockery of the electoral process by disregarding the choice of the people. How is that even constitutional?

Mr Low Thia Kiang’s press release on the Workers’ Party website further exposes the fact that in Hougang at least, the People’s Association [PA], Community Club [CC] and grassroots organisations like the Resident Committees [RC] (which should be apolitical) appeared to serve as fronts for the ruling party to obstruct opposition parties. While I used to laugh off my father’s comments that members of the RC are nothing more than lackeys of the ruling party, it would now appear that there is some truth in the words my father said in his drunken stupor. In fact, there is now a deeper meaning when it was mentioned that foreigners should show their ‘willingness to integrate into society’ by participating in grassroots activities such as those of the RC. Perhaps that participation would have been a clear sign of their ‘loyalty’. A loyalty which I felt is not to the nation, but to the ruling party where the election results will thus vindicate its policies to let these people in.

The press release further exposes the fabricated perception that opposition parties only shows up near or during the elections, though I have know for a long time that the Workers’ Party has remained committed in Aljunied GRC. To be exact, one of their Youth Wing members personally invited me several times to some of their activities just to see for myself the work they are doing in between elections after I made the comment that opposition candidates who lost are only active during the election. Even the National Solidarity Party [NSP] understood the negative image of being perceived as an ‘election party’, and has resort to social media platforms (such as a Facebook page) to increase exposure and to make known their continual efforts in between elections.

This is the 2nd time in slightly more than 3 months that the Tali-PAP has shot itself in the foot. In early June, the government gahmen released the Town Council Management Report [TCMR]. It was of no surprise that the two GRCs headed by the Singapore’s ‘Holy Father and Son’ both respectively got top marks in management. It is ironical that two flash floods followed after the report in Orchard (which I believe lies in the Tanjong Pagar GRC) and parts of Thomson Road (which probably lies in Ang Mo Kio GRC) not long after. It almost seem like even God found the TCMR to be a load of crap and made a point Himself, if not for the fact that the drains and public roads aren’t the responsibility of the town councils. Anyway I’ve taken the news of that report with not just a pinch of salt, but with a whole bucket of it. After all, statistics are nothing but numbers and they can be interpreted in anyway favorable to the person giving the interpretation.

Statistical reports hardly mention the facts on the ground such as the satisfaction of residents into account, as stated in the article here. While this is just one blog post, let’s also take into consideration the hard fact that Potong Pasir town council headed by Chiam See Tong has built a walkway linking the MRT station to the housing estate all from its own funds and Hougang MP Low Thia Khiang used $500,000 of his town council’s funds to upgrade the lifts in several blocks on Hougang Avenue 3 and 7. Can you imagine that unlike the Tali-PAP wards, all of these funds comes from the proper management of the collective funds collected by the opposition parties from the residents of the constituency while the gahmen has contribute absolutely nothing to it? Don’t forget that the TCMR itself pointed out that the opposition wards had the most Service & Conservancy [S&C] arrears and the Tali-PAP had shamelessly called that an attempt to score political points by staying in the good books of voters. Even if that is true, I would give the opposition party points for this because I would have pulled my hair out trying balance my accounts just to score political points while getting the money to upgrade the lifts of flats under my charge or to build a walkway. It begs the question whether the Tali-PAP town councils with the least S&C arrears had simply been utterly ruthless in collecting them as well.

Meantime, the blocks which lifts were upgraded in Hougang were demolished seven years later, as if to erase the embarrassing evidence off the face of the Earth. A mess resulting from vandalised solar-powered lamps along a pathway in Potong Pasir left behind by Mr Sitoh Ho Pin was placed squarely on the shoulders of Mr Chiam’s Town Council. Yet both town councils took everything in their stride in spite of whatever stacked against them. If anyone want to consider me biased in my rejection of the TCMR, I would similarly consider that person biased since he hasn’t consider the above facts, much less interview the residents of Potong Pasir and Hougang.

Frankly, just how can one really accept TCMR in light of the fact that some Tali-PAP lost monies in their investments of sinking funds into Lehman-linked or similar investments? While in another other country, the media would have ‘done an Erin Brokovich’ by doing some investigations when these losses came to light, Singapore’s usually docile and utterly useless media has sat on their palms and done absolutely nothing. Meanwhile, it has all the time to infringe on the privacy of former ExCo members involved in the coup to capture the AWARE leadership lea-duhship – shamelessly informing us of these private citizens’s occupation and position in the company where they worked, the kids they have and who they are married to on the country’s national daily – while showing us nothing about the very person who exposed them!

I am not suggesting that the media create tension, outrage and an uproar among Singaporeans with follow up reporting. After all, it could have done exactly the opposite to quell the anger some people would have felt when shown just how little disrepair there is in the towns run by money losing town councils, or how long there haven’t been an increase in S&C charges in these town. In fact, had it been revealed that how some of those investment gains have always been used to cover S&C arrears of residents, it would even have scored a political point. At the very least, such investigative journalism would have kept certain certain politicians humble, and kept them from comments such as ‘residents should thank the Town Council for working hard to come up with a diversified portfolio to generate income so that residents do not have to fork out more money’ after losing a good S$8-million in sinking funds.

These two incidents showed that the alleged talent of Tali-PAP candidates is nothing more but a fallacy, a figment of imagination in the minds of the self-proclaimed elites of the Tali-PAP. They are certainly not infallible, and in spite of such sub-standard performance, some of them needs to be enticed with high pay to enter politics. It is not only what they have done we should take note of, but also what they failed to do, and what they failed in doing without being accountable. I certainly hope the electorate will remember all of it at the ballot box!

1 29 30 31 32 33 186