Random Discourse – NSF Deaths and Online Comments

When 21-year old Private Dominique Sarron Lee Rui Feng of 3 Singapore Infantry Regiment [SIR] passed away during training, a girl Zheng Huiting posted the comment “Singaporeans too weak? LOL” to a Facebook link about the news of this tragedy.

This is not a post written to flame Zheng Huiting, because many others have done that rather effectively. The girl has apologised and even beat a hasty retreat from social media by erasing her Facebook and Twitter profiles. My friends and I wouldn’t care to flame her, because we wouldn’t give a damn to the comments about National Service [NS] by those who are not required to do it and has never done it. Personally, I felt some of these girls probably can’t survive even one Physical Traiing [PT] session in the army. If they have so much to say, just try one of our PT sessions. Survive that first, then come back and talk.

However, I am still outraged. We don’t “LOL” (Laugh out Loud) over the death of someone. Regardless whether we know some of these people personally, these are one of our brothers who lost their lives doing their duty for our country.

I remembered watching with some apprehension when another NSF was carried into the medical center on a stretcher screaming in pain. One of his leg is broken and he was bleeding profusely. A part of the shin bone was jutting out. We don’t “LOL” about something like that. We simply rush out of the way so the medics and his platoon mates can carry him quickly into the first aid room. I also remembered back in 1994, I did a recovery for a overturned tank in which the commander was killed. I was subsequently sent as part of the unit (also as part of the larger Armoured Formation) to the poor sod’s funeral. No one wants to die doing their NS. But it breaks the heart when you see the mother screaming and running after the carriage carrying the coffin of her son to the crematorium. None of us even dared to smile, much less “LOL” at that.

Even after our full time NS is completed, some of us still feel something for the units or camps we have served in. When a Taiwanese F-5F crashed in Hukou camp in Taiwan, I went to look up the news to find more details. I was sad when I read that 2 of our soldiers were killed in that crash. No, we don’t “LOL” at such things even when we don’t know those people.

Are our young boys spending 2 years of the prime of their lives defending those who no longer appreciate it? Maybe it’s high time we implement some form of NS for our womenfolk, to bring about some real gender equality. Even putting them as nurses in hospitals would help. Having them pull night or weekend duties will make them understand how painful that is.

If there is any other thing that invalidates the meaning of NS, it would be our young womenfolk’s failure to appreciate the sacrifice our men has to make, on top of employers’ preference in hiring foreigners over Singaporeans due to our NS obligations. I shudder to imagine when they become mothers. Anyway, 2 years of NS is not all to a Singaporean men’s NS obligations. There is also a “reservist” cycle in which the men are expected to spend up to 40 days a year during training, and to keep fit and pass their annual Individual Physical Proficiency Test [IPPT] every year until their are released by the Singapore Armed Forces [SAF]. How long this cycle will be depends on how soon you reach 40 years old or complete 6 High Key and 4 Low Key training, whichever is sooner. If the NSman is an officer, he needs to serve even after 40 years old.

Are we ourselves to blame for this lack of respect for NS? All too often we talk about NS as a waste of time, and we ridicule some of the “silly things” we do during NS before our women folk. Worst of it all are those who thought little of their NS training and openly belittle it. Perhaps I was mistaken. Maybe this chap loved NS so much that he is angry that the Ministry of Defense [MINDEF] did not post him to a unit where training is tougher than what he experienced – such as the Commandoes, the Guards or even the Combat Engineers where they do more than taking a “stroll in Lim Chu Kang or Mandai with guns”. MINDEF should have made him redo his NS.

Then there’s the damage one of our full-time National Servicemen [NSF] has done to the image of NS. We have all done our part to ridicule that poor boy whose maid carried his fullpack, but what is worse is the public hounding of our NSFs – such as a recent photo showing a NSF sitting on the floor of our MRT trains, or even longer ago NSFs who occupied the ‘Priority Seat’ (if I remembered correctly). I have two things to say about this. First of all, why the hell does anyone complain about the NSF sitting on the floor of the MRT when we know just how horrendous the service has been recently? Are we forgetting that the trains come at irregular frequencies, and the increased number of break downs? Furthermore, the train wasn’t even packed and is this poor sod still sitting down where he is when the train is getting more packed? If he stood up when it is required, why berate him for it? Who knows what he might have gone through that day? As for those who took the priority seat, I always find it ridiculous that people takes photos of the “offenders” and make a fuss. Why didn’t they step forward and confront the “offender” right there and then? As far as I am concerned, anyone who failed to do so at the scene has basically forfeited his right to pursue the matter. Don’t convene a ‘kangaroo court’ in STOMP or some forum or website to trial the poor sod.

Really, even though the food, treatment and allowances maybe better in NS these day, I am quite sure the PT sessions to ensure everyone attain the IPPT standards are not compromised. Stop beating up on our NSFs because they seem to be better off now. We all aspire to a better life and we expect the SAF to improve and evolve over time as well. I don’t demand everyone to mourn about accidents and deaths in the SAF, but please remember this is a life of someone who is obliged by law to defend everyone else of us. At the very least honor them for their sacrifices even if they might be just pushing pens in a cubicle in one of our camps.


Recommended Reads:
FoxTwo: Singaporeans Too Weak? LOL!
Senang Diri: Singaporeans close ranks against post on NSF’s death

Sex and the Internet

I installed the ‘WordPress.com stats’ plugin for WordPress recently. While going through the statistics, I noticed that several old posts continue to receive a number of hits regularly. For e.g. the posts on Nanyang Poly Sex Video and Old Singapore Photos continue to receive 10 – 20% of hits the blog gets daily, and these posts are almost 3 years old.

Even before I installed the plugin, I noticed on other trackers that these two posts are the all time popular. In fact two others have also been very popular of late, one of them being Edision Chen’s ‘Photo Gate’ Scandal and the other a post about certain parameters used in the Chinese search engine Baidu [百度] titled: 小龍女的 “女乃 豆頁”

What really interest me is that 3 out of 4 of these popular posts are sex-related or scandalous and it suddenly reminded me of this blog post lamenting the state of Singapore’s blogosphere which I read recently.

I do not agree with the blogger that there is something wrong with Singapore’s blogosphere. In fact, I don’t even think that the popularity of sex-related postings is a Singapore-specific phenomenon. After all, the ‘unexpected search parameters’ on Baidu which I wrote about, would indicate searches performed primarily by people in China using the Baidu search engine, followed by people who are literate in Chinese outside China. On top of which, the most popular website in Singapore may perhaps be sammyboy.com, not to mention that a lot of spam mails are usually sex-related, from women offering to undress on webcams, to drugs improving sexual abilities and increasing the size of your sex organ. It is almost certainly true that ‘The Internet is for pR0n’, a far cry from what its inventors in DARPA have envisioned.

The blogger is not accepting reality when he lament about the state of Singapore’s blogosphere with regard to the Top 10 Most Popular postings [in the last 24 hours] on ping.sg. He should acknowledge the fact that it is simply what the Internet is really about – a place where you can find such objectionable content [to some] easily and readily. Furthermore, he should accept that everyone has this peeping tom tendency [偷窥倾向], i.e. to peep into the privacy of others, and thus there is always this unexplainable excitement and interest in scandalous articles and news – especially those of celebrities. To provide such content would only be meeting the expectation and satisfying the desires of many users.

In short, while it might not be intentional, ping.sg has apparently stumbled upon a ‘gold mine’ simply by its un-moderated nature and allowing sex-related content posts to be published. Personally, I suspected that ping.sg might actually now have an increase in readership compared to the time when there was a thriving pseudo-community.

After all, while the existence of a community may bring a constant return traffic, the effect would be very much like bears catching salmons returning to the breeding ground. On the other hand, having readers of such outrageous, loud, sex-related post would be the equivalent of trawling – readers get snared regardless they liked the service provider or not. In short, it is a much, much more efficient way in ‘strip mining’ readership for income. Even though I have once proposed the complete removal of the Top 10 as the best solution to end the rampage of all objectionable content (when I was a user of ping.sg), I now believe by doing so would truly kill a portion of ping.sg’s traffic as it no longer satisfies the instant gratification for sex-related content that many readers (not necessarily of ping.sg) seek.

On hindsight, I am reminded that some participants in the ping.sg shoutbox have said all along that the attempt to curb or control these postings is not reflecting the true readership at all. After leaving for more than 6 months and looking in from outside, I must admit that they are indeed right about the this matter. Technically, ping.sg is a microcosm of the Internet and therefore the popularity of these postings merely a shadow of the general usage pattern of the Internet itself.

The Internet is for pR0n, indeed!


Disclaimer: I did not mean this post as an offense to anyone in particular or to any site. I do not want any more quarrels. Read it in the context of my response to this post.


Comics:


Recommended Read:
WiseCurve: Singaporean Blogsphere has hope