Photos- Rallies on 5th May 2011

Not much I can write on this post since I ain’t clear what’s restricted on cooling day. Just enjoy the pictures from the two rallies I was in on 5th May, 2011. Personally, I won’t be watching / listening to news on local TV / radio and I won’t be buying any newspapers either.

But on the 7th of May, I will vote with fear. Fear, that if I don’t vote wisely in this election, our votes will be so diluted by new citizens in 2016 that our voices will never be heard. Fear, that it will never be our Singapore again. Fear, that we will be the new aborigines in our land of birth.

I will vote with that fear. I will vote to try and take my country back.

~ * ~

Singapore Democratic Party Boat Quay Rally – 5th May, 2011

Reform Party Clementi Stadium Rally – 5th May, 2011


Recommended Reads:
Alice Cheong Concrete Plan Requires Parliamentary Majority
Krisandro: Hey Singapore, I Am Sorry Too…

Reform Party “Gala and Movie Night”

Rachel invited me to this event several weeks ago. It is a film screening organised by the Women’s Wing of the Reform Party.

Since I generally have nothing much to do on weekends I decided to go to the event, which was at the Sinema Old School (at Mount Sophia) on 27 November 2010. Because it’s a long way in, and we have never been there in the past, we met up for coffee at Raffles City first before taking a cab in.

We arrived around 6:10pm and after identifying that we have brought the tickets for the event, we were given a goodie bag which also comes with the party’s first issue of ‘New Dawn’ and a small sticker for identification. Since I don’t know much of the people there, I generally kept to myself while Rachel pointed out to me some of the people well known on local blogosphere, such as an editor of The Online Citizen, and the author of Yawning Bread. Some other well known personalities who are present include the Reform Party’s (RP) Secretary Kenneth Jeyaretnam, along with Leong Tze Hian and British author Alan Shadrake, who is currently charged for ‘criminal defamation’. I joked with Rachel that one of the guy who stood apart all by himself may probably be an ISD agent though it is really unlikely an ISD agent would be so easily spotted.

We ate a little of the buffet and generally stayed in the air-conditioned shop until it was our turn to be seated for the movie – “Match made” by Mirabelle Ang.

The movie is actually a documentary about a 39-year-old Singaporean guy called Ricky who went to Vietnam to get a bride. Some parts were quite funny, especially when the girls are paraded before Ricky, very much like mamasans parade their girls to their customers in night clubs. Ricky will then ‘short list’ one or a few girls from each selection and I had to respect the girl’s courage and determination to look for a better life elsewhere even though I felt it was a little demeaning for those Vietnamese ladies. Many of these girls are almost 2 decades younger and the guy was always checking whether their year of birth, rejecting some when their Chinese zodiacs are not compatible.

From the ‘short listed’ ones, a translator will translate the questions from Ricky and the answers from the girls. The questions generally surround whether they are willing to live with the potential groom’s parents or why they wanted to marry out of Vietnam. In the end only two were selected and they were then taken to a clinic for a checkup the next day, ostensibly for diseases and whether they have been working girls. In my opinion, the main objective is a virginity check. When the matter was brought up, the Singaporean matchmaker (a Taiwanese married to a Vietnamese woman) vehemently denied being sexists and pointing out he is a father of three daughters.

Either way, once the final girl was selected, the movie went on to show the customary ceremony the couple has to go through in Vietnam. After the wedding dinner, Ricky returned to Singapore alone and the team then took us to the home and family of the bride called Nhanh. It also talked about how the girls are introduced to the matchmakers, and how much money her family gets (a measly US$350 – roughly 5,000,000 đồng, if I recalled correctly) from the matchmaker. As the bride cannot immediately join her husband in Singapore, it talked about how long it will take to apply the visas for the bride.

It will be at least 5 months before Nhanh arrives in Singapore, and the movie then ended abruptly. I will not reveal the ending so everyone can go watch it for themselves.

After the movie, there was a short speech by Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam, an introduction to some of the members of the Women’s Wing, the Reform Party followed by a impromptu speech given by Hazel Poa – the RP’s first lady candidate for this coming election. I would say by the qualifications of these candidates – all of which are professionals with high academic qualifications, the Tali-PAP can no longer denigrate the opposition parties for failing to field talents. Anyway, I have never given much weight to a person’s qualifications as a party’s candidate as I am in the considered opinion that having good qualifications would simply show a person is well trained in a particular field, not necessarily a definitive measure of a person’s talents or intelligence. The seemingly close association of some of RP’s members with Dana Lam, the current president of AWARE where one male member mentioned that he was part the legal advisors which put Dana Lam and her team into place caused me some unease. A brief thought crossed my mind when I recalled that the author of Yawning Bread, who is known to be openly pro-homosexual, is also at the event. (I will touch on that thought later.)

This was followed by an auction which brought much joy and laughter to those present. I won’t touch too much on the auctions themselves other than to mention that it is very similar to people bidding to have dinner with Warren Buffet. In these case, members of the Reform Party will provide either a free dental service, legal counselling, etc for the highest bidder. All of the proceeds from the auctions will go into the RP’s funds for the coming election campaign.

Rachel and I checked the merchandise briefly once the auction is done but we made our way off soon after.

~ * ~

Now back to the matter of my brief thought. The entire hullabaloo surrounding the so-called AWARE ‘coup’ in 2009 and the subsequent counter-coup left me with a bitter aftertaste. While all consider it as religious fundamentalists attempting to subvert a secular organisation, few would remember the so-called ‘coup’ also revealed undesirable sex education content which were slipped into some of our schools by that organisation.

With that in mind, the thought of AWARE subverting the RP through members of its Women’s Wing which has swelled in numbers briefly crossed my mind after the names Dana Lam and AWARE were mentioned more than once. While I vehemently object to the Tali-PAP’s immigration and housing policies in specific (and somewhat agree with Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam’s views on those matters in the first issue of ‘New Dawn’), I will feel uncomfortable casting my vote for anyone who seems to be closely associated with AWARE.

I asked myself, does the RP have other agendas other than those already made public? Would the RP pick up where Siew Kum Hong has left off? As far as I am concerned, an NMP making a big fuss over Section 377A was bad enough. An elected MP with the backing of voters gnawing on that again will be even more unappealing.

After all, while the current immigration and housing policies are unpleasant and they entail material hardships, they are not quite as unacceptable as any attempts which will threaten to unravel the fabric of our society. The threat that I maybe party to putting candidates into Parliament, whom I suspect might go against my views of a stable society and also my freedom of faith, will weigh heavily in my voting decision.

Short Takes

I have written something about these comments before:

Lao Lee said voters must be “daft” if they found fault with the government’s gahmen’s housing policies, and cautioned Singaporeans not to cast a protest vote against the ruling party over this.

He also said if National Development Mini$ter Mah Bow Tan Mabok Tongue is unable to defend this policy, ‘he deserves to lose’ at the next general election, he quipped, to laughter from the participants, including a chuckling Mr Mah.

The Tali-PAP is a master in ‘dividing the people’. Previously it was about stayers and quitters, then heart-landers and cosmopolitans. Now the divide is between existing home owners and those aspiring to be home owners.

As a person who has already bought a HDB flat, and has about another 12 years to pay it off, I ain’t complaining too much about the price I paid for mine. After all, I can’t even get a new flat of the same size now even if I could afford the current prices. (Affordable housing is a misnomer when you need to work the entirety of the better part of your life – between 15 ~ 30 years – to pay it off.)

Lao Lee thinks we would be daft if we do not like housing prices to go up. The fact is, even though I may not like the idea of my own flat losing value, there is no use when I can’t realize the gains I have made on my property because I have to pay for even more for another one. That’s not mentioning the possibility of the future generation not being able to own their own homes. In other words, we would be truly daft if we do not want to see some changes to the current insane housing policy.

My personal opinion is this, if Lao Lee seriously want to see how well Mabok Tongue can defend the current housing policies, he can send Mabok to Hougang SMC and contest against Low Thia Khiang. On top of which, raise the ante and send Grace Fu to contest in Potong Pasir too, or have her contest where Kenneth Jeyaratnam will be contesting in the next election.

The result of these two contests will certainly be a good opinion poll on how the policy stands among Singaporeans. If the Tali-PAP is confident that its mini$ter$ can defend their policies well, it will stand the chance to recover the two opposition wards too.

Personally, I think the result would be a foregone conclusion… and I suggest one person reflect upon his remarks and perhaps on one April Fool’s day or a particular Parliament session put on a Daffy Duck costume.

~~~ * ~~~

From the TODAY Freesheet (April 10, 2010)

Despite having to compete against the People’s Action Party’s (PAP) Tali-PAP electoral machine, the Opposition has been unable to work closely with one another. This undermines the Opposition collectively.

Some time ago, someone taught me that the strength of something may also be its weakness. For e.g. Those which is hard will be brittle, and those that has high tensile strength will be soft.

So while the argument that unity is strength may sound reasonable, a unified front by all of Singapore’s opposition parties may be the equivalent of putting them all in the same boat. All it needs is one careless motherfxxker mofo, and the entire boat sinks with them.

Consider this, would it be reasonable for the Workers’ Party or the Singapore People’s Party to defend the position of another opposition party member if he makes a insensitive remarks to certain races or religious groups?

The editor of this article is either too idealistic, or simply politically naive.

~~~ * ~~~

Are hotel hourly rates necessary?
Letter from Soh Ah Yuen TODAY Freesheet (Apr 28, 2010)

I refer to “Will budget hotels review operations?” (April 22) concerning court proceedings against the owner of Shing Hotel at Kitchener Road for renting out hotel rooms by the hour to prostitutes.

Singapore is not Malaysia, which has long highways.

There, motorists sometimes break their journey to make use of hotels enroute, to perhaps have a shower and catch a few hours of sleep before driving on. This is done primarily with safety in mind.

Alarm bells should therefore ring for the relevant authorities when hotels here rent out their rooms by the hour. It does not require much detective work to uncover the illegal side of their operations.

The operators of such hotels should be made to account for why they would want to rent out their rooms in this way.

If this is enforced strictly, it will save the authorities precious time playing a cat-and-mouse game with the operators.

Soh Ah Yuen may believe it is a great idea to eradicate the problem by prohibiting hotels from renting their rooms by the hour, but let’s take a look at how effective the crackdowns have been.

In fact, the fight against smut has gone on for awhile. Let’s go further back and look at how it started with the sleazy pubs and bars and massage parlors at Joo Chiat. While Chan Soo Sen can proudly claim that he has been successful in eliminating the smut from Joo Chiat, it has merely moved on to one section of Geylang. When the problem of Joo Chiat SMC is now the problem of Aljunied GRC, is the problem really solved?

Next, the crackdown on street walkers has probably gone on for almost a year. There is no doubt that the Singapore Police Force has been efficient when one look at the number of arrests made in each operation. But the question is, in spite of the efficiency of the police, was the crackdown at all effective when we now have reports that street walkers spilling over into Jalan Besar (outside the Petain Road & Deskar Road area), People’s Park & China Town, Lavender and even as far as Kovan? These crackdowns are as good as excising a tumor only to find the cancer spreading to other parts of the body. In fact, this is like the Vietnam War where we have a large body count to show, but no significant progress is made in the war.

The crackdown has also driven the pimps to now take their business online to websites and forums. I am almost amazed by the resilience shown here, whoever running these prostitute rings seems to have adopted Mao Zedong’s concept of guerilla warfare and strike where they are least expected.

In view of how the ‘contagion’ evolved in response to law enforcement, does Soh Ah Yuen really think prohibiting hotel hourly rates will serve as an effective measure to put an end to this? Consider the scenario where people rent out rooms in private property, which means the problem now move into the heart of residential areas and not just near them. On top of which, what about people ‘doing a Jack Neo’ – buying cars and installing curtains in them so they can take a woman for a quick romp in car parks?

Are these scenarios more appealing to Soh Ah Yuen?

~~~ * ~~~

A biker buang his bike & die at ECP, made me jam for 45mins + $3 ERP! He’s probably going to hell because of that! – Aaron Ong Shaocheng

I used to rant a lot when I am caught in a jam. I will usually direct my vitriol on the other road users for not keeping to their lanes or failing to maintain a constant speed and slowing down for no reasons at the ERP gantries or speed camera.

However, I’ll keep my mouth shut when someone has lost his life in a traffic accident. There is no need to guess the deceased is a motorcyclist most of the time. The reason being that I have many friends who are motorcyclists, and no one deserved such a death.

Personally, I really wondered, whether the cost of education spent on this Aaron Ong Shaocheng (allegedly an A*Star scholar as well) is wasted. Then again, the idea of education that Confucius have more than 2000 years ago is very different from what we are doing now. Back then, the idea was to ‘educate’ people in manners and rituals, so that everyone will behave in a defined and harmonious way within the society. These days, education just cramp into our heads the hard skills of science – chemistry, mathematics, physics and what not. Abilities in these hard skills become the standard one’s intelligence and education while the soft skills of ‘learning how to be a proper human being and not a beast’ take a backseat.

Morality is a big word that no one dares to talk about and you get beaten with the stick labelled ‘self righteousness’ for simply talking about it. Even school teachers refrain from disciplining students because of parents’ complaints. But when children are not showed why they are disciplined but instead those who attempt to discipline are punished, what is there to expect from these children when they grow up? They have barely understand what is not socially acceptable, because their parents gave them the impression they have done no wrong.

Aaron Ong definitely won’t be the first nor the last of self-centered, compassion lacking beasts. But I’ll do one thing for sure when I find out what’s his car license number. That is, if I ever see his car in one of those minor accident, I will wind down the window and shout at him: “Serves you right! Thank God you and your stinking piece of iron scrap will be off road tomorrow. I am quite sure traffic will be smoother and it’ll save me some money on ERP because of that, you c**bai kia!”

Commentary – JB Jeyaratnam Interview

The link to the video was sent to me via email in Facebook via a Facebook group called “In Memory of B Jeyaretnam”. It was an interview between JB Jeyaratnam and FEER editor Hugo Restall in 2008. The video was never released though it seems to have found its way to Youtube some how.

JBJ touch on several topics: such as why he was ‘singled out to be destroyed’ among all opposition members, his disagreement with some of his former party members while in the Workers’ Party, his opinion regarding that disagreement, and also his opinion on civil disobedience as championed by Dr. Chee Soon Juan. He also touched on the inequality which he felt is brought upon by the ruling party and the system it implemented and why he felt the entire system should go.

There is not much of an opinion I can form from a 7½-minute video though I would only like to point out that even if I agree with him that the current system must be abolished, my question would be what kind of a new system would be implemented in place of it?

Whatever the proposed system maybe, I am all ears as long as they do not intend to take out the current one and then figure out what to do next. Unlike China, which could ‘feel the rocks to cross the river’ [摸着石头过河] after the tumultuous Cultural Revolution, could Singapore afford to mill about and try to find new direction as our rivals will be progressing and waiting for the opportunity to surpass us all the time?

We will never know whether Chiam See Tong or Low Thia Khiang‘s version of a loyal, peaceful opposition would be the better one. For sure, even if (and a big if) I do not fear the loss of my freedom, my HDB flat and my livelihood as a normal citizen, I will not bet my future on an abrupt change in government gahmen.

No one should call me a coward for taking such a stand. After all, I have no confidence absolutely with people who rushes in for changes without having a few plans in place. Alas, we’ll never know from JBJ what his plan of an alternate Singapore would be.


My other tirades:
Regarding Kong Hee’s Postmodernism: A Balanced Approach
Regarding Kong Hee’s Wholesome Shallowness?