Movies: The Bourne Ultimatum

Caught the third installment of the Bourne series at GV Plaza yesterday, and I must say I enjoyed it as much as I enjoyed the previous two. It has always been my opinion that this should have been what James Bond movies should have been and the latest Bond movie by Daniel Craig was probably the only one that came the closest. (Doesn’t matter no one liked him as Bond.)

There was a minor disturbance before the movie started. After the Ratatouille ‘Protect IP’ clip was shown, someone in the crowd muttered ‘Fxxk Odex’. Since I was only a few seats away from whoever that was, I replied ‘I agree’ and there was some muffled laughter from some audiences in the vicinity. Stephen Sing and Odex have very successfully made themselves the most hated in Singapore. (More on Odex in a coming post!)

Anyway, the story is about Jason Bourne’s continued attempt to uncover his identity. It begins with a leak about a certain Black Op in the CIA, which Jason is a part of. The events that transpired ultimately attracted the attention of Jason Bourne.

The CIA attempted to clean up the leak – which simply means elimination of the people involved. Jason once again got dragged into the ongoing operations, though he would want to have nothing to do with his former agency. As usual, elements in the CIA also attempted to eliminate Jason because they wouldn’t like certain things to see the light of day, as it would mean their own ruin.

In the course of the story, one would be taken to several cities in Europe: Moscow, Turin, London and Madrid, and to Tangiers in Morocco, then back to New York. There will be the usual car chases and hand to hand fighting of course. That’s not mentioning that the women in the movie are not just eye-candy or the often damsel in distress in James Bond movies!

So did Jason ultimately manage to find out who he really was and how he end up being some kind of professional assassin? And did the bad people get what they deserved? Watch the show to find out!

And I hope they make a movie on the Brotherhood of the Rose soon!

127.0.0.1     xiaxue.blogspot.com

I was reading Publiceducator’s post on his blog and out of fun I commented that if we don’t like to read someone, we can always put that person’s blog address into our host file in c:windowssystem32driversetc.

For e.g., if you don’t like this particular blog, you can just put the following entry into the host file:

127.0.0.1     xiaxue.blogspot.com

This will work as long as your browser does not use a proxy server for access. However, you can also use a .pac file as a configuration script. All you need to do is open notepad, and fill in the following text and then save the file with a .pac extension in c:. (For e.g. fxxkupblogs.pac)

function FindProxyForURL(url, host)
{if (shExpMatch (host, “xiaxue.blogspot.com”)) return “127.0.0.1:8080;”;
return “DIRECT;”
}

After which, you should have the browser use this file to determine what proxy to use. For e.g. in Firefox, you choose Automatic proxy configuration File URL and enter this: file:///c:/fxxkupblogs.pac.

And you are done. Even if by accident you clicked on a link pointing to that abominable site, you will NEVER end up there.

PS: Let me know if the code doesn’t work. I had a whole lot of other things in mine, and I cut and pasted out this part as an example so I might have carelessly removed some other parts I shouldn’t have removed.

Inconvenient Truth

While talking to a friend the other day about CO2 emissions and Global Warming, my friend suddenly threw me an unexpected question:

“How much money do you have riding on the ‘alternate energies’ industry?”

I was taken aback by the question and he further clarified, “It is my considered opinion, that Al Gore’s ‘Inconvenient Truth’ may have taken many people for a ride and he may have a lot of money riding on all these ‘Alternate Energies’ industries. I don’t think Al Gore really gives a damn about the environment considering all the bad press he gets about the energy he uses in his home. That’s not mentioning that the Bush family has strong ties with the petroleum industry and this may just be Al Gore’s way of getting back at Bush for ‘stealing’ the presidency from him in 2000.”

Quite a wild conspiracy theory, but not without merits. And on further thinking, it reminded me of a discussion on the ping.sg shoutbox with 2 other pingsters – arzhou and miccheng. Mic pointed out, that global warming may not just be due to just increase output in CO2 – or even methane – emissions, and he emphasized that he is all for reduction in the emission of greenhouse gases for the very purpose of having a less polluted atmosphere and not for the sake of ‘containing Global Warming’.

Anyway, there have been documentaries refuting that claim and I have also read articles indicating that this might also have something to do with an increase output of energy from our star – Sol (more commonly known as the Sun).

Still, a lot of people further argued that the messed up weather patterns, the stronger hurricanes and typhoons, the melting of ice caps, and the increased in rainfall and more severe flooding is a testimony of ‘global warming’.

Well, it maybe true, but more severe storms would happen as long as there is an increase in heat energy trapped in the oceans and the atmosphere. Being a layman, it is my opinion that more severe storms is a way for the planet to regulate the temperature, and to release the excess energy that is introduced.

Furthermore, more severe flooding has more to do with drainage (or the lack of it), and the elevation of the land than with rain. Take for e.g. New Orleans. Many were quick to point to the failure of the dykes as the main reason. However it was also pointed out that New Orleans is sinking (and Bangkok and Venice too!) and the dykes themselves were to be blamed for this. One of the reasons, if I got it correctly, is that the dykes removed the ability of the Mississippi River to dump fresh soil on its banks.

Now, let us look further than just the result of air pollution causing Global Warming to the cause and effect of some of the other environmental problems that we have, all as a result of our abuse and / or unsustainable use of the planet’s resources.

  1. Bad water management #1 (Overuse of underground water) -> Depleted water table and land sinkage.
  2. Bad water management #2 (Indiscriminate irrigation on acidic land) -> Displacement of salts into arable land making them barren.
  3. Bad water management #3 (Dumping of unprocessed industrial waste / sewage into rivers / lakes) -> Death of marine organisms and a possible collapse of the river / lake eco-system.
  4. Bad water management #4 (Bad Drainage) -> When a worse than normal storm hits you, you are going to be swimming.
  5. Deforestation and the loss of grassland -> Erosion of arable land.
  6. The loss of marshland / swamp -> Removes the one obstacle preventing wter erosion of land.
  7. Invasion of foreign species -> Destruction of local fauna and flora as a result of competition from species that indigenous species have no defense against.
  8. Excessive use of fertilisers -> Fungal blooms that destroys marine eco-systems and fresh water sources.
  9. Excessive use of insecticides -> Consumption of dead poisoned insects harming other creatures.
  10. Excessive amount of waste -> Non-biodegradables like plastics choking up the landscape.

And the above is an incomplete list because that’s a list of things I can remember from reading Jared Diamond’s Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed.

I do suggest you read that book for a better understanding of the herculean tasks in dealing with our environmental problems and not be too carried away by Al Gore and all those stars from Hollywood. And I am not suggesting you ignore their message anyway, but just reminding you that Global Warming isn’t the one and only environmental problem we have, and there are other problems that exist which could make Global Warming just that much worse than it already is. In fact, the case studies in Diamond’s book would point out just how some of the above cause and effects combine with one another to cause the complete collapse of certain societies.

Incidentally, Diamond’s book also mentioned something about Angkor Wat, which another pingster has posted in this post. Read and be enlightened on not just what environmental problems can do to the area we live in (and floods), but also what it means to our species as a whole!

In short, quit telling me about the ozone layer and the melting ice as if that’s the only environmental issue we have!

V-J Day

Today is V-J [Victory over Japan] or V-P [Victory in the Pacific] day.

62 years ago, At 12pm Japan Standard Time in 1945, Emperor Hirohito’s announced Japan’s acceptance of the terms of the Potsdam Declaration, and it was broadcast to the Japanese people over the radio. This is the first time the Japanese people heard the voice of their God-Emperor.

Japan was the last Axis power to surrender and with its surrender, World War II – a savage, vicious and devastating war, officially comes to an end. It signals the end of Colonialism, the defeat of Militarism and the triumph of the free world against Fascism.

A new era is ushered in Asia and within the next 20 years, countries in South East Asia all come to gain their independence from their former colonial powers, either through open rebellion or by peaceful negotiations.

Below is a list of South and South-East Asian countries which gain independence since the end of World War II

  1. Indonesia – From Holland: Aug 17, 1945
  2. Vietnam – From France: Sep 2, 1945
  3. Philippines – From US: Jul 4, 1946
  4. India – From UK: Aug 15, 1947
  5. Myanmar – From UK: Jan 4, 1948
  6. Sri Lanka – From UK: Feb 4, 1948
  7. Laos – From France: 19 Jul 1949
  8. Cambodia – From France: Nov 9, 1953
  9. Malaysia – From UK: Aug 31, 1957
  10. Singapore – Self rule from UK: Jun 3, 1959 / Independece from Malaysia Aug 9, 1965
  11. Brunei – From UK: Jan 1, 1984

The list does not include Bengladesh and Pakistan as they were split from India as a result of a war.

My Late Ramblings on Section 377A…

The Bird ‘god’ sayeth, “There are homosexuals, and there are arse bandits.”

Whatever that means? What that means is that in society, there are homosexuals who live as functional and contributing members of society, and attempt to have a loving relationship with one individual just like heterosexuals. For these people, Section 377A leaves them no room in society. Indeed I agree, as far as these group is concerned, Section 377A is an archaic and evil piece of law.

On the other hand, arse-bandits don’t give a damn about having a loving relationship with any single individual, but just for a good fxxk like any hum sup loh who seeks a good bang in a one night stand or with a prostitute. In the case of these people, Section 377A should be maintained, so society can whip their sorry asses. (And that should include those who fxxk their own girlfriends in the ass.)

This of course sounds like crap to the most liberal, because why should people who loves ass-fxxking (be it the same sex or not) be a criminal act? Above which, why should heterosexuals be spared of a whipping while they can also be promiscuous?

Simple. First, it’s called prejudice. I have been known among friends as a ‘socialist’ and to some, a die-hard homo-phobe. It is an irrational fear of something I do not do; and from a religious point of view, something which is quite ‘un-natural’ and offensive. It didn’t originally matter to me that it is quite common in the animal kingdom for incest and even such acts to happen, as my friend the ‘Magus’ had pointed it out to me.

Second (on a lesser scale), the arse-bandits are the very group that makes it hard for me (and certain elements in society) to accept homosexuality as a social norm. Either way, promiscuity is frowned upon, whether it is heterosexual or not, and it is my considered opinion that some of the more extreme elements of society or the women groups, would also love the promiscuous to get a whipping from the law.

I am not going to get all moral about this matter anyway. But there’s certainly one sick individual which, should th high hand of law to come smashing down upon with Section 377A, I wouldn’t feel a single shred of remorse.

If you want to know who you should just refer to the following links:

  1. Why Would Anyone Wish For Someone To Drown?

  2. Are Some Blogs Really Worth Our Attention?

  3. How Sick Can This Be?

  4. How Can A Blogger Be This Sick?

1 122 123 124 125 126 186