Seat Hoggers on Bus 174

Took this photo on bus 174 around 2:30pm today on my way back after lunch in Bukit Timah with xinyun. I didn’t originally noticed what they had done until I stop pounding on my Blackberry and looking at messages on Twitter.

To be fair, while there were a number of standing passengers, the bus wasn’t really packed. Above which seats were getting available every few stops. But beyond the right edge of this picture, nearer to the door, a little girl in school uniform was sitting on the place where one of the validators were mounted. So I am just wondering if they didn’t do this, that girl might get a proper seat.

I should have adjusted my position a little so I could have the girl in the shot. She and her elder sister alighted several stops before these two in the picture did the same.

That ‘bigger that cow cart wheel’ 1%…

The gover-min said it will give us 1% more in interest but will hold a total of S$20,000 in our CPF Ordinary Account, and S$40,000 in our CPF Special Account and Medisave. That’s a whopping S$60,000 dollars of good money.

The gover-min think their 1% 大过牛车轮 [translation: bigger than the cow cart’s wheel] man!! As if I am damned thrilled!

From track record, my investments are so far making more money than the CPF is paying in interest. If it was allowed, I would rather opt-out of this harebrained gover-min scheme so I can be allowed to do my own investments which will earn far, far more and earn much better.

Here’s a breakdown of my investments:

Company

Type

Duration (mths)

Sum Invested (S$)

Current Value (S$)

% Gain

HSBC

Cash – Montly

108

14,340.00

15,350.68

0.83 p.a.

AIA

Cash – Yearly

26

10,800.00

14,700.71

16.67 p.a.

AIA

Lump Sum – CPF OA

63

10,000.00

17,913.99

14.93 p.a.

AIA

Lump Sum – CPF OA

27

13,000.00

17,213.05

14.09 p.a.

AIA

Lump Sum – CPF SA

27

25,000.00

31,167.28

10.73 p.a.

AIA

Lump Sum – CPF OA

0

10,000.00

9,979.67

N.A. *

Prudential

Lump Sum – CPF OA

4

10,000.00

9,315.63

N.A. *

Sub-Total :

93,140.00

115,640.01

24.16

Note:

Red: Under-performing investment.
Black: Investment on track / earning more than 3.5% which CPF pays
* New investment.

The 10 Doctrines of Darth Grievous

  1. If your blog postings are interesting enough, there will be readers. ‘Plugging’ aka advertising, is as un-necessary as coitus interruptus with condom.
  2. If I ain’t interested, telling me about it won’t change my mind and will only push me further into hating it.
  3. If you have nothing better to say, or you don’t know anything about it, or it has entirely nothing to do with you, shut the fxxk up.
  4. If you keep turning every conversation into something about you, read Nicolas Copernicus and learn something about heliocentric cosmology.
  5. If you have a problem with a piece of technology, and RTFM – reading the freaking manual – doesn’t help, go back to the guys who made it for the solution.
  6. If you are IT challenged, quit using IT and perhaps all technology. Even Ape-man technology – starting fire with twigs – maybe too difficult for you.
  7. If you worship technology, seek help at a mental institution. Ever seen someone put a leash on himself and let the dog hold it? Technology is a pet, not a god.
  8. If you have a question, find out the answer by asking the relevant people (or using the right search parameters on Google). Shouting a question at a bunch of complete strangers to get an answer should be your last, and not first, resort.
  9. If you have already gotten an answer from the horse’s mouth – e.g. official statements from the authorities – and you don’t like it, asking everyone else again won’t change the facts.
  10. If you don’t get an answer to your dumb questions, move on. No one owes you an answer, or a living.

National Library’s 15cts fine

I run into an old friend and his wife-to-be at ChinaTown point yesterday when I met another friend to go to China Town to buy a new fish tank. (Broke the old one… that story later.) When we had dessert together – since it’s his birthday and I got no gifts for him – he told me his fiance received a mail from SLB [Singapore Library Board] informing her to pay a 15cts fine. And I suddenly recall not long ago another friend told me he received a similar letter to pay a 65cts fine.

I find it really ridiculous that they had actually done so and I was told someone who got a similar letter – this one 20cts – wrote a complaint to either the Stooge Times or TODAY about the matter and asked if it was cost effective to do so. I was told the SLB’s reply was that it only cost them 8cts a piece to mail the reminders and there was a total of S$5 million in uncollected fines.

Whoever thought it is a good idea to collect the fines now must have had brown matter in between his ears instead of the usual gray one. You know the brown one that you produce everyday? He should be fired or shot because while it might be a bad idea to write off S$5 million, it would have been easier to just write off those fines under S$5 and move on. I wonder if what they write off wouldn’t be the same as the total cost of all the 8cts reminders they have sent.

Above which, there is good reason to write off those fines. That became obvious because while discussing this ridiculous matter with my friends, we realized that it would cost at least S$1.30 (unless you are a student with fare concession) to travel to a library to pay it – i.e. if there’s a library in your town centre, and you need to take a feeder bus to go there and it cost 65cts one way using your Ezlink ItchyLink card. (It will cost you 90cts one way if you pay cash! More, if your nearest library needs multi-modal transporation.)

Even if you can just walk to one, you need to find time. Assuming you are paid S$2.5K a mth and you work 22 days every mth and 8 hours a day, you are paid S$14.20 per hour. So if it takes up an hour in total to just travel there and pay it and then return home, it will cost you $15.50 nett to pay a silly less than $1 fine. (And of course you need to put a value to your time! You are being made to do something at the expense of your free time which could be better use otherwise!)

Some civil servants serpents are just too damned stupid to realise just how much waste and losses they are creating for people. But he can of course console himself to having increase the bottom line of our zonal duo-polistic transportation companies. And if he has shares in them, console himself further on the fact that he will be getting more dividends from them due to the increase in profits.

CNG Taxis and New Taxi Operator

This is an old piece of news I am talking about and it goes back to around July 2007. This piece of news reported that Neo, managing director of Cheng Yong Credit and one of the first parallel importers here has applied for a taxi operating license.

Nothing noteworthy about that, except for the fact that Neo plans to operate an environmentally friendly fleet of 800 taxis and charge drivers the lowest daily rental in town. The reason he would be able to do so is because CNG cars are accorded a 40% discount on additional registration fees [ARF – the main car tax] until end of 2009 because they are deemed environmentally friendly. Johnny Harjantho, managing director of Smart Taxis claims that a 2 litre car running on CNG can cover 22km on $1. A 1.8 litre diesel-run car manages about 14km.

Neo said that Prime Leasing – his taxi company – will set taxi rentals at just $69 per day, versus the current industry average of $90, and fares will be ‘slightly cheaper’. On top of that, a cabby will get a lump sum reward equivalent to the residual tax value of the vehicle if he stays with Prime Leasing for 5 years continuously though the cabby will have to put down a joining deposit of about $5,000 first.

My feelings for this is mixed. First of all, I do not think more operators – or even more cabs – will improve cab services in Singapore. There are roughly 22,000 cabs in Singapore (Mar 2006 figures), and so I disagree with commuters that there is a shortage of cabs, and it is my opinion that we are finding it hard to get a cab, because of the mindset of recalcitrant taxi drivers. Cabbies who whine constantly about their difficulties (e.g. rental and fuel cost) but are yet still selective about fares. Furthermore, the taxi problem is not really a taxi one. (Note: Just a few days ago, I was rejected by a SMRT cabby [SHB5836S] to take me to Jurong from Geylang at around 11pm, after I had supper with some friends in that area.)

Next, what good is 800 cabs Prime Leasing is bringing in going to do to a market of 22000 taxis? That’s roughly 3.6% of the total taxis in operation. In other words, when there’s a full fleet of Prime Leasing cabs in operation, chances are that for every 50 cabs at the taxi stand, only 1 will be a Prime Leasing cab. How are commuters going to benefit from that even if the fares are lower? Above which, the cabbies driving them are going to come from the same pool of recalcitrant shitheads and they will still whine about the overheads – remember the $5000 deposits? – and pull the same old cinderella or ‘on call’ [now, ‘busy’] stunts so they can wait for a cab booking.

Lastly, I read that the main CNG refuelling station is in Jurong Island. In my mind, the image of a cab rushing back to Jurong Island to top up when they are literally low on gas is quite funny. Does anyone know how difficult it is to go to Jurong Island now with all those security measures in place? Just imagine the difficulty in refuelling and yet more reasons for the cabbies to whine about.

While the second CNG refuelling station in Mandai will only be completed next year and that might alleviate the situation somewhat, Mandai isn’t like your Shell or Esso stations nearby! That simply means we need even more CNG stations to make operating CNG cabs viable. And according to this article, it will cost $40 million to put in a network of 10 CNG refuelling stations in Singapore. Now I don’t even have to guess who will end up shouldering the cost knowing Singapore’s gover-min!

So, on the short term, I suspect these cabs are likely going to run on two kinds of fuel, i.e. both CNG and petrol or else it won’t be a surprise finding Prime Leasing cabs waiting for a tow truck along the road because they can’t make it back to the CNG refuelling station in Jurong Island or Mandai. And the reason the alternative will be petrol is simply because of the $6000 diesel tax. Had the alternative been diesel, then Prime Leasing’s can’t sustain the kind of rent they are offering and remain cabby friendly – unless there are big Japanese or Continent Car manufactures providing Neo with cheap cars!

In other words, there won’t be any improvements in Singapore’s cab service with this new operator. And the only other way to solve the cab problem – and in extension the whole mess with our public transport system – will simply be a redesign of the city. The model in which people are rushing from one part of the island to certain locations to work – especially the CBD – in the morning and then back from those places to go home must be put to an end.

But don’t say you don’t expect anyone with the courage to propose this and actually do it. Because the Tali-PAP fxxkers might prove you wrong. They will simply just charge the bill to all of us in the end. Simply put, Singaporeans should just stop whining and vote wisely at the ballot box. Because the more we whine the more new policies we get. And in my opinion none of them are in any way advantageous to us at all! Just take the recent CPF tweaks for example. (You can’t touch this!! * lol *)

1 67 68 69 70 71 99